Bet Your Life On Cheap FMJ? Armscor .223 Rem 62gr FMJ gel test

Buy it at Ventura Munitions: https://ift.tt/2NDKvM9 We shoot Armscor .223 Rem 62gr FMJ ammunition from a 10.5″ and 18″ AR15 into Clearballistics ballistic gel to measure velocity, penetration, expansion/fragmentation, and retained weight. If you aren’t already subscribed to us, you’re missing great content! Click here to subscribe. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnKbs5xffaEzzdKdPZvfhdQ?sub_confirmation=1 10.5″ Penetration: 15″ Retained weight: 51.4gr Neck: […]

Read More …

The post Bet Your Life On Cheap FMJ? Armscor .223 Rem 62gr FMJ gel test appeared first on The Firearm Blog.


via The Firearm Blog
Bet Your Life On Cheap FMJ? Armscor .223 Rem 62gr FMJ gel test

DOJ Reaches Settlement On Publication of Files About 3D Printed Firearms

He Who Has No Name writes: Those who remember Cody Wilson and Defense Distributed — the self-described cryptoanarchist and his organization that published plans for 3D printable firearm parts, respectively — also remember that not long after the plans for the printable Liberator single-shot pistol hit the web, the Department of State seized the Defense Distributed website and prohibited Wilson from publishing 3D printable firearm plans, claiming violations of ITAR — the International Traffic in Arms Regulation, a U.S. law taxing and restricting the distribution of a wide variety of physical goods listed as having military value. Slashdot covered the website seizure here (the Department of Defense was initially misreported in sources to have been the agency responsible). In both a First and Second Amendment win, the Second Amendment Foundation has settled with the Department of State after suing on behalf of Defense Distributed. Slashdot reader schwit1 shares an excerpt from the report: "Under terms of the settlement, the government has agreed to waive its prior restraint against the plaintiffs, allowing them to freely publish the 3-D files and other information at issue. The government has also agreed to pay a significant portion of the plaintiffs’ attorney’s fees, and to return $10,000 in State Department registration dues paid by Defense Distributed as a result of the prior restraint. Significantly, the government expressly acknowledges that non-automatic firearms up to .50-caliber — including modern semi-auto sporting rifles such as the popular AR-15 and similar firearms — are not inherently military."



Share on Google+

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

via Slashdot
DOJ Reaches Settlement On Publication of Files About 3D Printed Firearms

How to Take Care of Your Rifle

Firearms are wonderful things, and like all machines even the simplest rifle requires care and maintenance. Here are some pointers on how to take care of your rifle.

Keep Your Rifle Clean

A dirty rifle is more prone to corrosion and malfunction than a clean one, so it’s a good idea to keep that shootin’ iron nice and clean. This includes the bore, all moving parts, and even the exterior of the barrel, receiver, and stock.

Nooks and crannies can be cleaned with a toothbrush, if need be. Clean embedded crud out of checkering on the stock and any other areas of the gun’s exterior. It goes without saying to clean the bore and action to remove gunpowder residue and other fouling.

Clean gunk off using non-abrasive methods; mild solvent and a rag from an old t-shirt can work wonders, and won’t mess up your gun’s looks. Just make sure you don’t use any hard-core solvents that might damage plastic, wood finish, and/or painted metal parts.

Examine Your Rifle

It’s important to make sure your rifle works properly, so be sure to dig it out of storage from time to time to check it out. Old lubricants can turn to goo and gunk up the works, or maybe you forgot to clean it last time you used it. A few minutes of fondling and examination will show you its condition, so you’ll know it’s ready to go next time you need it.

Fire Your Rifle to Check Function and Zero (Aim)

You need to know your firearms will function whenever you need them — and hitting your target is pretty dang important, too. So fire your rifle to make sure it’s zeroed in and hitting where you aim, and to make sure everything works as it should. Does the bolt or lever move freely? On break-actions, does the latch hold it securely closed but allow easy, trouble-free opening? Do all safeties work properly (if present)? Do magazines fit properly, load and unload smoothly, and feed ammunition as they should? If the answer to any of those is “no,” you have a problem and should probably visit your local gunsmith.

Lubricate Moving Parts

Use high-quality oil or grease to lubricate all moving parts, per the manufacturer’s recommendations. Pivots, latches, catches, extractors, bolts, levers, the list goes on and on… just make sure you have lube where it ought to be and none where it shouldn’t. Your gun will thank you by always functioning well.

Protect Against Corrosion

Make sure all blued steel surfaces have a light coating of rust-preventative oil to prevent rust, and it doesn’t hurt to do the same to other metals/alloys as well. Corrosion is never a good thing for a firearm, and your rifle needs to be kept in good shape in order to remain dependable… and an undependable rifle isn’t much good to anyone.

Keep it Dry

Rifles were not meant to be used sopping wet. I’ve certainly done so while hunting, but the moisture is not good for them and your life will be happier if you dry your rifle thoroughly at the earliest opportunity. For hunters, this often means doing some work at the end of a long hunting day when you’d rather be eating supper, but it’s worth the work. Dry out your gun’s guts, lubricate it, wipe it down to prevent rust, and you’ll be glad you did.

Final Thoughts

Rifles are valuable tools and with some care, most rifles will far outlast the lives of their owners. Take care of your rifle and your rifle will take care of you.

The post How to Take Care of Your Rifle appeared first on AllOutdoor.com.

via All Outdoor
How to Take Care of Your Rifle

How Fracking Companies Use Facebook Surveillance To Ban Protest

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Motherboard:

Facebook is being used by oil and gas companies to clamp-down on protest. Three companies are currently seeking injunctions against protesters: British chemical giant INEOS, which has the largest number of shale gas drilling licenses in the UK; and small UK outfits UK Oil and Gas (UKOG), and Europa Oil and Gas. Among the thousands of pages of documents submitted to British courts by these companies are hundreds of Facebook and Twitter posts from anti-fracking protesters and campaign groups, uncovered by Motherboard in partnership with investigative journalists at DeSmog UK. They show how fracking companies are using social media surveillance carried out by a private firm to strengthen their cases in court by discrediting activists using personal information to justify banning their protests.

Included in the evidence supplied by the oil and gas companies to the courts are many personal or seemingly irrelevant campaigner posts. Some are from conversations on Facebook groups dedicated to particular protests or camps, while others have been captured from individuals’ own profile pages. For instance, a picture of a mother with her baby at a protest was submitted as part of the Europa Oil and Gas case. Another screenshot of a post in the Europa bundle shows a hand-written note from one of the protesters’ mothers accompanying a care package with hand-knitted socks that was sent to an anti-fracking camp. One post included in the UKOG hearing bundle shows two protesters sharing a pint in the sun — not at a protest camp, nor shared on any of the campaign pages’ Facebook groups. A screenshot from INEOS’s hearing bundle shows posts from a protester to his own Facebook wall regarding completely unrelated issues such as prescription drugs, and a generic moan about his manager.

via Slashdot
How Fracking Companies Use Facebook Surveillance To Ban Protest

Open Offices Make You Less Open

Why do companies deploy open office layouts? A major justification is the idea that removing spatial boundaries between colleagues will generate increased collaboration and smarter collective intelligence. Cal Newport:

As I learned in a fascinating new study, published earlier this week in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, there was good reason to believe that this might be true. As the study’s authors, Ethan Bernstein and Stephen Turban, note” [T]he notion that propinquity, or proximity, predicts social interaction — driving the formation of social ties and therefore information exchange and collaboration — is one of the most robust findings in sociology.”

But when researchers turned their attention to the specific impact of open offices on interaction, the results were mixed. Perhaps troubled by this inconsistency, Bernstein and Turban decided to get to the bottom of this issue. Prior studies of open offices had relied on imprecise measures such as self-reported activity logs to quantify interactions before and after a shift to an open office plan. Bernstein and Turban tried something more accurate: they had subjects wear devices around their neck that directly measured every face-to-face encounter. They also used email and IM server logs to determine exactly how much the volume of electronic interactions changed.

Here’s a summary of what they found: Contrary to what’s predicted by the sociological literature, the 52 participants studied spent 72% less time interacting face-to-face after the shift to an open office layout. To make these numbers concrete: In the 15 days before the office redesign, participants accumulated an average of around 5.8 hours of face-to-face interaction per person per day. After the switch to the open layout, the same participants dropped to around 1.7 hours of face-to-face interaction per day. At the same time, the shift to an open office significantly increased digital communication. After the redesign, participants sent 56% more emails (and were cc’d 41% more times), and the number of IM messages sent increased by 67%.

via Slashdot
Open Offices Make You Less Open

Thermacell Radius Mosquito Repellent

Thermacell Radius Mosquito Repellent

Price: $50  | Buy | Link

Protect yourself from those nasty bugs wherever you are with Thermacell’s Radius Zone Mosquito Repellent. It’s a rechargeable device that creates a 110sqft scent-free zone of protection against mosquitoes. It lasts up to 6h per charge, and each refill lasts up to 40h.

via The Awesomer
Thermacell Radius Mosquito Repellent

360º LEGO Train Factory Ride

360º LEGO Train Factory Ride

Link

BananenBuurman takes us on another fun ride on one of his LEGO railway constructions, this time taking a trip through his Grandpa’s factory, as tools, wood, and workbenches loom large. Want your own LEGO railway? Hit Trixbrix, and use code “crazybananen” for 10% off.

via The Awesomer
360º LEGO Train Factory Ride

5 Signs You Need to Start Removing Toxic People

They say you become just like the company you keep. Therefore, picking and choosing friends is one of life’s most underrated skills.

Friends make or break you. The right group of friends will help you get through life and succeed while the wrong ones will hold you down and potentially destroy you.

Moving through life, you’ll encounter countless people, many of whom you will call your “friend” at one point in life. Unfortunately, not every friend stays. In fact, the average length of a friendship is said to only be around seven years.

Most often, friends come and go but there are few who stick around for better or worse.

Not everyone who sticks is good for the relationship. Sometimes you must make the difficult choice of removing toxic people for your personal well-being.

Recognize these five signs to help you make this choice.

You Feel Drained Each Time You Hang Out

toxic friends

When you’ve been friends for a while, you’ve likely had your fair share of good and bad moments. Friends are there for you during bad times and vice versa. But this doesn’t excuse friends who always seem to suck the energy out of you every time.

Friends like these are toxic. They are usually negative, judgmental, and seem to be using you as a personal therapist to deal with their issues. This is extremely draining.

Cut these types of “friends” off before their negativity rubs off on you. Have some respect for yourself. You are not a personal punching bag.

See Also: 8 Types of Toxic Friends That Are Holding Your Happiness Hostage

You Can’t Compromise on Personal Values

It’s necessary to have friends from all walks of life because they offer you different views and help you grow. However, there are friends who you will never see eye-to-eye with.

Initially, it may not be a problem dealing with these friends but as you move further in life, your personal differences may just be too big to ignore.

Compromising on things like what to eat or what to watch is one thing. But when you are dealing with differences in life choices, you can’t afford to be with someone who contradicts you too often.

You’re the Only One Doing the Work

It takes two to tango. Otherwise, you’re just dancing with yourself. The same theory applies to friendship.

When you start realizing that you’re the only one making any effort to hang out or talk, that’s a red flag that your friend doesn’t value your friendship as much as you do.

Life happens and sometimes we become busy and burdened by responsibilities. True friends will try to spend time with you. If they can’t do that, then it’s best to move on.

You Can’t Be Yourself Around Them

It can take a while for people to become comfortable. When you met your friends for the first time, you probably felt wary at first but once you gained each other’s trust, it was smooth sailing.

But if there are still people you don’t feel comfortable with even after knowing for a while, you should move on.

You can’t develop good chemistry with everyone. And it’s not a true friendship if you can’t be yourself around them.

One of You Develops Unrequited Romantic Feelings

unrequited romantic feelings

This is the toughest friendship to end because neither of you did anything wrong unless you count “catching feelings” wrong. When you or your friend becomes hopelessly smitten but the other doesn’t reciprocate, it becomes an awkward situation.

This is painful because you are ending what was once a great friendship.

Holding on will only be more tragic. Save yourselves from future drama and quit while you’re ahead. Maybe, when feelings aren’t as hot anymore, you can rekindle your friendship.

Identifying which friends to keep is a tough process but keep in mind these key points. Chances are, you are already subconsciously doing it. Being more aware of your feelings towards your friends and relationships can help you refine the company you keep.

The post 5 Signs You Need to Start Removing Toxic People appeared first on Dumb Little Man.


via Dumb Little Man – Tips for Life
5 Signs You Need to Start Removing Toxic People

The Death Of Google Reader And The Rise Of Silos

I’ve been talking a lot lately about the unfortunate shift of the web from being more decentralized to being about a few giant silos and I expect to have plenty more to say on the topic in the near future. But I’m thinking about this again after Andy Baio reminded me that this past weekend was five years since Google turned off Google Reader. Though, as he notes, Google’s own awful decision making created the diminished use that allowed Google to justify shutting it down. Here’s Andy’s tweeted thread, and then I’ll tie it back to my thinking on the silo’d state of the web today:

Many people have pointed to the death of Google Reader as a point at which news reading online shifted from things like RSS feeds to proprietary platforms like Facebook and Twitter. It might seem odd (or ironic) to bemoan a move by one of the companies now considered one of the major silos for killing off a product, but it does seem to indicate a fundamental shift in the way that Google viewed the open web. A quick Google search (yeah, yeah, I know…) is not helping me find the quote, but I pretty clearly remember, in the early days of Google, one of Larry Page or Sergey Brin saying something to the effect of how the most important thing for Google was to get you off its site as quickly as possible. The whole point of Google was to take you somewhere else on the amazing web. Update It has been pointed out to me that the quote in question most likely is part of Larry Page’s interview with Playboy in which he responded to the fact that in the early days all of their competitors were "portals" that tried to keep you in with the following:

We built a business on the opposite message. We want you to come to Google and quickly find what you want. Then we’re happy to send you to the other sites. In fact, that’s the point. The portal strategy tries to own all of the information.

Somewhere along the way, that changed. It seems that much of the change was really an overreaction by Google leadership to the "threat" of Facebook. So many of Google’s efforts from the late 2000s until now seemed to have been designed to ward off Facebook. This includes not just Google’s multiple (often weird) attempts at building a social network, but also Google’s infatuation with getting users to sign in just to use its core search engine. Over the past decade or so, Google went very strongly from a company trying to get you off its site quickly to one that tried to keep you in. And it feels like the death of Reader was a clear indication of that shift. Reader started in the good old days, when the whole point of an RSS reader was to help you keep track of new stuff all over the web on individual sites.

But, as Andy noted above, part of what killed Reader was Google attempting desperately to use it as a tool to boost Google+, the exact opposite of what Google Reader stood for in helping people go elsewhere. I don’t think Google Reader alone would have kept RSS or the open web more thriving than it is today, but it certainly does feel like a landmark shift in the way Google itself viewed its mission: away from helping you get somewhere else, and much more towards keeping you connected to Google’s big data machine.

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story

via Techdirt
The Death Of Google Reader And The Rise Of Silos