Startups, you must raise this much to join the 1%

Today, we are finding out how much money a startup needs to raise to be counted among the best-capitalized new companies in its home state.

Why bother with this? Because for states not on the coasts, the exercise gives local entrepreneurs and outside observers a benchmark for evaluating where a company sits on a state’s spectrum of startup companies.

Crunching the national numbers

We’ll start at the national level before we dive into individual states and their nuances.

To answer our question, we aggregated pre-IPO venture capital and venture debt deal data from around 24,600 companies that meet the following criteria:

  • The company was founded in or after 2003 — what most consider the age of the unicorn.
  • The company is based in the United States and we know where it’s located.
  • The company has raised rounds of known size.
  • The company is not in the petrochemical, life sciences, clean energy or heavy manufacturing sectors, which have significantly different funding dynamics and capital requirements than typical “tech” startups.

We’re going to find out what it takes for a company to be at or above certain positions on the startup funding curve. So how much money does a startup need to raise to be in the upper half of U.S. startups in terms of the amount of money raised? To show this, we made a chart plotting the total amount of money raised that corresponds to different percentiles, from zero through one hundred.

And here’s a table that shows the corresponding amounts of total startup funding for key points of interest on the graph above.

For all the companies we analyzed, the amount of total private funding each has received really runs the gamut. The midpoint of the curve, the median value, might be surprising. For your startup to be on the upper half of the funding curve, nationwide, you must raise at least $1.75 million from investors. Although that number may appear small to many, it shows just how few companies are able to raise any significant amount of capital.

From there, numbers go “up and to the right” fairly quickly. To join the vaunted “one percent” of startups, as ranked by the total amount of money raised, a company needs to have received roughly $163 million in pre-IPO equity and debt financing. And unless you’re Uber, well, there’s no way you’re in the 100th percentile.

State by state

The curve above may illustrate the national rankings, but what about on a state-by-state level?

It’s probably unfair to stack companies based in states with comparatively smaller tech startup ecosystems against, say, New York or California. Well, founders from Wyoming, North Dakota, Alaska and Iowa, you’re in luck. We crunched the numbers for all 50 states in the union, plus the District of Columbia.

In the map below (interactive version here), you’ll be able to see the cut-off point for joining the top 50 percent of companies in your state, ranked by total funds raised to date.

It won’t be a shock that certain states have higher median (which is a fancy way of saying the 50th percentile) funding amounts than others. States like California, Texas, New York, Massachusetts and others with relatively high levels of startup activity are more likely to have higher median funding values than those with less startup activity.

That should strike most as fairly obvious, but what’s interesting about this map is that, ultimately, there’s a relatively narrow range of funding levels that land companies in the top half of startups in their states.

Notwithstanding outliers like Hawaii, where the median funding amount is $75,000 in our data set, raising between $500,000 and $2 million is enough to join the top half of companies in many states. During a time where multi-million-dollar seed rounds happen with surprising regularity on the coasts, one might be surprised to learn that raising just $1 million is enough to rank in the top half of companies in 28 states.

In other words, there’s a fairly low barrier to entering the top half of startups — especially outside of the coasts.

The rich kids’ table

But what about the top 1 percent of startups in each state? Here we have another map (interactive version here):

We see higher numbers (and darker colors) in states with relatively high levels of startup activity. But one of the other data points this map highlights is the geographic distribution of well-capitalized companies. California and New York are both home to a lot of companies with lots of funding behind them, which results in fairly high total fundraising figures for the 99th percentile of companies.

However, there are still companies with high values at the 99th percentile threshold despite having comparatively less startup activity. That’s because these states are home to at least one company that’s received a large amount of private investment.

For example, Utah and Arizona’s 99th percentile figures are comparable to California’s. Although Utah has its own startup scene in the Salt Lake City and Provo metropolitan regions, it’s because three unicorns — Domo (with $689 million in equity financing), InsideSales.com (with $251 million in financing) and Pluralsight ($192.5 million in financing) — are headquartered in the state.

Arizona is the home of Carvana, which received $300 million in equity financing before going public in April, as well as other well-funded companies like OfferPad and Katerra. Katerra joined the billion-dollar valuation club last month with a $130 million Series C round that valued the company at $1 billion. It’s interesting to see just how much influence one or two well-capitalized startups can do to the numbers at the extreme end of the funding spectrum.

Standing out from the crowd

Joining the exclusive club of one-percenters is hard, and, by definition, nearly every company fails to gain entry. But that’s alright.

For founders and investors alike, the heartening thing to take away is that, in most cases, even a small seed and Series A round puts your company in the top half of startups founded in or after 2003. And if there’s one good thing about being middle of the pack, it’s that you have plenty of company.

via TechCrunch
Startups, you must raise this much to join the 1%

Keep Prying Eyes Out of Your Web History With 50% Off TorGuard VPN and Proxy Subscriptions

VPNs are in the news these days, and with good reason, so if you want to try one out without breaking the bank, you can save 50% on TorGuard’s already-affordable prices today with promo code TGLifetime50.

TorGuard is a longtime Lifehacker reader favorite, and offers both a full VPN service, plus a cheaper proxy package if you just want to get around location-based restrictions on the web. With the promo code You’ll only pay $30 per year for the VPN, or $23 for the proxy (with monthly plans also available), so there’s little reason not to start protecting your privacy.

Have any experience with TorGuard, or VPNs in general? Sound off in the comments.



via Lifehacker
Keep Prying Eyes Out of Your Web History With 50% Off TorGuard VPN and Proxy Subscriptions

Startup Accelerator Announced as Part of Smart Columbus

A Silicon Valley think tank will bring a ten-week startup accelerator program to Downtown Columbus in the fall, the latest in what has been a steady stream of announcements in recent months from the Smart Columbus team.

Singularity University announced the program today, to be called the Smart City Accelerator. It will be open to both local and national businesses, ranging from two-person startups to established corporations (who would be able to send a small team).

Only ten businesses will be selected to take part in the program, which will run from September 12th to November 17th. The selected applicants will be eligible to receive up to $100,000 in funding from Columbus-based venture capital firm NCT Ventures.

“The SU Smart City Accelerator will attract innovators from around the world and amplify the successes Columbus already has achieved in becoming recognized as a global center of technology and innovation,” said Mayor Andrew Ginther in a press release.

“We are committed to giving the innovators and entrepreneurs who participate in this world-class accelerator program full access to our community as a living laboratory so that we can learn together what business models and technologies are going to make our cities better in the future for all people,” added Alex Fischer, President and CEO of the Columbus Partnership.

The program will be housed at 107 S. High St., with the selected businesses receiving access to co-working space in the building.

The website for potential applicants lists five broad areas of focus for businesses looking to participate:

  • Mobility (including logistics and automated vehicles)
  • Connectivity (including wireless and satellite technologies)
  • Data/Analytics (including artificial intelligence and machine learning)
  • Infrastructure/Energy (including battery technology, charging stations, and “alternative propulsion systems”)
  • Manufacturing/Production (including 3D printing and micro-manufacturing)

“When Columbus won the U.S. Department of Transportation Smart City Challenge, Singularity University wanted to be part of – and contribute to – the innovation ecosystem here,” said Nick Davis, Singularity University Vice President of Corporate Innovation.

The accelerator marks Singularity’s first long-term program outside of its home base in California.

The initial Smart City grant application had a relatively narrow focus – new technology would be used to improve access to transportation and to provide specific benefits for neighborhoods like Linden. Although those ideas are still being pursued, as more partners are brought in and more initiatives get placed under the Smart Columbus umbrella, the scope of the program has grown.

“This accelerator will empower entrepreneurs to leverage breakthroughs in technology, from autonomous vehicles to efficiencies made possible by object awareness, to enhance lives and improve standards of living,” said Rich Langdale, Managing Partner of NCT Ventures. “The Smart Cities initiative is more than a challenge. Civilization is at a turning point and Columbus has the opportunity to promote innovation and pioneer what it means to live in a smart city of the future.”

via ColumbusUnderground.com
Startup Accelerator Announced as Part of Smart Columbus

“Active Shooter” in Texas Sports Bar Meets Good Guy With Gun

A 48-year-old man named James Jones reportedly walked into Zona Caliente Sports Bar in Arlington, Texas, and began yelling. When restaurant manager Cesar Perez attempted to calm him down, he was murdered for his trouble.

Fortunately, there was another armed man in the restaurant at the time. The man, who asked to remain anonymous, was eating at a table with his wife when he saw the above crime occur. Instructing his wife to get down, he stood and shot the killer in the back.

The bad guy then began to fire — but not at anyone in particular.

“I don’t think the [bad guy] even knew where the rounds were coming from because he started shooting at the front door.” — Arlington Police Lieutenant Chris Cook

The murderer was equipped to wreak a lot of havoc, which may have been what he had in mind… aside from the gun he used to kill Perez, he had a second handgun and “two knives.”

Police were supportive of the good Samaritan’s actions:

“We’re thankful that the good ‘Samaritan’ acted quickly and decisively to end the threat,” Cook said. “We never recommend people get involved. That’s a personal decision that a citizen has to make.”

The man who defended the innocent did not want his identity to become public:

The man who took down Jones wished to maintain his anonymity, police said, noting that he felt overwhelmed but relieved that he prevented further violence.

Please join me in applauding this gun-toting man’s fast, decisive action which very likely prevented the death or injury of numerous others in that restaurant.

The post “Active Shooter” in Texas Sports Bar Meets Good Guy With Gun appeared first on AllOutdoor.com.

via All Outdoor
“Active Shooter” in Texas Sports Bar Meets Good Guy With Gun

The art of driving fast on public roads in the 21st century: A how-to

For quite a lot of people, driving is a chore, something they have to do to get to work or the grocery store. And for those drivers, a car is just a tool. But for others, driving is something to be enjoyed. However, it’s getting hard to be a responsible driving enthusiast. There are a number of factors at play here. For one thing, it is becoming more and more socially unacceptable to speed on roads. Cities nationwide are implementing 25mph speed limits, and the evidence coming in shows that does in fact have a measurable effect on pedestrian casualties. But even out of town, the open roads aren’t so empty anymore.

That makes it frustrating for other drivers—who don’t want to contend with Ricky Racer and his Miata pinned to their bumper for miles and miles—and frustrating Ricky, who just wants to have some fun. So the prospect of an Sunday-morning drive through the country starts to become less and less appealing.

My favorite roads

At the same time, most of have a road or two that lives in our memory. For me, it’s my old Californian drive to work through Rancho Santa Fe and the epic backroads that shadowed the 5 as one headed towards La Jolla from North County. Even better was the “Californiaring,” a triangular route of 26.7 miles (44.4km) that took you up Mt Palomar’s 270-degree, hairpin-filled south face then down the faster, flowing east side before taking SR-76 back to start it all over again.

Back in the old days—probably before they even built South Grade—I reckon you could have persuaded the powers that be to let you close the roads for a Californian equivalent of the Targa Florio. A couple of hours from LA, you’d be guaranteed a young hotshot actor or three on the grid, and it could have the makings of a tradition.

In the 21st century though, it seems implausible that you would be allowed to close 28 miles of public highway for a week to run a race where—lets be honest—the chances are someone could get really quite hurt are a possibility.

But I’m wondering if there’s a solution on the way thanks to a combination of autonomous vehicles and racing sims. Now I know what you’re thinking: autonomous vehicles are anathema to the driving enthusiast, taking over the driving completely and leaving the passengers to stare out the window as the scenery goes past. And for those people for whom driving is a chore (or something they can’t do, like the blind or infirm), that’s good.

Racing sims to the rescue?

via Ars Technica
The art of driving fast on public roads in the 21st century: A how-to

Smart Columbus Sandbox giving developers access to Smart City datasets

Columbus wants as much data and analysis as it can get to help it become a smart city – and it’s asking for your help.
The city is making available datasets used in applying for the $40 million federal transportation grant awarded to Columbus last year in the Smart City Challenge. It wants the Smart Columbus Sandbox to be used as a tool for developers to experiment with the data.
The sandbox – you can play around in it – is part of the integrated data exchange, a cloud-based platform that…

via Columbus Business News – Local Columbus News | Business First of Columbus
Smart Columbus Sandbox giving developers access to Smart City datasets

John Oliver reminds us that Net Neutrality is still under siege

John Oliver has again fired off his quick wit at the new FCC Chairman Ajit Pai and the Trump administration for trying to roll back Obama-era Net Neutrality rules.

This isn’t the first time Oliver has addressed the issue of an “open internet,” as he touched on the topic back in 2014 during his fifth episode of Last Week Tonight. In that episode, he identified then-FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler as a dingo. Ring any bells?

This time, Oliver is going after the new Chairman and ISPs to bring to light the effort to roll back net neutrality rules.

For those of us who need a brush up on the matter, it’s rather simple:

ISPs like AT&T, Comcast, Verizon etc. are currently forbidden from favoring one website over another by giving them a “fast lane.” Companies don’t like that. You can obviously imagine a world where Netflix pays a fee to ISPs to be served to its consumers faster than Hulu, limiting consumer choice and killing industry competition across the internet.

It’s this “fast lane” that Oliver seeks to stop.

But we all know Oliver can deliver his own speech far better than I, so without further ado, check out this kick-ass diatribe from the man himself:

The website to which Oliver pushes viewers (http://ift.tt/2plaFGb) seems to be giving the FCC some trouble as the comments form is not loading for certain people. We reached out to the FCC to see if the service issue on its website is related to Oliver’s call to action (of course it is) and if it has been resolved so that people can continue complaining.

We haven’t heard back.

Disclosure: Verizon owns Aol (or Oath?), and Aol owns TechCrunch.

via TechCrunch
John Oliver reminds us that Net Neutrality is still under siege

Popular Mac App Developers Issue Urgent Malware Warning

Image source: Apple

It’s been a rough week in Mac security. First, Checkpoint warned users of a Trojan spreading in Europe that was the first of its kind. And now, one of the most prominent video transcoding apps for Mac has a malware problem.

The developers of the transcoding software Handbrake have issued a statement that warns one of the mirror sites to download the software has been compromised by hackers. The post explains that anyone who has downloaded the software between May 2nd and 6th of this year has a 50/50 chance of being infected. But, it’s probably a good idea just to double check if you’ve downloaded it anytime recently.

Advertisement

Advertisement

According to yesterday’s alert, the installer file on the mirror server download.handbrake.fr (HandBrake-1.0.7.dmg) was replaced by a malicious file. The malware is a variant of OSX.PROTON, it gives a hacker root access privileges to the system. Back in February, Apple had to issue an update to XProtect to account for the original Proton and on Saturday, the company began the process of updating for the this latest variant. It should automatically download for most users.

Here’s how to detect and remove it:

Detection

If you see a process called “Activity_agent” in the OSX Activity Monitor application. You are infected.

For reference, if you’ve installed a HandBrake.dmg with the following checksums, you will also be infected:

SHA1: 0935a43ca90c6c419a49e4f8f1d75e68cd70b274

SHA256: 013623e5e50449bbdf6943549d8224a122aa6c42bd3300a1bd2b743b01ae6793

The Trojan in question is a new variant of OSX.PROTON

Removal

Open up the “Terminal” application and run the following commands:

launchctl unload ~/Library/LaunchAgents/fr.handbrake.activity_agent.plistrm -rf ~/Library/RenderFiles/activity_agent.appif ~/Library/VideoFrameworks/ contains proton.zip, remove the folder

Then Remove any “HandBrake.app” installs you may have.

For the sake of precaution, users should change passwords stored in any OSX or browser keychains. While primary mirror site and the automatic updater on versions 1.0 or later weren’t affected, anyone who uses Handbrake should just make sure.

Sponsored

[Handbrake via MacRumors]


via Lifehacker
Popular Mac App Developers Issue Urgent Malware Warning

How Scratch Is Feeding Hacker Values into Young Minds

Reader mirandakatz writes: It’s the 10th anniversary of Scratch, the kids programming language that’s become a popular tool for training the next generation of minds in computer science. But as Steven Levy writes at Backchannel, Scratch’s real value is how it imparts lessons in sharing, logic, and hackerism: ‘A product of the MIT Media Lab, Scratch is steeped in a complicated set of traditions — everything from educational philosophy to open source activism and the pursuit of artificial life. The underpinnings of this tool subtly, and sometimes not so subtly, convey a set of values through its use… These values include reverence of logic, an unshakeable belief in the power of collaboration, and a celebration of the psychic and tangible rewards of being a maker.’



Share on Google+

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

via Slashdot
How Scratch Is Feeding Hacker Values into Young Minds

The World’s Most Valuable Resource is No Longer Oil, But Data

An oil refinery is an industrial cathedral, a place of power, drama and dark recesses: ornate cracking towers are its gothic pinnacles, flaring gas its stained glass, the stench of hydrocarbons its heady incense. Data centres, in contrast, offer a less obvious spectacle: windowless grey buildings that boast no height or ornament, they seem to stretch to infinity. Yet the two have much in common. From an article on The Economist:

A new commodity spawns a lucrative, fast-growing industry, prompting antitrust regulators to step in to restrain those who control its flow. A century ago, the resource in question was oil. Now similar concerns are being raised by the giants that deal in data, the oil of the digital era (Editor’s note: the link could be paywalled; alternative source). These titans — Alphabet (Google’s parent company), Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Microsoft — look unstoppable. They are the five most valuable listed firms in the world. Their profits are surging: they collectively racked up over $25bn in net profit in the first quarter of 2017. Amazon captures half of all dollars spent online in America. Google and Facebook accounted for almost all the revenue growth in digital advertising in America last year. Such dominance has prompted calls for the tech giants to be broken up, as Standard Oil was in the early 20th century.

via Slashdot
The World’s Most Valuable Resource is No Longer Oil, But Data