Coil Your Extension Cords Like a Roadie with the Over-Under Method

No one understands the value of a properly wound cable more than concert roadies and TV crew professionals, who wrap and unwrap hundreds of feet of cord on a daily basis. Here’s the method they use to keep their shows running on time.

The over-under technique shown above and below is best suited for long cables and as an alternative to wrapping the cord around your elbow and hand. Coil the cord with thumbs facing the same direction then alternate and end the coil with the thumb of your bottom hand facing towards you.

This method eliminates unnecessary twists in the cord and allows the cord to coil in it’s natural state (like it was wrapped from the factory). It also allows the cord or cable to be quickly straightened by either throwing the coil away from your or just pulling on one end.

This Old House also approves of the over-under method and they’ve added a great tip to keep the cord tied together. Wrap a long string around one end of the extension cord near the plug, and after the coiling the cord, tie a bow knot around the entire coil.

They also suggest storing your wound cords in a 5 gallon bucket which will keep them from unraveling. You can also dispense the coil straight from the bucket but cutting a hole on the side of the bucket near the bottom, and pulling the male end of the plug through the hole to plug into the wall. Then pull the length of cord needed straight out of the bucket.

The chain link method is another effective coiling technique and eliminates knots, but it adds more twists and bends to your cord and is not very compact for storage. Check out our advice for wrapping smaller cables while you’re at it.


Workshop is a new blog from Lifehacker all about DIY tips, techniques, and projects. Follow us on Twitter here.


via Lifehacker
Coil Your Extension Cords Like a Roadie with the Over-Under Method

Turn on Tracking Protection in Firefox to Make Pages Load 44% Faster

Turn on Tracking Protection in Firefox to Make Pages Load 44% Faster

Even if you don’t care about the privacy implications of tracking cookies and other technologies sites use to identify us online, you might want to turn on Tracking Protection in Firefox anyway for a potential big speed boost.

Former Mozilla software engineer Monica Chew and Computer Science researcher Georgios Kontaxis took a look at the top 200 news sites (according to Alexa) and found a median 44% reduction in page load time, as well as a 39% reduction in data usage.

Tracking Protection actively blocks domains known to track users. You might not see huge performance benefits for all sites, depending on how much each site relies on third-party content and similar extras from tracking domains. Still, with a range of between 20% and 90% decreased page load times according to the study—and better privacy control—it’s worth a shot.

To turn on Tracking Protection in Firefox:

  1. Type in about:config in the location bar and hit enter.
  2. You’ll see a warning about possibly voiding your warranty. Hit “I’ll be careful, I promise!” to continue.
  3. Search for privacy.trackingprotection.enabled.
  4. Double-click that to toggle the value to true.

You can read the researchers’ paper (PDF) here.

Tracking Protection for Firefox at Web 2.0 Security and Privacy 2015 | Monica at Mozilla via Venture Beat and Boing Boing


via Lifehacker
Turn on Tracking Protection in Firefox to Make Pages Load 44% Faster

What Makes A Database Mature?

Many database vendors would like me to take a look at their products and
consider adopting them for all sorts of purposes. Often they’re pitching
something quite new and unproven as a replacement for mature, boring technology
I’m using happily.
I would consider a new and unproven technology, and I often have. As I’ve
written previously, though, a real evaluation takes a lot of
effort, and that
makes most evaluations non-starters.
Perhaps the most important thing I’m considering is whether the product is
mature. There are different levels of maturity, naturally, but I want to
understand whether it’s mature enough for me to take a look at it. And in that
spirit, it’s worth understanding what makes a database mature.
For my purposes, maturity really means demonstrated capability and quality with
a lot of thought given to all the little things.
The database needs to demonstrate the ability to solve specific problems well and
with high quality. Sometimes this comes from customers, sometimes from a large
user community (who may not be customers).
Here are some things I’ll consider when thinking about a database, in no
particular order.
What problem do I have? It’s easy to fixate on a technology and start
thinking about how awesome it is. Some databases are just easy to fall in love
with, to be frank. Riak is in this category. I get really excited about the
features and capabilities, the elegance. I start thinking of all the things I
could do with Riak. But now I’m putting the cart before the horse. I need to
think about my problems first.
Query flexibility. Does it offer sophisticated execution models to handle
the nuances of real-world queries? If not, I’ll likely run into queries that
run much more slowly than they should, or that have to be pulled into
application code. MySQL has lots of examples of this. Queries such as ORDER
BY with a LIMIT clause, which are super-common for web workloads, did way
more work than they needed to in older versions of MySQL. (It’s better now,
but the scars remain in my mind).
Query flexibility. The downside of a sophisticated execution engine with
smart plans is they can go very wrong. One of the things people like about
NoSQL is the direct, explicit nature of queries, where an optimizer can’t be
too clever for its own good and cause a catastrophe. A database needs to make
up its mind: if it’s simple and direct, OK. If it’s going to be smart, the bar
is very high. A lot of NoSQL databases that offer some kind of “map-reduce”
query capability fall into the middle ground here: key-value works great, but
the map-reduce capability is far from optimal.
Data protection. Everything fails, even things you never think about. Does
it automatically check for and guard against bit rot, bad memory, partial page
writes, and the like? What happens if data gets corrupted? How does it behave?
Backups. How do you back up your data? Can you do it online, without
interrupting the running database? Does it require proprietary tools? If you
can do it with standard Unix tools, there’s infinitely more flexibility. Can
you do partial/selective backups? Differential backups since the last backup?
Restores. How do you restore data? Can you do it online, without taking
the database down? Can you restore data in ways you didn’t plan for when
taking the backup? For example, if you took a full backup, can you efficiently
restore just a specific portion of the data?
Replication. What is the model—synchronous, async, partial, blend?
Statement-based, change-based, log-based, or something else? How flexible is
it? Can you do things like apply intensive jobs (schema changes, big
migrations) to a replica and then trade master-and-replica? Can you filter and
delay and fidget with replication all different ways? Can you write to
replicas? Can you chain replication? Replication flexibility is an absolutely
killer feature. Operating a database at scale is very hard with inflexible
replication. Can you do multi-source replication? If replication breaks, what
happens? How do you recover it? Do you have to rebuild replicas from scratch?
Lack of replication flexibility and operability is still one of the major pain
points in PostgreSQL today. Of course, MySQL’s replication provides a lot of
that flexibility, but historically it didn’t work reliably, and gave users a
huge foot-gun. I’m not saying either is best, just that replication is hard
but necessary.
Write stalls. Almost every new database I’ve seen in my career, and a lot
of old ones, has had some kind of write stalls. Databases are very hard to
create, and typically it takes 5-10 years to fix these problems if they aren’t
precluded from the start (which they rarely are). If you don’t talk about
write stalls in your database in great detail, I’m probably going to assume
you are sweeping them under the rug or haven’t gone looking for them. If you
show me you’ve gone looking for them and either show that they’re contained or
that you’ve solved them, that’s better.
Independent evaluations. If you’re a solution in the MySQL space, for
example, you’re not really serious about selling until you’ve hired Percona to
do evaluations and write up the results. In other database communities, I’d
look for some similar kind of objective benchmarking and evaluations.
Operational documentation. How good is your documentation? How complete?
When I was at Percona and we released XtraBackup, it was clearly a
game-changer, except that there was no documentation for a long time, and this
hurt adoption badly. Only a few people could understand how it worked. There
were only a few people inside of Percona who knew how to set it up and operate
it, for that matter. This is a serious problem for potential adopters. The
docs need to explain important topics like daily operations, what the database
is good at, what weak points it has, and how to accomplish a lot of common
tasks with it. Riak’s documentation is fantastic in this regard. So is MySQL’s
and PostgreSQL’s.
Conceptual documentation. How does it work, really? One database that I
think has been hurt a little bit by not really explaining how-it-works is
NuoDB, which used an analogy of a flock of birds all working together. It’s a
great analogy, but it needs to be used only to set up a frame of reference for
a deep-dive, rather than as a pat answer. (Perhaps somewhat unfairly, I’m
writing this offline, and not looking to see if NuoDB has solved this issue I
remember from years ago.) Another example was TokuDB’s Fractal Tree indexes.
For a long time it was difficult to understand exactly what fractal tree
indexes really did. I can understand why, and I’ve been guilty of the same
thing, but I wasn’t selling a database. People really want to feel sure they
understand how it works before they’ll entrust it with their data, or even
give it a deep look. Engineers, in particular, will need to be convinced that
the database is architected to achieve its claimed benefits.
High availability. Some databases are built for HA, and those need to have
a really clear story around how they achieve it. Walk by the booth of most new
database vendors at a conference and ask them how their automatically HA
solution works, and they’ll tell you it’s elegantly architected for zero
downtime and seamless replacement of failed nodes and so on. But as we know,
these are really hard problems. Ask them about their competition, and they’ll
say “sure, they claim the same stuff, but our code actually works in failure
scenarios, and theirs doesn’t.” They can’t all be right.
Monitoring. What does the database tell me about itself? What can I
observe externally? Most new or emerging databases are basically black boxes.
This makes them very hard to operate in real production scenarios. Most
people building databases don’t seem to know what a good set of
monitoring capabilities even looks like. MemSQL is a notable exception, as is
Datastax Enterprise. As an aside, the astonishing variety of opensource databases
that are not monitorable in a useful way is why I founded VividCortex.
Tooling. It can take a long time for a database’s toolbox to become robust
and sophisticated enough to really support most of the day-to-day development
and operational duties. Good tools for supporting the trickier emergency
scenarios often take much longer. (Witness the situation with MySQL HA tools
after 20 years, for example.) Similarly, established databases often offer
rich suites of tools for integrating with popular IDEs like Visual Studio,
spreadsheets and BI tools, migration tools, bulk import and export, and the like.
Client libraries. Connecting to a database from your language of choice,
using idiomatic code in that language, is a big deal. When we adopted Kafka at
VividCortex, it was tough for us because the client libraries at the time
were basically only mature for Java users. Fortunately, Shopify had
open-sourced their Kafka libraries for Go, but unfortunately they weren’t
mature yet.
Third-party offerings. Sometimes people seem to think that third-party
providers are exclusively the realm of open-source databases, where third
parties are on equal footing with the parent company, but I don’t think this
is true. Both Microsoft and Oracle have enormous surrounding ecosystems of
companies providing alternatives for practically everything you could wish,
except for making source code changes to the database itself. If I have only
one vendor to help me with consulting, support, and other professional
services, it’s a dubious proposition. Especially if it’s a small team that
might not have the resources to help me when I need it most.
The most important thing when considering a database, though, is success
stories. The world is different from a few decades ago, when the good databases
were all proprietary and nobody knew how they did their magic, so proofs of
concept were a key sales tactic. Now, most new databases are opensource and the
users either understand how they work, or rest easy in the knowledge that they
can find out if they want. And most are adopted at a ratio of hundreds of
non-paying users for each paying customer. Those non-paying users are a
challenge for a company in many ways, but at least they’re vouching for the
solution.
Success stories and a community of users go together. If I can choose from a
magical database that claims to solve all kinds of problems perfectly, versus
one that has broad adoption and lots of discussions I can Google, I’m not going
to take a hard look at the former. I want to read online about use cases,
scaling challenges met and solved, sharp edges, scripts, tweaks, tips and
tricks. I want a lot of Stack Exchange discussions and blog posts. I want to see
people using the database for workloads that look similar to mine, as well as
different workloads, and I want to hear what’s good and bad about it.
(Honest marketing helps a lot with this, by the way. If the company’s own claims
match bloggers’ claims, a smaller corpus online is more credible as a
result.)
These kinds of dynamics help explain why most of the fast-growing emerging
databases are opensource. Opensource has an automatic advantage because of free
users vouching for the product. Why would I ever consider a proof-of-concept to
do a sales team a favor, at great cost and effort to myself, when I could use an
alternative database that’s opensource and has an active community discussing
the database? In this environment, the proof of concept selling model is
basically obsolete for the mass market. It may still work for specialized
applications where you’ll sell a smaller number of very pricey deals, but it
doesn’t work in the market of which I’m a part.
In fact, I’ve never responded positively to an invitation to set up a PoC for a
vendor (or even to provide data for them to do it). It’s automatically above my
threshold of effort. I know that no matter what, it’s going to involve a huge
amount of time and effort from me or my teams.
There’s another edge-case—databases that are built in-house at a specific
company and then are kicked out of the nest, so to speak. This is how Cassandra
got started, and Kafka too. But the difference between a database that works
internally for a company (no matter how well it works for them) and one that’s
ready for mass adoption is huge, and you can see that easily in both of those
examples. I suspect few people have that experience to point to, but probably a
lot of readers have released some nifty code sample as open-source and seen how
different it is to create an internal-use library, as opposed to one that’ll be
adopted by thousands or more people.
Remarkably few people at database companies seem to understand the
things I’ve written about above. The ones who do—and I’ve named some of
them—might have great success as a result. The companies who aren’t run by
people who have actually operated databases in their target markets recently,
will probably have a much harder time of it.
I don’t make much time to coach companies on how they should approach me. It’s
not my problem, and I feel no guilt saying no without explanation. (One of my
favorite phrases is “no is a complete sentence.”) But enough companies have
asked me, and I have enough friends at these companies, that I thought it would
be helpful to write this up. Hopefully this serves its intended purpose and
doesn’t hurt any feelings. Please use the comments to let me know if I can
improve this post.
Bristlecone pine by
yenchao, roots by
mclcbooks
via Planet MySQL
What Makes A Database Mature?

The Sun’s Magnetic Field Has Never Looked So Good

The Sun's Magnetic Field Has Never Looked So Good

In photographs taken in the spectrum of visible light, the Sun’s magnetic field is invisible. But this image wasn’t taken in our familiar, visible wavelengths, which is why the Sun’s magnetic field is both apparent and beautiful.

The bright white strands in this image are called coronal loops; they’re the lines of the Sun’s magnetic field passing through the corona, the outer layer of gas around the Sun. The blue and yellow patches show the two opposite polarities of the magnetic field.

NASA combined data from two advanced instruments aboard NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory to produce this dramatic image, with color added to make the image clearer. The Atmospheric Imaging Assembly, which creates images of the solar atmosphere in 10 different wavelengths every 10 seconds, imaged the coronal loops, while the blue and yellow magnetic field images came from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager. The overlay provides a striking look at the invisible force of the Sun’s magnetic field.

[NASA]

Image Credit: NASA SDO

via Gizmodo
The Sun’s Magnetic Field Has Never Looked So Good

The Trillion Fold Increase In Computing Power, Visualized

The Trillion Fold Increase In Computing Power, Visualized

It’s easy to get hung up over the imperfections in our technology (srsly Apple, is it that hard to give a phone a back button?) and forget just how astounding modern processing power is. A community of IT professionals called Experts Exchange has now produced a fascinating infographic to remind us.

Top image: Watch as the size of hard disk drives shrinks while storage capacity increases from 1956 to 2015.

The visualization below, inspired by the recent 50th anniversary of Moore’s law, tells the story of the trillion fold increase in computing performance we’ve witnessed over the past sixty years. That’s impressive enough, but some of the other finds are downright astounding. The Apollo guidance computer that took early astronauts to the moon, for instance, has the processing power of 2 Nintendo Entertainment Systems, while the Cray-2 supercomputer from 1985—the fastest machine in the world for its time—roughly measures up to an iPhone 4.

Plenty of interesting insights to be found here. You can check out Expert Exchange’s original post for more info on their sources and methodology.

The Trillion Fold Increase In Computing Power, Visualized


Follow Maddie on Twitter or contact her at maddie.stone@gizmodo.com

via Gizmodo
The Trillion Fold Increase In Computing Power, Visualized

Here’s A Detailed Walk Through Of How JPEG Compression Works

Understanding the science behind JPEG compression might not be on everyone’s agenda. In fact, it probably sounds incredibly boring, if not complicated to a lot of folks. But, in this 12-minute long clip, image analyst Mike Pound guides you through the entire process as he explains the magic of Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT)–using language that’s easy to […]

The post Here’s A Detailed Walk Through Of How JPEG Compression Works appeared first on DIY Photography.


via DIYPhotography.net -Hacking Photography, One Picture At A Time
Here’s A Detailed Walk Through Of How JPEG Compression Works

To-Do List: Apply For The TC Pitch-Offs In Austin And Seattle!

14394608374_090d4cd343_k It’s shaping up to be one amazing summer, and the week we’re most excited about here at TechCrunch is the week we hit up the wonderful cities of Austin and Seattle, on June 23 and June 25 respectively. We’ll be hosting the world-renowned TC Pitch-Off in both cities, selecting around ten startups to pitch their products in sixty seconds or less to a panel of local VCs and… Read More


via TechCrunch
To-Do List: Apply For The TC Pitch-Offs In Austin And Seattle!

Top 10 Smart Ways to Organize and Upgrade Your Garage

Top 10 Smart Ways to Organize and Upgrade Your Garage

The garage is often a neglected, messy space. With a little organization and a few handy projects, though, we can get much more use out of our garages and also modernize them. Here are our top 10 garage upgrade ideas.

10. Install a Ceiling Storage System

Top 10 Smart Ways to Organize and Upgrade Your Garage

Make better use of your garage’s space and get things off the floor with this DIY project. It costs about $75 for all of the materials and is a great way to store seldom-used things like holiday decorations.

9. Store Garden Tools and Other Supplies Smartly on the Wall

Top 10 Smart Ways to Organize and Upgrade Your Garage

With just two boards and a saw you can make this simple tool rack for your wall. For smaller tools, there’s always the trusty pegboard (and alternatives.) If you have a lot of tools, perhaps a hinged pegboard system is for you or this rolling pegboard caddy.

8. Make a Wall-Mounted, Folding Workbench

Top 10 Smart Ways to Organize and Upgrade Your Garage

If your garage is tight on space but you still want to use it as your workspace, this DIY wall-mounted foldable workbench not only stores your tools but also provides project space on an as-needed basis.

7. Upgrade Your Garage Workshop with Simple DIY Projects

Top 10 Smart Ways to Organize and Upgrade Your Garage

You don’t have to spend a fortune to improve your garage workshop. A sheet metal workbench cover, PVC drawer organizers, and custom storage pieces could go a long way towards making your garage a nicer place to DIY. You can also build your own garage storage shelves for under $50 or turn an old file cabinet into a garden tools storage unit.

6. Create an Entire Storage Wall System

Top 10 Smart Ways to Organize and Upgrade Your Garage

Or perhaps go whole hog and turn all of your wall space into a storage system to hold everything from your tools to your garden hose and ladder. The best part of this project is you can customize it exactly for your storage needs.

5. Make Parking in the Garage Easier with Clever Uses

Top 10 Smart Ways to Organize and Upgrade Your Garage

It only takes one experience knocking over a bike or banging the car door into the wall to do some damage. The versatile pool noodle can protect your car door from your wall. You can also make your own $10 garage parking bumper so you’ll never drive too far into the garage. Alternately, hang a tennis ball from your garage ceiling so you’ll always pull in to just the right spot.

4. Use Your Garage for More Than Just Storing Stuff

Top 10 Smart Ways to Organize and Upgrade Your Garage

If you’ve got room in your garage and somewhere else to park the car, consider converting that space into more than just a storage space. The photo above shows the office half of a 2-car garage. Offices set in garages can look surprisingly like a regular home office. If you don’t need office space, perhaps you’d like to turn your garage into a home gym.

3. Monitor Your Garage Door’s Opened or Closed Status

Top 10 Smart Ways to Organize and Upgrade Your Garage

Forgetting to close the garage door can be dangerous, when thieves and animals are on the prowl. Make your own garage door indicator light so you can see with a glance from indoors if your garage door is open. Alternatively, you can build an open an open garage alert system with an old RC car and controller or monitor your door’s status with your phone and a sensor system.

2. Open Your Garage Door with Your Phone

When you do want your garage door open, your phone can be the remote. Siri and a Raspberry Pi make the magic happen for iPhone users, while a Bluetooth board and a free app do the job on Android. (The latter project also remotely starts your car with your phone!)

1. Organize Your Garage into Zones

Top 10 Smart Ways to Organize and Upgrade Your Garage

You likely have multiple uses for your garage and a variety of things to store there. Divide that space into six distinct zones and it’ll be easier to find things and put them away faster. And maybe even have room in your garage for your car.

Illustration by Tina Mailhot-Roberge.


Lifehacker’s Weekend Roundup gathers our best guides, explainers, and other posts on a certain subject so you can tackle big projects with ease. For more, check out our Weekend Roundup and Top 10 tags.


via Lifehacker
Top 10 Smart Ways to Organize and Upgrade Your Garage

OSU salary database, updated for 2015

Here is our annual update on Ohio State University salaries.
Some notes on the data:
You can search by employee name, department or title. Searches by dollar amount will return any results at that level and higher. The results column you likely want is Total, which includes pay from all sources. The Regular column, according to OSU, "represents the pay that comes from base salary. It represents standard hours (full-time equivalent) worked plus paid leave taken according to our leave plans/policies.…

via Columbus Business News – Local Columbus News | Business First of Columbus
OSU salary database, updated for 2015

The Groundbreaking History Of Star Wars Toys

The Groundbreaking History Of Star Wars Toys

When Star Wars released in 1977, the face of science fiction in popular culture was changed forever — but a year later, the movie helped transform the toy industry as well. Since then, Star Wars and the toys it inspired have been forever linked, a story that can just as easily be told through figures as it can the films.

Top image from the cover of Stephen J. Sansweet’s Star Wars: The Ultimate Action Figure Collection.

An Unexpected Alliance

When George Lucas and 20th Century Fox were trying to market Star Wars, they planned for something almost entirely unprecedented at the time — a marketing deluge, and a full scale licensing project that would see t-shirts, posters, lunchboxes and yes, toys, covered in the movie’s characters, hit shelves. In a move that, in hindsight, was incredibly shrewd, Lucas negotiated with Fox to take the bulk of revenue from merchandise sales, with neither side believing that the movie’s tepid response before release could lead to much in terms of profit.

The lukewarm reaction spread to licensees too. Lucasfilm and Fox first offered the Mego Corporation — whose 8” licensed dolls of DC superheroes, Star Trek and more had made them one of the most powerful toy makers of the 1970’s — the deal to create Star Wars dolls, but the company passed, unimpressed by the movie. After attempting to shop the license around to other toy makers, in 1976 it fell to Kenner, then a subsidiary of General Mills. Kenner President Bernie Loomis saw an opportunity to make good toys with the license (especially in the then relatively new space of 3.75” scaled action figures, cheaper to produce than the larger toys), but expected Star Wars to be a fleeting venture for the company.

Little did anyone involved know how wrong they would be.

The Early Bird Gets The Gift Certificate

The Groundbreaking History Of Star Wars Toys

Star Wars released in May 1977 to rapturous approval, becoming an overnight sensation — and kids didn’t just want to see the movie; they wanted toys. Kenner were caught flat-footed at the demand, finding that they wouldn’t even have figures out for the lucrative Christmas period of that year. To do nothing would have meant losing out on millions of dollars.

So they made a decision that was, by all accounts at the time, completely ludicrous: They sold people an empty box. The Early Bird Certificate was a box containing a cardboard display stand featuring the characters from the film, stickers, and a certificate for kids to mail away to Kenner to receive four figures in 1978: Luke Skywalker, R2-D2, Princess Leia and Chewbacca. The box was savaged by the media, and although sales were poor, the move kept Star Wars figures in the public’s mind, ready for their 1978 release.

Your First Step Into A Larger World

The Groundbreaking History Of Star Wars Toys

When the Star Wars line first hit in 1978, any damage that criticism of the Early Bird Certificate could have done was wiped out almost instantaneously. Joined by another eight figures, and with playsets and vehicles following later in the year, Kenner’s toyline was a smash success, making over $100 million in its first year alone — with demand often outstripping supply. Kenner’s toy line became the icon of the new era of 3.75” figures.

The following year, the company capitalised on the announcement of a sequel, The Empire Strikes Back, with another mail-away campaign: one that proved to be far more controversial than the Early Bird Cerificate.

In the new promotion, kids could mail four proofs of purchase from any Star Wars figure and get a sneak peek of a new Empire toy, the mysterious bounty hunter Boba Fett, who had made his first appearance the year prior in the infamously atrocious Star Wars Holiday Special. The figure came with a heavily advertised rocket-firing jetpack feature, but shortly before Boba Fett went to market, a rash of health-and-safety fears caused Kenner to make a late decision to glue the rocket into the backpack securely. Kenner has always maintained that they never released a rocket-firing Fett into the wild, but several such figures (as well as early production prototypes) have made their way into the hands of collectors over the years, making it one of the most valuable Star Wars toys ever made, selling for upwards of $2000 when one appears at auction.

By the release of Return of the Jedi, the line had expanded to contain 79 figures, with oodles of playsets, vehicles and creatures released. But without movies to support them, sales slowly began to dwindle. Kenner attempted to offset the decline with brief lines based on the animated Droids and Ewok cartoons, the first non-movie Star Wars toys ever made, but it was too late. In 1985, after 250 million Star Wars figures had been shipped over the world, Kenner ended the toyline. Plans were even made for a spinoff line the following year, The Epic Continues, featuring new characters based on a storyline created by Kenner in an attempt to reignite interest in the toys, but Lucasfilm rejected the move. For now, Star Wars as a toyline was over.

A New Hope

The Groundbreaking History Of Star Wars Toys

But it only took a decade for that to all change. By the mid 1990s, George Lucas had announced his intent to create three brand new Star Wars films, prequel movies to the originals, and specially remastered editions of the classic trilogy were being prepared to hit cinemas once again. Kenner, now owned by Hasbro, decided to capitalise on the excitement surrounding Star Wars by going back and creating new figures, a spiritual sequel to the Power of the Force Line that ended the original toyline in 1985.

The figures were a massive success, but collectors and fans of the original figures were appalled. The initial Hasbro/Kenner toys — published under the Kenner name rather than Hasbro to capitalise on nostalgia — only included one extra piece of articulation (they could turn at the waist), but more egregious was what Hasbro had dubbed the “Hero Age” sculpts. The initial figures were muscled up to the point where they were unrecognisable (even Princess Leia, whose figure was quickly dubbed “Monkey Leia” by fans for her awkward pose and poor face sculpt) and with a weirdly wide-legged stance that made it impossible to get the figures to properly sit in vehicles and ships.

But nevertheless, the new figures were immensely popular, spurred by the release of the Special Editions. Hasbro upped production on the Star Wars line once more, and even began incorporating elements of the then-fledgling Expanded Universe. Characters from the original Kenner line like Yak Face and Hammerhead were given their EU-sourced names (Saelt-Marae and Momaw Nadon, respectively), and for the first time, characters from the novels and video games were turned into toys, like Emperor’s Hand Mara Jade, or the bulky Dark Troopers from Star Wars: Dark Forces.

The Phantom Preview

The Groundbreaking History Of Star Wars Toys

But Hasbro’s focus on the original movies soon gave way to the insane anticipation for The Phantom Menace. This time, they opted not to go for a mail-away campaign. Instead, in an unprecedented move, they sold two new toys in 1998 to stoke excitement for the film: a figure of Samuel L. Jackson’s Mace Windu (complete with a blue lightsaber, ahead of the character getting a purple saber in Attack of the Clones) and a deluxe figure of a Battle Droid on a STAP speeder bike. Both figures came in special packaging, teasing the release of The Phantom Menace in 1999, and gave fans some of the first proper looks at new characters. They were lapped up over the year, and excitement for Phantom Menace toys reached fever pitch.

Aside from a surge in popularity due to the new movie, Hasbro decided to tie the toy line closer to the films by ditching the “Hero Age” sculpts, opting for a neutral and more naturally-bodied stance. The Phantom Menace figures also came with a voice chip accessory that, when used with a separate toy based on Jedi Master Qui-Gonn Jinn’s communicator from the film, played lines of dialogue from the films.

Attack Of The Super-Articulated Clones

The Groundbreaking History Of Star Wars Toys

But despite the success of the new toy line, and an invigorated public interest in Star Wars merchandise thanks to new movies coming out, Hasbro faced pressure to evolve the toy line even further. A common critique was the figures’ lack of articulation, something that had hardly changed since the original Kenner days, compared to other figures on the market — something Hasbro decided to rectify with their Attack of the Clones line in 2002. The first ever “super articulated” Star Wars toy, a Clone Trooper, went on sale in 2004, and was so popular the figure continued to be a part of Star Wars lines for the next half a decade.

Hasbro brought the increased articulation to a wider range of figures for its Revenge of the Sith toy line in 2005. Although excitement over the prequel saga had diminished since the late ‘90s, Hasbro made a huge push with what it thought could be the final years of the Star Wars toy line. As with The Phantom Menace toys before them, sneak preview figures were released (General Grievous, Utapaun politician Tion Medon, a Wookiee warrior and the R4-G9 astromech droid), but Hasbro also pushed midnight releases of the product line across US toy stores, encouraging fans to queue up in costume and celebrate the release of the toys.

Black And Blue

The Groundbreaking History Of Star Wars Toys

Despite the lack of a new movie to keep fans interested, the Star Wars toy line did not come to an end as Hasbro had feared. The success of the Revenge of the Sith toy line, mainly thanks to the improved sculpting and articulation it included, spurred Hasbro to go back to the previous films and make new figures that included the extra articulation and detail (they also added premium features like cloth clothing — earlier toys sculpted clothes out of plastic, and in the case of the first Kenner figures, vinyl sheets were used for cloaks and robes) they had previously lacked. The figure line would then be bolstered by the announcement of a new animated series, Star Wars: Clone Wars in 2008, but by and large Hasbro’s Star Wars line closed out the 2000s in relative normality.

However, times were changing in the toy industry. Action figure popularity was on the decline (in favour of an emphasis on construction toys, like Mega Bloks and Lego), and the rising price of oil had a severe impact on manufacturing costs. The heavily detailed and articulated figures that Star Wars had become known for were becoming too expensive to produce.

Instead of cancelling the line however, Hasbro made the decision to split it in two. For the first time in Star Wars toy history, figures would be produced in the 6” scale. Announced in 2013 and dubbed “The Black Series,” these figures would keep the high articulation and improved detailing and be aimed solely at the collectors market, with higher prices to match (prices doubling from the usual $10-12 to $20-25).

The Black Series, however, came at the cost of the long running 3.75” line. Now aimed solely at younger children instead of trying to balance between appealing to kids and diehard collectors, Hasbro decided to cut the super articulation and detailing introduced 8 years prior with Revenge of the Sith to keep costs down. Many fans bemoaned the end of an era, but with Hasbro’s Star Wars toys grossing nearly six billion dollars since 1995, there was plenty proof out there that there was still an audience for both kinds of toys.

The Merchandising Awakens

The Groundbreaking History Of Star Wars Toys

So where does that leave us in 2015? With a new era of Star Wars movie making upon us —following Disney’s acquisition of the Star Wars license and Episode VII on the way this December — toys will once again play an important role in how fans discover the new Star Wars universe. As it was with The Phantom Menace and Revenge of the Sith, the toys will be part of the earliest looks fans will see of the new movie (outside of teaser trailers, of course) when The Force Awakens merchandise is launched on September 4th, as part of a heavily marketed “Force Friday” celebration. Three months ahead of the film may sound unbelievable to most, but as we’ve seen in Star Wars’ own past, it’s rather restrained.

Even with nearly 40 years between the Early Bird Certificate and these new toys, the relationship between Star Wars and its action figures is stronger than ever.

via Gizmodo
The Groundbreaking History Of Star Wars Toys