Our Brains Contain Lithium—and Its Loss Might Help Drive Alzheimer’s, Study Finds

https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2025/08/MRIs-1200×675.jpg

Alzheimer’s disease is one of the cruelest conditions a person can develop. And even with recent advances, there’s only so much that can be done once its symptoms emerge. Research out this week might highlight a critical and previously missed factor driving the disease, one that could even lead to new treatments.

Scientists at Harvard Medical School led the study, published Wednesday in Nature. By studying human brain samples and mice, they found evidence that our brains naturally contain the element lithium—and that its deficiency can help explain the damage caused by Alzheimer’s. The findings are well supported and may have uncovered an important aspect of the neurological disorder, an outside expert told Gizmodo.

The study researchers “have performed detailed and well-designed studies to investigate how low lithium levels are associated with [Alzheimer’s disease] at the diagnostic, protein, cellular and gene levels,” said Timothy Chang, a neurologist at the University of California, Los Angeles who was not involved with the study. Chang is also director of the California Alzheimer’s Disease Center at UCLA.

The brains of people with Alzheimer’s are different in many ways from others. In particular, they contain high levels of misfolded amyloid beta and tau, two proteins that normally have important functions. But these aren’t the only changes seen in Alzheimer’s. And it was while investigating these other changes that the Harvard researchers made their discovery.

With the help of existing projects that collected postmortem tissue samples, they compared levels of around 30 metals in the brains of people who died along varying stages of cognitive health. The only major difference they found was with lithium. People with cognitively healthy brains had relatively high levels of lithium, whereas those with Alzheimer’s had much lower levels. Importantly, this loss of lithium was apparent even in people who only experienced mild memory problems before dying.

The researchers also studied healthy mice and genetically modified mice that develop a version of Alzheimer’s disease. When they depleted lithium from these mice, it appeared to accelerate the buildup of unhealthy amyloid beta and tau in the brain, along with memory decline. They also found evidence that this loss is caused by amyloid beta plaques binding to the brain’s lithium and that this loss of lithium seems to negatively affect all of the brain’s major cell types.

Though there has been some limited research suggesting a possible connection between lithium and Alzheimer’s, the authors say theirs is the first to show that our brains naturally carry it. What’s more, their findings hint that lithium is essential to good brain health and that its absence is key to the development of Alzheimer’s.

“This is the first study to suggest that lithium deficiency might contribute to Alzheimer’s disease. The reason this has not been proposed is because it was not believed that lithium is a natural substance in the brain with biological effect, just a drug with pharmacological effects at high doses,” senior author Bruce Yankner, professor of genetics and neurology in Harvard Medical School’s Blavatnik Institute, told Gizmodo. “As such, this study is the first to explore the consequences of lithium deficiency in the brain.”

The implications of this study, while still early, could certainly be dramatic. Yankner and his team were also able to identify a lithium-based compound that wasn’t so easily bound by amyloid beta. And when they gave mice (older healthy mice and mice with Alzheimer’s) this compound, it appeared to prevent the damaging brain changes and memory loss normally inevitable with the neurodegenerative condition. Even the best amyloid-based treatments for Alzheimer’s available today, by contrast, only modestly delay its progression.

Other forms of lithium are used in medicine to treat certain mental health disorders, particularly depression. But these versions require high dosages to work as intended and come with many side effects as a result. The team’s compound, however, required a much lower dose to be effective in the mice, and no sign of toxicity was observed at all.

“Further clinical studies in humans would be necessary to evaluate if the right type and dose of lithium can prevent or slow Alzheimer’s disease,” Chang noted.

Yankner and his team are now moving ahead with the research needed to show their compound (or something similar) can be safely tested in human clinical trials. But even before then, the team’s discovery could pay off in other ways. It might be possible to screen for Alzheimer’s risk in the future by measuring people’s lithium levels, for example. And there are still many mysteries left to untangle about lithium and its role in brain health.

“As a neuroscientist, I am excited about exploring the physiology of lithium in the brain,” Yankner said. “I suspect we have just scratched the surface of what will be some very interesting biology.”

Gizmodo

Low Dose of Lithium Reverses Alzheimer’s Symptoms In Mice

An anonymous reader quotes a report from New Scientist: People withAlzheimer’s disease have lower levels of lithium in their brains, and giving lithium to mice with symptoms of the condition reverses cognitive decline. Together, the findings suggest that lithium deficiency could be a driver of Alzheimer’s disease and that low-dose lithium medications could help treat it. […] [Bruce Yanknerat Harvard University] and his colleagues analyzed levels of 27 metals in the brains of 285 people after they died, 94 of whom were diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease and 58 of whom had mild cognitive impairment, a precursor of the condition. The other participants showed no signs of cognitive decline at the time of their death.
Lithium levels in the prefrontal cortex — a brain region crucial for memory and decision-making — were about 36 percent lower, on average, in people with Alzheimer’s disease than in those without any cognitive decline. For those with mild cognitive impairment, lithium levels were about 23 percent lower. "We suspect that’s due to a number of environmental factors: dietary intake, genetics and so forth," says Yankner. Yet there seemed to be another reason, too. In those with Alzheimer’s disease, clumps of proteins called amyloid plaques contained nearly three times the amount of lithium as plaque-free regions of their brain. "Lithium becomes sequestered in these plaques," says Yankner. "We have two things going on. There is impaired uptake of lithium [in the brain] very early on and then, as the disease progresses, the lithium that is in the brain is further diminished by being bound to amyloid."
To understand how this influences cognition, the team genetically engineered 22 mice to develop Alzheimer’s-like symptoms and reduced their lithium intake by 92 percent. After about eight months, the animals performed significantly worse on multiple memory tests compared with 16 mice on a standard diet. It took lithium-deficient mice around 10 seconds longer to find a hidden platform in a water maze, for example, even after six days of training. Their brains also contained nearly two and a half times as many amyloid plaques. Genetic analysis of brain cells from the lithium-deficient mice showed increased activity in genes related to neurodegeneration and Alzheimer’s. They also had more brain inflammation and their immune cells were less able to clear away amyloid plaques, changes also seen in people with Alzheimer’s disease.
The team then screened different lithium compounds for their ability to bind to amyloid and found that lithium orotate — a naturally occurring compound in the body formed by combining lithium with orotic acid — appeared to be the least likely to get trapped within plaques. Nine months of treatment with this compound significantly reduced plaques in mice with Alzheimer’s-like symptoms, and they also performed as well on memory tests as normal mice. These results suggest lithium orotate could be a promising treatment for Alzheimer’s. The findings have been published in the journal Nature.


Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Slashdot

Ask Slashdot: Who’s Still Using an RSS Reader?

alternative_right writes: I use RSS to cover all of my news-reading needs because I like a variety of sources spanning several fields — politics, philosophy, science, and heavy metal. However, it seems Google wanted to kill off RSS a few years back, and it has since fallen out of favor. Some of us are holding on, but how many? And what software do you use (or did you write your own XML parsers)?


Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Slashdot

This Open-Source File Backup App Is So Good I Can’t Believe It’s Free

https://static1.makeuseofimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/wm/2025/08/freefilesync-app-open-on-a-benq-monitor-1.jpg

The importance of backing up your files seems obvious, but choosing how gets complicated fast. The built-in Windows backup option is painfully basic, while decent software costs serious money. FreeFileSync claims to solve both problems and does so brilliantly.

Meet FreeFileSync

FreeFileSync is an open-source file synchronization tool that creates exact copies of your folders wherever you need them. Unlike dedicated backup apps such as Duplicati, which store files in compressed archives that require the app to restore, FreeFileSync keeps your files accessible in their original format.

FreeFileSync offers four sync modes:

  • Mirror: Creates an exact copy of your source folder
  • Two-way: Syncs changes in both directions
  • Update: Copies only new or modified files
  • Custom: Lets you define exactly how each type of file operation is handled, for greater flexibility

FreeFileSync also handles advanced backup setups with ease. It supports syncing to multiple destinations at once, making it perfect for following the 3-2-1 backup rule—three copies of your data, on two different types of media, with one stored offsite. You can chain multiple sync pairs in a single session, allowing you to back up to a local drive and a network location in one go.

Tools like Duplicati and Macrium Reflect are excellent for full-system backups of your Windows 11 PC. But if you need a fast, no-fuss way to copy key files and folders, FreeFileSync is a much simpler solution.

While the core software is completely free, FreeFileSync also offers a Donation Edition that unlocks extra features, such as faster performance through parallel file operations. For most people, the free version is more than enough, since it includes all essential functions. The donation-only features mainly benefit those who regularly sync giant datasets or work over slow network connections.

How to Use FreeFileSync to Automate File Backups

FreeFileSync isn’t the most intuitive backup tool and requires some technical know-how to get it working. While it’s powerful and flexible, you may find the interface overwhelming and the setup process confusing without referring to the documentation or community forums.

That said, once you get the hang of it, creating a basic backup is straightforward. Let’s walk through a simple example: mirroring up a folder from your primary storage drive to a secondary drive.

In FreeFileSync, click the + icon to select your source folder on the left—this is what you want to back up. Choose your destination on the right—whether that’s an external drive, network location, or cloud sync folder.

Before syncing, check the comparison settings by clicking the gear icon next to Compare (F6). I use the default File time and size option, which is fine in almost all cases. Only switch to File content if you need absolute accuracy and can afford the extra time, as it’s much slower on large folders. Skip File size unless you know what you’re doing.

If you’re backing up photos or videos, turn on Ignore time shift [hours] in the comparison settings. This helps FreeFileSync avoid re-copying files because of small time differences (like when daylight saving time changes or when you’re copying between Windows and a NAS).

Next, configure your sync settings. Click the green Gear icon by the Synchronize tab and select Mirror mode. This creates an exact copy of your source folder and removes files from the backup that no longer exist in the original.

While Mirror mode is useful for keeping your backup clean and preventing old files from piling up, its behavior also means it will copy corrupted files, those locked by ransomware, and similar. And if you delete a file, its "backup" will be deleted as well. To combat this, you’ll need to set up file versioning, as explained below.

Another option is to choose Update mode, which only adds files to your backup folder and will never delete them.

Two-way sync mode has its uses, too, but is more niche. For example, it could be useful to place copies of files into cloud storage, where someone else also works on them.

Setting up Filters (F7) can save both space and time during backups. Click the funnel icon to open the filter settings. Here, you can exclude folders or files that don’t need to be backed up—like temporary files or folders that can be recreated later.

Before running any sync, always click Compare first to preview exactly what changes FreeFileSync will make before anything is copied or deleted.

Enable Versioning to Keep Backup Copies of Changed Files

To protect important files from accidental changes or deletions, enable versioning in FreeFileSync. This feature keeps older versions of files so you can recover them if something goes wrong during sync.

Click the Gear icon next to Synchronization (F8) in the main window to open the sync settings. Select the Versioning option under Delete and overwrite. Then, click Browse and choose a location for the versioning folder, such as E:\Backups\Versions.

Finally, pick a naming style; timestamps are a reliable overall choice. This way, FreeFileSync keeps backup copies of previous versions just in case you accidentally overwrite something important.

Automating and Scheduling Backups

FreeFileSync doesn’t include built-in scheduling, so to automate backups, you’ll need to create a batch file and schedule it using Windows Task Scheduler. While it’s not the most user-friendly process, at least you can set it up once and forget.

After setting up your sync pairs and verifying everything with Compare, click File > Save as Batch Job. This saves your sync configuration as a .ffs_batch file. In the batch job window, you can customize several options—such as whether the sync runs silently in the background, whether errors are shown, and whether a log file is created.

Make sure to check the boxes for Run minimized and Auto-close if you want the task to run without your input. Once saved, this batch file becomes a self-contained script that you can run manually or schedule via Task Scheduler to run automatically.

Save each backup job as a batch file—one for documents (runs daily), another for video projects (runs after each editing session), and a weekly full backup of everything else.

Alternatively, you can use RealTimeSync, part of FreeFileSync, to monitor folders and trigger backups when files change. Unlike Task Scheduler, RealTimeSync detects and copies files in real-time depending on the set interval, so it’s ideal if you want to back up changes as soon as they happen.

While the lack of native scheduling is a limitation, both Task Scheduler and RealTimeSync offer reliable workarounds once set up correctly. Just remember to test your scheduled tasks—there’s nothing worse than discovering your automated backups haven’t run for months.

FreeFileSync also offers a portable version that runs directly from a USB drive, allowing you to set up backups on multiple computers. It’s a convenient, plug-and-play option for quick, hassle-free use.

The Not-So-Good Bits of FreeFileSync

FreeFileSync’s interface feels like it’s stuck in 2010. While it gets the job done, the cluttered layout and technical jargon can overwhelm newcomers. Even simple tasks like setting up filters or understanding sync directions often require digging through documentation or watching tutorials.

Cloud support is another area where FreeFileSync falls short. It natively works with Google Drive and supports FTP and SFTP connections for server-based storage. But if you’re using Dropbox, OneDrive, or other cloud services, the situation is trickier.

You’ll need workarounds, like installing the desktop apps to sync with local folders or using third-party tools such as Mountain Duck to mount cloud storage as drives in File Explorer. For a tool that’s actively maintained in 2025, this setup feels way outdated.

Download: FreeFileSync (Free, premium version availbale)


Despite these quirks, FreeFileSync gets the basics right. It’s reliable, completely free without ads, and gives you total control over your backup strategy. While it focuses on file and folder backup rather than full system imaging, it’s perfect for keeping your documents, photos, and personal data safe.

MakeUseOf

Record and Replay Requests With Laravel ChronoTrace

https://picperf.io/https://laravelnews.s3.amazonaws.com/featured-images/laravel-chronotrace-featured.png

Record and Replay Requests With Laravel ChronoTrace

The Laravel ChronoTrace package enables you to record and replay Laravel requests deterministically and generate tests from production traces.


The post Record and Replay Requests With Laravel ChronoTrace appeared first on Laravel News.

Join the Laravel Newsletter to get all the latest
Laravel articles like this directly in your inbox.

Laravel News