FBI Report: Crime in the US Shows Rifles Rarely Used to Murder

The FBI recently released its annual report Crime in the United States. For the second consecutive year, the estimated number of violent crimes in the country decreased. In 2018, violent crime fell 3.3 percent, while property crime dropped 6.3 percent. This marks the 16 consecutive year those estimates declined.

Personal Defense World August - Sept 2019

RELATED STORY

Personal Defense World Brings Facts: More Guns, Less Crime

FBI Crime Report on Guns

The violent crime rate fell 3.9 percent when compared with the rate in 2017. Meanwhile, property crime declined 6.9 percent in the same comparison.

While crimes fell in most areas and categories, non-negligent manslaughter offenses fell 6.2 percent. Meanwhile, the estimated volume of aggravated assault offenses decreased by 0.4 percent.

But interestingly, for gun owners, how guns came to be used by murderers proves even more interesting. In 2018, 14,123 murders occurred, 10,265 which used a firearm. Of those 10,265 murders, 6,603 reportedly took place with a handgun. Meanwhile, only 297 murders utilized a rifle. A shotgun was used 235 times to commit a murder.

In the national discourse on firearms currently taking place, the semi-auto “assault rifle” gets portrayed as the scourge of American society. But the FBI data simply doesn’t support that claim. While even one murder is too many, the data shows that gun control advocates aren’t proposing to save lives. It’s something else entirely. Otherwise, enemy number one would be the handgun. That’s what the data says.

Or possibly they should turn their attention to knives. Criminals used knives to murder 1,515 victims in 2018. Meanwhile, blunt objects, listed as “clubs, hammers, etc.” took 443 lives. Stunningly, personal weapons, “hands, fists, feet, etc.” killed 672 lives in 2018.

We live in a data-driven, analytical age. From stocks to sports, to the news you read, analytics drives the decision making. Except when it comes to gun control. Because even though handguns, knives, clubs, hammers and even feet take more lives than rifles, it’s the “assault rifle” that must be banned.

It’s not about saving lives for gun control advocates. And it never has been.

The post FBI Report: Crime in the US Shows Rifles Rarely Used to Murder appeared first on Personal Defense World.

via Personal Defense World
FBI Report: Crime in the US Shows Rifles Rarely Used to Murder

Daily Gun Deals: Primary Arms’ Bargain Bin Highlights, AR Gun Parts Starting at $3.99

Primary Arms' Bargain Bin Highlights, AR Gun Parts Deal
Primary Arms’ Bargain Bin Highlights, AR Gun Parts Deal

USA – -(Ammoland.com)- Primary Arms has some great buys on useful gun parts for rifle builders with AR rifles parts starting at just $3.99 while inventory lasts. Check out the highlights below and jump on multiples of ones you use over and over while prices are inexpensive.  Primary is buying these in bulk from Radical Firearms and passing along the savings, many of these are exclusive deals only found at Primary Arms. Below is our top eight picks. If you don’t like our selection you can check out the rest at the buy now button.Buy Now Gun Deals

Daily Gun Deals: Primary Arms’ Bargain Bin Highlights, AR Gun Parts Starting at $3.99

Radical Firearms backstory videos:

Daily Gun Deals are short-term bargains that will often expire or sell out fast! The AmmoLand News Team publishes these deals that are available from our trusted partners and well-known industry retailers. AmmoLand does not stock inventory or have a shopping cart, we simply bring you up-to-date information on deals as a way to help you the reader get the most bang for your buck. As always we try and bring you the best information possible but these are fast-moving deals and details change quickly so be sure and check prices and product information for yourself by following the above links.

If you want us to email you each daily gun deal, subscribe to our daily emails list.

Click here to see more Daily Deals!
Click here to see more Daily Deals!

Ammoland Editors are scouring the web to find you the deal that will save you money. So good are these deals that they do not last long so pay attention to the publish date and do not delay, take advantage of this deal as soon as we publish it for our readers.

Consider checking our Gun Deals Coupon page and our past featured Daily Gun Deals page for additional savings from your favorite industry partners. Thank you very much for your support and I hope we save you some money by highlighting these sweet daily deals. Enjoy!

The post Daily Gun Deals: Primary Arms’ Bargain Bin Highlights, AR Gun Parts Starting at $3.99 appeared first on AmmoLand.com.

via AmmoLand.com
Daily Gun Deals: Primary Arms’ Bargain Bin Highlights, AR Gun Parts Starting at $3.99

This Intuitive Platform Makes Email Marketing Easy

Any business worth their salt needs to have a reliable email marketing strategy. Digital marketing may be evolving but email is still one of today’s most viable marketing channels. Still, it can be difficult to build a robust email strategy given the high prices of many platforms and the technical expertise needed to code your own emails. That’s where Sender.net comes in.

This automated email marketing software comes with an enormous gallery of pre-built templates and tools to help you create professional-looking emails without writing any HTML or navigating confusing settings. The intuitive, drag-and-drop email builder allows you to customize emails to fit your brand or messaging and automate when they’ll be sent to save you tons of time. With built-in email analytics, you’ll be able to quickly determine what is and what isn’t working so you can adjust your strategy on the fly to optimize results. Their streamlined deliverability and dedicated IPs avoid spam folders so you can rest assured your emails are always getting through to your list.

Other platforms may cost you hundreds. Sender.net is currently offering 50k email credits for 57% off the normal $114 price. That’s just $49.

Read the full article: This Intuitive Platform Makes Email Marketing Easy

via MakeUseOf.com
This Intuitive Platform Makes Email Marketing Easy

100-Loop Marble Run

100-Loop Marble Run

Link

Scott’s Marble Runs knows a thing or two about making really long tracks for his marbles to zoom down. This time, he created an epic, multi-story run that has dozens upon dozens of loops, and relies heavily on gravity to make it work. Nice catch there at the end too, Scott.

via The Awesomer
100-Loop Marble Run

How a Drinking Bird Works

How a Drinking Bird Works

Link

If you’ve ever played with one of those drinking bird toys, you know it can be quite fascinating to watch as it dunks its beak in and out of a glass of water. Engineerguy Bill Hammack pops off the bird’s festive blue hat to explain the thermodynamics which make the nearly endless fun happen.

via The Awesomer
How a Drinking Bird Works

SQL CONCAT_WS Function Example | CONCAT_WS Method In SQL

SQL CONCAT_WS Function Example | CONCAT_WS Method In SQL

SQL CONCAT_WS Function Example | CONCAT_WS Method In SQL is today’s topic. The SQL CONCAT_WS function is used to join two or more expressions separated by a separator. It takes up to 255 input strings which are further joined by a function. If we want to perform the join operation, CONCAT requires at least 2 strings. If it is provided with only 1 string, it will raise the error.

SQL CONCAT_WS Function

If any non-character string values are passed into the function, it will be implicitly converted to the strings before concatenating.

If NULL is added to the function, it converts it into the empty string with VARCHAR (1).

See the following syntax.

SELECT CONCAT_WS (separator, expression1, expression2, expression3…)

Parameters

Separator

This is the separator that is added between more than one expression. If the separator is NULL, then the function will return NULL.

expression1, expression2, expression3…:

These are the expressions that will be concatenated.

See the following example. We are using SQL SELECT Statement.

SELECT CONCAT_WS ('.', 'AppDividend', 'com');

Output

AppDividend.com

Explanation

Here “.” acts as a separator and is added between AppDividend and com.

See the following code.

SELECT CONCAT_WS (',', 1, 2, NULL, NULL, 3);

Output

1, 2, 3

Explanation

The above example demonstrated how concat_ws() function deals with NULL values. Here, the NULL values were ignored, and no separator was added between them.

Above were all the common examples to make clear how the Concat function works.

Let’s see the example with proper tables.

Consider table Employee.

Emp_id First_name Last_name City State Salary
101 Rohit Raj Patna Bihar 30000
201 Shivam Rana Jalandhar Punjab 20000
301 Karan Kumar Allahabad Uttar Pradesh 40000
401 Suraj Bhakat Kolkata West Bengal 60000
501 Akash Cherukuri Vizag Andhra Pradesh 70000

 

Now, suppose we want the full name of an employee from this table. Then, the following query has to be executed.

Query

Select First_name, Last_name, concat_ws(‘ ’, First_name, Last_Name) 
AS Full_name from Employee;

Output

First_name Last_name Full_name
Rohit Raj Rohit Raj
Shivam Rana Shivam Rana
Karan Kumar Karan Kumar
Suraj Bhakat Suraj Bhakat
Akash Cherukuri Akash Cherukuri

 

Here you can see that the full name of the employee is displayed separated by a separator which was space.

The CONCAT_WS() function joins the input strings into the single string.

It separates those concatenated strings with a separator particular in the first argument.

One thing to note that the CONCAT_WS() requires at least two input strings.

It means that if we pass zero or one input string argument, the function will raise the error.

The CONCAT_WS() function treats NULL as the empty string of type VARCHAR().

It also does not add a separator between NULLs.

Therefore, a CONCAT_WS() function can cleanly join the strings that may have blank values.

Use CONCAT_WS() function with table columns

The following statement uses the CONCAT_WS() function to join the values in the last_name and first_name columns of the sales.customer table.

It separates the last name and first name by the comma (,) and space.

SELECT 
    first_name, 
    last_name, 
    CONCAT_WS(', ', last_name, first_name) full_name
FROM 
    sales.customers
ORDER BY 
    first_name, 
    last_name;

Use CONCAT_WS() Function with NULL

The following statement indicates how the CONCAT_WS() function handles input strings that have NULL values.

SELECT 
    CONCAT_WS(',', 1, 2, NULL, NULL, 3);

The output is as follows:

result
----------------------------------------
1,2,3
 
(1 row affected)

As you can see from the above output, the CONCAT_WS() function ignores NULL and don’t add the separator between the NULL values.

The following example concatenates the customer data to format customer’s addresses. If the customer does not have a phone number, that function ignores it.

SELECT 
    CONCAT_WS
    (
        CHAR(13), 
        CONCAT(first_name, ' ', last_name), 
        phone, 
        CONCAT(city, ' ', state), 
        zip_code,
        '---'
    ) customer_address
FROM 
    sales.customers
ORDER BY 
    first_name, 
    last_name;

Using CONCAT_WS() to generate CSV file

This statement uses the comma (,) as a separator and concatenates values in the first_name, last_name, and email column to generate the CSV file.

See the following query.

SELECT 
    CONCAT_WS(',', first_name, last_name, email)
FROM 
    sales.customers
ORDER BY 
    first_name, 
    last_name;

So, In this tutorial, you have learned how to use the SQL CONCAT_WS() function to concatenate strings with a separator.

Finally, SQL CONCAT_WS Function Example is over.

Recommended Posts

SQL DIFFERENCE Function Example

SQL LIKE Operator Tutorial With Example

Understand SQL Constraints

SQL Operators Tutorial With Example

SQL Except Clause Example

The post SQL CONCAT_WS Function Example | CONCAT_WS Method In SQL appeared first on AppDividend.

via Planet MySQL
SQL CONCAT_WS Function Example | CONCAT_WS Method In SQL

MySQL Workbench 8.0.18 has been released

Dear MySQL users,

The MySQL developer tools team announces 8.0.18 as our General Availability

(GA) for MySQL Workbench 8.0.

For the full list of changes in this revision, visit

http://dev.mysql.com/doc/relnotes/workbench/en/changes-8-0.html

For discussion, join the MySQL Workbench Forums:

http://forums.mysql.com/index.php?152

The release is now available in source and binary form for a number of

platforms from our download pages at:

http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/tools/workbench/

Enjoy!

via Planet MySQL
MySQL Workbench 8.0.18 has been released

The ATF’s Definition of an AR-15 Lower as a ‘Firearm’ Is In Serious Trouble

Joseph Roh ATF AR-15 rifle

Courtesy ATF and CNN

First, credit where it’s due. CNN’s Scott Glover has managed to turn out an excellent article about a fairly arcane aspect of guns and firearms law while getting the details right. That’s a notable feat for legacy media these days. Read the whole thing here.

With that out of the way, the criminal prosecution — aborted though it was — that Glover has written about is worthy of note and could make the ATF’s job of regulating AR-15 sales going forward extremely difficult. CNN’s article is titled, He sold illegal AR-15s. Feds agreed to let him go free to avoid hurting gun control efforts.

Here are the particulars. A Southern California man named Joseph Roh produced 80% AR-15 lowers and complete rifles, some of which he allegedly sold without a manufacturer’s license, and some allegedly to prohibited persons. At least a few of the guns he sold were used in crimes including an 80% lower that was used as the basis for a rifle build used in a 2013 spree shooting in Santa Monica.

The ATF had been watching Roh for years and mounted a sting operation against him in 2014. They sent undercover agents into his south LA machine shop where he was holding what were basically “build parties” where customers finished lowers and assembled completed rifles.

Roh was eventually arrested and charged with running an unlicensed firearms manufacturing operation. But none of that is the interesting part of the story.

The aspect that’s worthy of your attention — and is no doubt giving the ATF nightmares — is the argument that Roh’s attorney made in successfully defending his client.

As you probably know, the only part of an AR-15 that’s legally considered a firearm is the lower receiver. That’s the part that’s serialized and requires a background check to purchase (unless you buy an 80% lower and finish it yourself, but that’s another story).

Joseph Roh was smart enough to hire a good attorney, Gregory Nicolaysen. Nicolaysen did his homework and actually read the federal statue that lays out what constitutes — legally speaking — a firearm. When Roh’s case came to trial in 2018 . . .

Nicolaysen argued that the definition of a receiver under the relevant federal code differed in various ways from the AR-15 component Roh was accused of manufacturing.

Under the US Code of Federal Regulations, a firearm frame or receiver is defined as: “That part of a firearm which provides housing for the hammer, bolt or breechblock, and firing mechanism, and which is usually threaded at its forward portion to receive the barrel.” (emphasis added)

The lower receiver in Roh’s case does not have a bolt or breechblock and is not threaded to receive the barrel, Nicolaysen noted.

And neither does any other AR-15 lower receiver. Where most firearms have a monolithic receiver that meets the definition under federal law, an AR has a split receiver, an upper and a lower. Neither component, strictly speaking, meets the definition of a frame or receiver that is explicitly laid out in the law.

In effect, Nicolaysen argued that the ATF’s interpretation of federal law that they’ve been using to deem AR-15 lowers as legal firearms is wrong…and has been since, well, forever.

(Nicolaysen) called the decision to classify it as a firearm nonetheless, the result of “secret, in-house decision-making.”

Nicolaysen accused the ATF of abusing its authority by pursuing Roh based on his alleged violation of a policy “that masquerades as law.”

Roh’s case was heard in a bench trial (at his option) in which only the judge hears the evidence and renders a verdict. US District Court Judge James V. Selna deliberated for a year and then wrote a tentative order in April.

Selna agreed with Roh’s argument that the ATF’s definition of an AR-15 lower as a firearm is faulty.

That, no doubt, set off alarm bells from LA to DC. If the ruling were allowed to stand, that would set a very inconvenient precedent, one that would make AR-15 lowers like any other part of an AR platform rifle…just another gun part that could be made and sold through the mail to just about anyone. No serial number or background check needed.

The ATF couldn’t let that stand, so prosecutors reached a plea deal with Roh.

Selna did find that Roh was guilty of selling completed firearms without a license, subjecting him to a possible prison sentence.

Following Selna’s tentative order, the prosecution and defense agreed to a deal in which Roh would plead guilty to the charge against him, but would be allowed to withdraw that plea if he stayed out of trouble for a year. Prosecutors would then dismiss the case. If Roh abides by the deal, he will have no criminal conviction and serve no time behind bars.

And there would be no legal precedent.

Sources familiar with the agreement said prosecutors wanted to strike a deal in order to prevent Selna’s order from becoming permanent, drawing publicity, and creating case law that could hamper ATF enforcement efforts.

They basically let Roh walk in order to preserve the current fiction under which the ATF regulates AR-15 sales.

As for “drawing publicity,” CNN has done a good job of that with their story. And, as Glover points out, Roh’s case wasn’t the first time a similar argument had been successfully used.

Federal law enforcement officials — and members of Congress — have been on notice about a potential problem with the language in federal gun law as applied to AR-15s since at least 2016.

In July of that year, prosecutors in Northern California abandoned a case against a convicted felon named Alejandro Jimenez after a judge found that the AR-15 lower receiver he was accused of purchasing in an ATF undercover sting did not meet the definition of a receiver under the law.

The ruling and subsequent dismissal drew little notice but prompted a letter to Congress from then-US Attorney General Loretta Lynch. She advised lawmakers that the judge’s decision was not suitable for appeal and that if ATF officials believed the definition should be changed, they should pursue regulatory or administrative action.

You can read the court’s findings in the Jimenez case here (PDF) sent to us by an attorney friend of TTAG. Note in particular the areas highlighted in yellow.

So the government has known that the ATF is using a faulty interpretation of federal law to regulate the sale of AR-15 lowers for decades now. And the deal they cut in the Roh prosecution doesn’t change that in the slightest.

“AR-15s, as we speak today, do not have a receiver by the definition of the existing law and that’s a huge issue,” (Nicolaysen) said. “It shows that the laws are obsolete and they’re out of sync with the realities of today’s firearms market.”

(Adam) Winkler, the UCLA law professor, offered a similar assessment.

When he was first informed of the judge’s tentative order by a CNN reporter, Winkler said, “I thought the logic was crazy.”

But after reviewing the order and several filings in the case at the request of CNN, he said Selna’s rationale appeared legally sound.

“It does seem like there is problem,” Winkler said.

It certainly does.

The only way to fix this is through new legislation. Congress alone can change federal law to define a frame or receiver in such a way that AR-15 rifles are covered. That’s why Attorney General Lynch wrote the letter she did back in 2016, suggesting a legislative fix. But Congress apparently shrugged that off.

TTAG has reached out to Gregory Nicolaysen for comment on the case, but a call and a text haven’t been returned yet.

Under a legal principle called Chevron deference, federal courts give regulatory agencies like the ATF wide latitude in interpreting and enforcing Congress’s often poorly-written laws. However, when the agency’s interpretation is so clearly at odds with the underlying language of the law, even Ninth Circuit judges can’t overlook the problem.

(Nicolaysen) asked the judge to consider recommending that then-US Attorney General Jeff Sessions conduct a review to determine whether there were any similar cases pending around the country or past convictions “sustained on the basis of ATF policy, rather than law.”

The argument that Roh’s attorney employed to get his client a very good deal will no doubt be used by defendants in future prosecutions. It could also be used by other attorneys to try to reverse previous convictions of those found guilty on similar charges.

 

via The Truth About Guns
The ATF’s Definition of an AR-15 Lower as a ‘Firearm’ Is In Serious Trouble

Programming Languages 1965-2019

Programming Languages 1965-2019

Link

If you look back at how computers have been programmed over the years, the languages used have shuffled around quite a bit. From the early days of Fortran, to the rise of BASIC, to the explosion of Java, PHP, and Python, Data Is Beautiful charted the changing popularity of each major language over more than 50 years.

via The Awesomer
Programming Languages 1965-2019