Netflix drops the full trailer for ‘Bright,’ its $90M+ potential blockbuster hit

Netflix may have its first blockbuster movie on its hands. The new, full-length trailer for the upcoming Will Smith movie, “Bright,” from “Suicide Squad” director David Ayer dropped during San Diego’s Comic-Con yesterday. The trailer gives viewers a longer look into the upcoming film, which takes place in a futuristic world where magical creatures like orcs and elves exist alongside humans, and face discrimination because of their differences.

The movie’s plot sees Smith playing LAPD cop Scott Ward, who’s paired with an orc partner, Nick Jakoby (Joel Edgerton) – one of the first orcs to be appointed to the police department. Despite their issues, the two bond while on a mission to track down a powerful weapon: a magic wand that everyone’s after.

VIDEO

Plot aside, Netflix’s “Bright” is one of its most ambitious deals to date, and not only because of its price tag or its magical creature-filled storyline.

The company had reportedly outbid Warner Bros teamed up with MGM, who were willing to go as high as $50 million, and PalmStar’s Kevin Frakes, who committed to a budget of $60 million, for the movie.

Netflix swooped in with a promise to invest north of $90 million and stole the whole deal.

Netflix has done high-dollar deals before, in order to score big name talent and unique scripts. For example, the company paid $60 million for the Brad Pitt war comedy, “War Machine.” But that movie was the sort of thing that may not have even been made if not for Netflix. Even star Pitt noted during a press conference, if it did get made at all, “it would have been at one-sixth of the budget.”

Other Netflix films have received critical praise, like its debut movie, 2015’s “Beasts of No Nation.” Netflix bought the film $12 million, which told the story of child soldiers in a West African country. More recently, Netflix’s fantasy movie “Okja,” backed by a $50 million investment, was even cautiously dubbed Netflix’s first potential hit. It may be weird and great, but it’s not yet a mainstream success.

The sorts of movies that appeal at Cannes, aren’t always those that deliver the largest audiences, of course. Take, for example, “Suicide Squad.” The movie was panned by critics, but still pulled in $746 million at the box office worldwide, making it a commercial success. And now its director David Ayer is back, with “Bright.”

Netflix has tried to appeal to the masses before – by scooping up a series of Adam Sandler movies in a 2014 deal, which it expanded this March to include four more films.These clearly have a sizable enough built-in viewership to be worth further investment for Netflix, but they’re not what you’d call blockbusters, by any means.

“Bright,” however, could be a legitimate hit for Netflix – the kind of movie that would have been shown in theaters – at scale, not limited releases –  in years past. It may even be the start of a franchise for Netflix, Deadline had reported. (Assuming it delivers, of course.)

And if “Bright” becomes a true blockbuster for Netflix, it presents a very real challenge the movie industry as a whole, from deal-making to distribution.

As Netflix basically said in its earnings a few days ago, the company aims to save movies by disrupting the movie business as whole, like the way it disrupted TV.

“We understand that our approach to films – debuting movies on Netflix first – is counter to Hollywood’s century-old windowing tradition. But just as we changed and reinvented the TV business by putting consumers first and making access to content more convenient, we believe internet TV can similarly reinvigorate the film business (as distinct from the theatrical business),” the company stated.

Netflix has plans to release 40 feature films this year, from those with big stars to indies from unknown new voices. That’s up from the 16 films it put out in 2016, and part of its larger $6 billion budget for original content.

“Bright” will stream on Netflix on December 22.

via TechCrunch
Netflix drops the full trailer for ‘Bright,’ its $90M+ potential blockbuster hit

The USMC M16 / M4 Technical Manual – Oorah Manuals!

A Marine and his rifle makes perhaps one of the most individually lethal combinations on the planet. Marines and their rifles, even deadlier, and battalions, supported by individual and combined arms one of the most feared and revered fighting organizations on the planet. However, all that efficiency is not just from Espirit de Corps. Much […]

Read More …

The post The USMC M16 / M4 Technical Manual – Oorah Manuals! appeared first on The Firearm Blog.


via The Firearm Blog
The USMC M16 / M4 Technical Manual – Oorah Manuals!

RepairClinic.com

If you have an appliance (especially an older one) that has a minor problem and you want to DIY the fix instead of buying a replacement or buying a repair, consult RepairClinic.com. Type in the model number and you get taken to a page that lists the most common problems. The page for that problem lists – most likely/common to least – the various things that could cause a problem. For example, for our 20 year old washer, the page told us “for a small leak at the front of the machine”, it’s most commonly this part. The part arrived in a couple days and the linked video had crystal clear instructions on how to take apart the machine, swap the part and close everything back up. Best of all, in case I forgot, the emailed invoice even had a link to the video.

— Burton Strauss

RepairClinic.com


via Cool Tools
RepairClinic.com

Qualcomm has some trouble on its hands

Qualcomm’s finances are taking heavy hits over its licensing dispute with Apple and analysts are expressing concern.

Today, the company reported its Q3 earnings and front-and-center were the company’s various legal disputes which are causing its profits and revenues to dive. The earnings report showcased a whopping 40 percent decline in year-over-year profits with Q3 net income falling from $1.44 billion in 2016 to $866 million. Revenues also fell, dropping 11.1 percent to $5.4 billion. Wall Street had expected much of the bad news but shares still slid 2 percent after-hours.

Responsible for a good deal of the drop was the company’s ongoing dispute with Apple which surrounds the iPhone-maker’s refusal to pay royalties to Qualcomm on certain technologies which Apple CEO Tim Cook believes “[Qualcomm] had nothing to do with,” and is collecting money on “for no reason.”

In January, Apple sued Qualcomm for $1 billion. The WSJ reported this morning that a number of Taiwan-based contract manufacturers including Foxconn had filed a lawsuit against Qualcomm in U.S. federal district court. Earlier this month, Qualcomm sued Apple for patent infringement and is seeking an injunction on iPhones that allegedly infringe on its technologies. To make things worse, another unnamed licensee has also ceased royalty payments to the company.

Much of the question-and-answer period of today’s earnings call involved analysts trying to find out how long the legal disputes with Apple and others would stretch on or attempting to get answers regarding who the mystery “licensee” was that had stopped making royalty payments.

One particularly testy moment came when an analyst got into a back-and-forth with Qualcomm President Derek Aberle on whether current royalty disputes would lead to more customers stopping payment to Qualcomm.

“Given the escalation here, given everything else that’s been going on, how do we gain conviction that we don’t see further contagion or further spreading to other customers given that this seems to be bleeding out?” Stacy Rasgon, a senior analyst at Bernstein Research asked.

“On the question of contagion, we’re working really hard to stabilize the regulatory environment and that remains a priority for us,” said Aberle. “Apple is focused on their agreement.. and we’re going to focus on getting those things resolved and I don’t think, as we sit here, that we have any indication that this is going to result in a bunch of other licensees deciding not to report payroll.”

“But you never have any indication, do you?” the analyst interjected.

“You never know what you never know, but I’d say historically, you know, if you look at it historically, we haven’t had that problem,” said Aberle. “As we’ve had disputes we’ve been able to resolve them without other licensees just deciding that they’re not going to comply with their agreements. I think that’s the best that we can tell you at this point.”

“But that’s exactly what’s happening right now isn’t it?”

Featured Image: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

via TechCrunch
Qualcomm has some trouble on its hands

Artificial Sweeteners Associated With Weight Gain, Heart Problems In Analysis of Data From 37 Studies

An anonymous reader quotes a report from NPR: The theory behind artificial sweeteners is simple: If you use them instead of sugar, you get the joy of sweet-tasting beverages and foods without the downer of extra calories, potential weight gain and related health issues. In practice, it’s not so simple, as a review of the scientific evidence on non-nutritive sweeteners published Monday shows. After looking at two types of scientific research, the authors conclude that there is no solid evidence that sweeteners like aspartame and sucralose help people manage their weight. And observational data suggest that the people who regularly consume these sweeteners are also more likely to develop future health problems, though those studies can’t say those problems are caused by the sweeteners. The review, published Monday in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, looked at 37 studies. Seven of them were randomized trials, covering about 1,000 people, and the rest were observational studies that tracked the health and habits of almost 406,000 people over time.



Share on Google+

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

via Slashdot
Artificial Sweeteners Associated With Weight Gain, Heart Problems In Analysis of Data From 37 Studies

A List of CAD Software Programs, Both Paid and Free

[Thumbnail image credit: By Freeformer – Created and originally uploaded to the English Wikipedia by Freeformer, CC BY-SA 3.0]

Designing 3D parts is tough, but with good software it become easier. Everyone has their favorite tool, and below we outline some of the most popular CAD programs. And if you’re prototyping on a budget, or have a quick fix to make, there’s lots of great free tools out there for creating and editing 3D models too.

Paid CAD Software Programs

3D Studio Max (3DS Max) was developed by Autodesk, is one of the gold standard programs for 3D modeling, animation, and graphical rendering. It is used frequently in the movie industry and in the creation of video games, and is especially useful for creating lifelike representations of living things and environments. Its tools are arguably more robust than necessary for modeling engineering parts; that is, its tool-set may be better suited for figure modeling and artistic projects – while a program like Rhino, Pro-E, or Inventor is better suited for machine components – especially when scale matters.

3DS Max comes equipped with a wide range of tools capable of adding impressive textures and skins to 3D models. When it comes to 3D printing, these tools are much less useful than in the world of rendering and computer graphics / simulation. An exported 3D printing file will rarely, if ever, maintain visually-relevant surface data.

The considerable cost for a 3DS Max license can be seen as a relatively high barrier for entry. A single license costs 3,675 USD in 2014. A short-run free trial is also available. It should also be noted, however, that a free 3-year license is available for students.

Adobe Suite harnesses the power of Photoshop in the Creative Cloud to enable editing and creating 3D models. This relatively new set of features may seem lacking to advanced modelers who are more familiar with other premium software, however it is comparatively easy to use and easy to learn for those who are already experienced with Photoshop and the Adobe Suite. Adobe’s effort to enable quick export of 3D printable files should not be overlooked. Expect them to add additional functionality and features in the future.

Autodesk Inventor was created with mechanical design in mind, is an incredibly robust piece of software capable of 3D mechanical design, documentation, and product simulation. Digital prototyping of the highest quality can be achieved with Autodesk Inventor. It is especially suited for mechanical engineering applications.

The program has two flavors: Autodesk Inventor and Autodesk Inventor Professional. The vanilla version allows users to created detailed drawings, assemblies, and CAD models. The professional version adds simulation, routed systems, and tooling capabilities. A full professional license costs $7,295 USD. A free 3-year license is available for students.

CATIA was created by the same company as SolidWorks, purports to be "the World’s Leading Solution for Product Design and Innovation". Beyond mere 3D modeling, CATIA offers tools for clear design, mechanical engineering, electrical and fluid systems design, as well as systems engineering. After producing models, CATIA enables developers to piece together parts and view models interacting in realistic simulations with impressive quality. These almost-real digital constructions are of such high quality that they are often used in advertising or for display purposes on their own.

Beyond its surface-level offerings, CATIA is capable of advanced surface modeling, industrial design concept engineering, reverse engineering and surface reuse, systems simulation, embedded systems modeling, systems safety analysis, tooling design, electronics engineering, electrical design, structural part and assembly design, style-to-surface comparative modeling, mechanical systems design, and more. As with other software of its kind, CATIA is used in almost every major industry where it can be used – including aerospace, automotive, shipping, energy, medical, and high-tech electronics.

CATIA has the highest barrier to entry for any 3D modeling program in the world. Like elite enterprises themselves, CATIA is a broad, deep ocean of capabilities and knowledge. An unprepared user could easily drown. Nonetheless, CATIA is behind some of the most advanced engineering projects on the planet and for some enterprises, the high cost is justified.

Although CATIA representatives will discourage people from posting the real price of the software suite, information posted by designers seeking quotes has tagged the price for a recent release (as of 2012-2013) at anywhere between 9,000 and 65,000 USD per unit, depending upon the number of modules included. An annual maintenance fee of 18% is also levied on the buyer, which can easily bring the lifetime cost of the product over 100,000 USD.

PTC Creo (formerly known as Pro/Engineer or Pro-E) features productivity tools that can be used in a number of industries. It is a scalable, interoperable suite of design software that enables concept development, prototype modeling, advanced 3D rendering, and dozens of additional functionalities. For 3D CAD modeling, PTC Creo Parametric is the go-to part of the suite. Like SolidWorks and Autodesk Inventor, its interface will be familiar to those familiar with engineering-focused 3D modeling programs. Producing 2D sketches and 3D extrusions helps build objects in a virtual environment. The novel part of PTC Creo comes from the sheer number of extendable, interactive add-ons that can work together with the core programs and share files easily. Bright, colorful models come to life quickly on the screen – giving a more intuitive sense of models and more intuitive editing tools than some comparatively priced software.

PTC Creo provides in-depth control of complex geometries and parametric objects. Crucially, it enables the generation of complete digital representations of products or parts being designed – something that few similar programs profess to offer. Its capabilities can generally be split into three sections: engineering design, analysis, and manufacturing. Data can be represented as renderings or as 2D drawings.

Free 30 day trials and a free academic edition are available. The full version and its elements have a pricing structure that is difficult to find without requesting a quote; however, Creo Parametric is reported to cost 3,500 USD.

Rhinoceros (Rhino) and its associated products (named after other animals) are relatively enduring tools in the 3D modeling space. Development of the initial version occurred more than two decades ago. Rhino is currently in its fifth version.

More focused than 3DS Max, Rhino offers a broad range of tools for modeling, editing, drafting, 3D capture, analysis, and rendering. The suite is used mainly for modeling mechanical designs and managing engineering projects, although it can be used for virtually any 3D task. The interface is relatively simple, setting the barrier for entry comparatively low. While not as robust as Autodesk Inventor, a full license for Rhino 5 costs only 995 USD. Multi-month free trials are also available.

Maya is another advanced offering from Autodesk, including tools for 3D animation, modeling, simulation, rendering, and compositing. The program is immensely capable, able to easily integrate 3D motion, 3D modeling, and cinematic-quality interactions. It is arguably more capable than necessary for 3D modeling of components to print with 3D printers, but the functionality is all present at its core.

A single license costs 3,675 USD, while a free 3-year license is available for students. Short-run free trials are also available.

SolidWorks is built from the ground up for mechanical design. It has a broad and robust feature set perfect for 3D CAD, product data management and consolidation, simulation, technical communication, and electrical design. Solidworks is used in virtually every industry that could have need for custom-designed parts, including but not limited to: aerospace, automotive, construction, energy, manufacturing, medical, industrial equipment, and high-tech electronics.

Along with dedicated archives, live support, forums, blogs, user groups, individualized programs, extensive documentation, and a host of other resources, SolidWorks is equipped to deal with enterprise-level institutions and individuals alike.

The software itself is complex, but very responsive. Interfaces in Autodesk Inventor and extremely similar and users familiar with one will find picking up the other takes only moments.

A single-user license for SolidWorks costs 3,995 USD, while a professional license costs 5490 USD. Free trials are not guaranteed and must be requested. They are not available for students at any time.

Free CAD Software Programs

123D is a suite of software developed by AutoDesk. Including tools for sculpting, modeling, drawing, creating circuit projects, 3D file manipulation, and much more, the suite is geared for beginning users and enables them to produce compelling models with relatively simple tools. TinkerCAD, although hosted separately, was added to the suite in 2013.

Programs within the suite can be downloaded to computers and mobile devices, or launched live on the web on supported browsers. Simple design and responsive tools enable users of any skill level to produce quality 3D models which can then be exported for 3D printing. As with most freeware, 123D suite programs lack robust tools and detailed attention given to units – making them inadequate for complex mechanical assemblies or printed parts whose accuracy is crucial to their operation.

Blender is a free and open source 3D animation and modeling program. It supports a broad array of 3D processes, including: modeling, rigging, animation, simulation, rendering, compositing, and motion tracking. It even enables video editing and video game creation. Open scripts enable further customization. Since the entire project is community-driven and free, frequent updates and changes to the original source code are released – giving Blender more responsiveness than some larger, more tightly-controlled programs.

Even with its fully-featured 3D environment, Blender lacks some of the more robust and powerful tools present in paid/premium software – such as those specifically designed for prototyping and mechanical engineering reducing the number or severity of sharp intersections between surfaces.

FreeCAD is a parametric 3D modeler. Parametric modeling allows you to easily modify your design by going back into your model history and changing its parameters. FreeCAD is open source (LGPL license) and completely modular, allowing for very advanced extension and customization. It also lends itself very well for scripting since nearly every feature can be accessed through its Python API.

OpenSCAD is free software for creating solid 3D models. Unlike Blender or TinkerCAD, OpenSCAD focuses specifically on the mechanical dimensions and properties of CAD models instead of their artistic properties. It is ideal for creating machine parts and detailed mechanical models. It is not, however, useful for creating animated movies or graphical renderings.

OpenSCAD enables a user to build models from 2D outlines or by compositing solid geometry, as in many premium programs. It enables export in common file formats and supports STLs for 3D printing.

SketchUp is a free 3D design program curated by Trimble. It includes a library full of free 3D models which anyone can use and to which anyone can contribute. Its Layout feature enables 3D models to be converted into realistic drawings easily – these can then be exported in a variety of file types, in addition to the ordinary export options afforded to its 3D modeling suite.

A Sketchup Pro License costs many hundreds of USD and adds additional features and functionalities. Its low barrier to entry and the ease with which a user can create or import models makes SketchUp an appealing tool for beginning 3D modelers. As with other free software, it lacks the robust features and complex assembly features that premium programs often contain. Advanced users may find its simple interfaces lacking, but this is precisely why it appeals to beginner users.

TinkerCAD Unlike standalone 3D modeling software, exists only online and functions on a variety of browsers (although Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox are recommended). TinkerCAD has a low barrier to entry and is free to use. Beginning users are guided through the 3D design process with lessons, teaching basics before allowing users to move on to more advanced techniques. Founded in 2011, the software package was acquired by AutoDesk in 2013 and was rolled into the 123D family of products.

___________________

This post is provided by Fictiv, the most efficient manufacturing platform for fabricating parts. Powered by a distributed network of highly vetted vendors, the online interface makes it easy for customers to get instant quotes, review manufacturing feedback, and manage orders—all through a single service.


via Core77
A List of CAD Software Programs, Both Paid and Free

Why You Should Not Get a Patent

People design because they are creative, not because they are experts in patent law. Still, to prevent your ideas from being ripped off it’s necessary to know something about patents, copyright, and trademarks. 

In the video below, John Sanders of Sanders Machine Works discusses intellectual property (IP) law with Ty Kendrick, an Ohio attorney who specializes in patents and trademarks. Sanders’ interest in IP springs from his experience as a designer whose products have been copied by others.

The conversation begins with Sanders expressing his belief that as a small business person, he lacks the resources to sue all of the people who might copy his products—and given that constraint, it’s more important to "crush it" when executing his product and business plan than it is to patent his ideas.

Kendrick says there’s some logic to what Sanders is saying but points out that it’s not a black and white issue; there are things you can do to protect your IP that fall short of a patent. They go on to discuss design and utility patents, how trademarks (and their subcategory—trade dress) can be used to fend off counterfeiters, and the importance of timing in protecting your ideas. 

It’s a wide ranging conversation and there’s likely to be something in it you haven’t heard before.


via Core77
Why You Should Not Get a Patent