Faraday Future Says It Has A Real Car Too But You Haven’t Seen It Yet

Faraday Future Says It Has A Real Car Too But You Haven't Seen It Yet

Last night, electric car startup Faraday Future served up the wild FFZERO1 concept as “the most extreme iteration of what it can build” with a barrage of buzzwords that left most people wondering what the hell was actually going on. But according to two company officials who spoke to Jalopnik, there is a real car out there testing on actual roads. We just haven’t seen it yet.

http://ift.tt/1IG5Bp2…

Those seeking real answers about Faraday Future after last night’s sometimes bizarre obfuscation-fest will be unsatisfied, however. At least for now.

For those who didn’t watch Faraday Future’s Las Vegas unveiling live, let’s recap. The startup, flush with cash from the billionaire behind China’s version of Netflix, would like you to know that they have an Amazing Team, a Transformative Vision, Incredible Alliances, and They Are Very Fast.

Also, they said, here is an amazing electric race car that we won’t build.

Faraday Future Says It Has A Real Car Too But You Haven't Seen It Yet

Journalists and casual observers alike found this frustrating. I was one of them. Faraday Future’s marketing message of being “a new kind of car company” that would “disrupt the industry” and “change everything we know about cars” rang more than a little hollow with little else to go on besides the undeniably radical looking concept before us.

Faraday Future Says It Has A Real Car Too But You Haven't Seen It Yet

Still, I was willing to reserve judgement until I got to sit down with Faraday Future’s chief designer Richard Kim and a communications representative this morning.

Kim’s not some geek off the streets when it comes to designing cars. He’s the man behind the BMW i3 and i8, two of the most fascinating and progressive approaches to new car building and green performance we’ve seen in years. His sidekick was a comms veteran of Jaguar Land Rover.

Here’s what I was able to glean from them about the company’s inner-workings, feasability, and (no pun intended) future.

Do you guys have a real car or what?

“It’s already through the feasibility shakedowns and test-driving out on roads,” Kim said. But it doesn’t look anything like the spaceworthy Batmobile we saw last night.

Faraday Future Says It Has A Real Car Too But You Haven't Seen It Yet

So why show us a ridiculous, unbuildable car?

Both balked at the word “unbuildable.”

“All the dimensions, suspension geometry, it’s all real,” Kim said. Apparently the FFZERO1, as insane as it looks, would actually be drivable if only it was connected to a powered platform.

But the answer to the question was simple: they wanted wow-factor.

The car was a passion project, something Kim and his design team were working on nights and weekends. It had them fired up. From a business perspective, Faraday Future figured it’d get the public fired up too. “Whet our appetite” for excitement to increase hype for the real deal, they said.

Will we see elements of this concept in your production car?

“Almost everything on the FFZERO1 has a connection to the production car,” Kim said, adding that the concept was “a distant cousin.”

Faraday Future Says It Has A Real Car Too But You Haven't Seen It Yet

Kim’s communications guy brought up the (very literal, in this case) smartphone integration in the steering wheel. “You get in a $100,000 Range Rover with your phone in your hand, then use the phone for navigation, and fumble for a place to put it,” he said. The company sees the FFZERO1’s steering wheel cellphone mount as a seamless solution to that problem, and it was hinted that such a feature might be in the road car.

But neither would get specific about the “realistic” feasibility of light strings, air tunnels, yoke-style steering thing or jet-fighter cockpit: any of the other outlandish things we saw on the prototype last night.

When will we be able to drive, or ride in, one of your vehicles?

Faraday Future’s chief engineer has been as specific as “a couple years” on this one. Kim basically told me it’ll happen when the car is good and ready.

In stark contrast to Faraday Future’s party line of “We Are Very Fast,” company officials seemed wary of going to market too soon. “The consumer wants quality, performance, price, it take time to satisfy all these demands,” Kim said.

What price range are you shooting for?

No comment whatsoever on this one.

The FFZERO1 looks like a million dollar hypercar, but if Faraday Future wants to “remix the auto industry,” it’s going to have to build something people can actually afford to use.

Who are your competitors?

The answer here from Kim was a nebulous (and very Silicon Valley) “we don’t see ourselves as a car company.” So no automakers, but also all of them, would be competitors for the consumer’s dollar. As for a price or performance segment in which to benchmark it, we’re just going to have to wait.

What are the biggest challenges you’re still working through?

“Everything,” they said. Not surprising when you’re a startup.

Faraday Future Says It Has A Real Car Too But You Haven't Seen It Yet

The gentlemen from Faraday Future were not interested in discussing specifics on how they’re planning on selling or servicing their cars, let alone getting them road legal for consumer purchase. But that didn’t stop me from pressing.

How are you planning on selling, servicing, maintaining your products? Getting them government-certified?

The answer sounded like an honest “we don’t know” from Kim and has communications guy.

That’s the scary part. Designing an extreme, aesthetically challenging concept is one thing; making it functional is another, getting it to pass federal and state safety and environmental standards is yet another.

The idea of a dealer network was obviously unformed as well. Whether Faraday Future is even planning on selling cars in some semblance of a “traditional” model or wants to go a completely different route is also yet to be determined. We know they’re big on autonomy, so that will have a big impact on the idea of ownership and mobility.

But the Nevada factory’s going up in a couple weeks.

In case you didn’t know, Faraday Future in December secured $335 million in state incentives from Nevada to build what it says will be a $1 billion manufacturing plant. And the company says groundbreaking is set to begin this month. Is this for real, I asked?

There was no doubt on the face of either Kim or his accomplice about the company’s commitment to building their megalithic assembly facility in North Las Vegas. By the end of January, Faraday Future will be building their plant, they insisted.

Both Kim and his fellow representative have worked at large traditional automakers, so I asked: Why don’t shops like BMW and Jaguar Land Rover pull stunts like Faraday?

“I can’t speak to their business plans,” Kim said, “but companies like that are big machines, and things move slowly.” Remember how this one is supposed to be faster?

Faraday Future says they’re building cars without clay models, going straight from digital rendering to tangible parts. This speeds along the production process.

Does that mean it allows for more mistakes? I guess we’ll see how the first batch of Faraday Futuremobiles come out. Or we won’t.

Does Faraday Future still have something interesting up its sleeve, or will it just go up in a smoldering pile of defaced dollar bills?

This, of course, is the only question you’ve got and probably the reason you’re reading this. The answer is still disappointingly insipid because it’s the only thing Faraday Future is really willing to support their claims with: “Trust us.”

We were told Faraday Future will disrupt, then we sat though a presentation I would have expected from any high-end automaker down to the well-dressed woman posing with the product. We were told that crazy concept would work if made real; “Just look at the suspension and frame!”, they said, but who can tell a properly-positioned shock absorber from a prop?

Finally, I felt myself holding back a chuckle when I heard that Faraday Future will “Think Different.” Both Kim and his assistant seem like intelligent people with earnest confidence in their product, not to mention good resumes; the rest of the company’s personnel lineup seems much the same.

But with so many significant questions still unanswered about this Great Disruptor, it was hard for me not to feel like I was less in a presentation by a major automotive force to be reckoned with and more in an episode of Silicon Valley.

I’m looking forward to seeing what Faraday Future has in store, but I’m still deeply skeptical. And I know I’m not the only one.

Faraday Future Says It Has A Real Car Too But You Haven't Seen It Yet


Contact the author at andrew@jalopnik.com.

via Gizmodo
Faraday Future Says It Has A Real Car Too But You Haven’t Seen It Yet

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Adhesive Tape

szczys writes: You take tape for granted, but it’s truly an engineering wonder. For instance, Scotch Magic tape exhibits triboluminescence; it will generate a bit of bluish light when coming off the roll in a darkened room. It emits X-Rays if unrolled in a vacuum. But this common tape is just the tip of the iceberg. Nava Whiteford looks at lab uses of many different types of tape. Kapton tape is thermally stable and non-conductive. Carbon tape is conductive but resistive. That moves into the non-resistive and more niche tape types. There’s a tape for every function. This instant and non-messy way to connect two things together has a lot of science behind it, as well as ahead of it in experimentation, manufacturing, and of course household use.

Share on Google+

Read more of this story at Slashdot.



via Slashdot
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Adhesive Tape

Israel Discovers the Value of Armed Self-Defense. Again.

Moshe Nussbaum (courtesy theblaze.com)

John Farnham writes [via Ammoland.com]

“Given that some attacks have been stopped by gun-carrying civilians, Israeli Public Security Minister, Gilad Erdan, in October eased citizens’ access to guns, calling gun-owners a ‘force multiplier’ in combating nearly daily Palestinian stabbing … Read More

The post Israel Discovers the Value of Armed Self-Defense. Again. appeared first on The Truth About Guns.

via The Truth About Guns
Israel Discovers the Value of Armed Self-Defense. Again.

Here’s the Fastest Way to Defrost Your Car Windshield According to Science

Here's the Fastest Way to Defrost Your Car Windshield According to Science

It’s winter. If you drive a car that’s parked outside, you know what that means. It’s frigid as hell inside your car and the windshield is totally opaque from all the foggy ass frost. Not cool. How do you get rid of it? Hit the defrost button right? That’s not all. The always inquisitive Mark Rober tested out every combination on how to defrost your windshield and came up with a way that is twice as fast as other methods. That means you’ll get a clear windshield in half the time.

Watch the video below to see Rober explain what he is trying to achieve and how he conducts his experiments (it’s really fascinating) and the results are truly impressive but the nut of it is rather simple:

  1. Turn heater on at full blast
  2. Turn AC on
  3. Turn off the inside air circulation
  4. Crack open the windows

Turning on the windshield defroster is obvious, right? But definitely check out the video because Rober has some tips that would speed up the defogging process even more.


SPLOID is delicious brain candy. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.

via Gizmodo
Here’s the Fastest Way to Defrost Your Car Windshield According to Science

LastPass Revamps Its Interface, Adds Emergency Access and Better Sharing

LastPass is one of the best password managers around. Today it gets a bit better with an improved interface and a handful of new features.

http://ift.tt/1Mijuoy…

The new interface makes LastPass much easier to use, concentrating on bigger icons, simpler navigation, and brighter colors. The password vault now has big icons that include a site’s logo, you can now swap between a grid and list view, and the “Add” menu has been simplified to easy save new info. You can also now bulk select items to quickly make a bunch of changes at once. Plus, in case you hate the new interface, you can toggle back to the old one with the click of a button.

Also new is an Emergency Access feature where you can designate trusted people to gain access to you vault in case of an emergency. When someone does attempt to access your account, you’ll have the chance to deny them in case if you’re able. As for shared passwords, the new Sharing Center allows you to easily share passwords over an encrypted network so you don’t have to rely on texts or emails. All the new features are rolling out to the web and mobile apps today.

LastPass 4 | LastPass


via Lifehacker
LastPass Revamps Its Interface, Adds Emergency Access and Better Sharing

The Best and Worst Projects for Increasing Your Home’s Return on Investment

If you’re a homeowner, you’re probably always thinking of ways you can increase your home’s resale value. Here are the best additions you can make to your home if you want to increase your return on investment.

This handy visual guide from Northshore Fireplace lists the top five highest return on investment renovation projects, as well as additional helpful information for each type of project. For example, replacing your main entry door with a new steel door is a fairly easy way to up the perceived value of your home. Other projects that can help your return on investment include installing a new fireplace, replacing the siding on your house, remodeling your kitchen, and turning your attic into a bedroom. Some projects are best avoided, however, like adding a sunroom or a fancy garage. You can check out the guide in its entirety down below.

http://ift.tt/1D4ei6g…

Get the Best Return on Investment with Your Next Home Improvement Project | Northshore Fireplace

The Best and Worst Projects for Increasing Your Home's Return on Investment


via Lifehacker
The Best and Worst Projects for Increasing Your Home’s Return on Investment

Omron Squeezed an Inflatable Blood Pressure Monitor Into a Watch

Omron Squeezed an Inflatable Blood Pressure Monitor Into a Watch

Almost every wrist-worn fitness tracker now includes a sensor that can track the wearer’s heart rate as another useful fitness metric. But Omron is the first company with a wearable device that can also monitor blood pressure which provides more useful insights into the wearer’s health.

That’s not to imply that you shouldn’t seek medical attention when your heart rate soars after simply struggling to open a fridge door, but there’s a good reason why hospitals strap the inflatable cuff of a sphygmomanometer to your arm as soon as you’ve been admitted.

Measuring your blood pressure can reveal serious conditions like hypertension or hypotension, but until now the most accurate way to get a reading was using a large inflatable cuff wrapped around a patient’s upper arm. Measuring blood pressure at the wrist is an option, but the Omron Project Zero Wrist Blood Pressure Monitor is the first watch-sized sphygmomanometer that promises readings as accurate as what you’d get from upper arm models.

Pricing and availability for the Project Zero is still undetermined as Omron works to complete certification and FDA-testing on the device, but the company claims it will be accurate enough to be certified for use in hospitals and medical facilities.

Because Omron uses a miniaturized version of the inflatable cuff found on larger blood pressure monitors, the Project Zero isn’t quite as svelte as a wearable like the Apple Watch, but it can still be worn day and night as a fitness tracker if you don’t mind a little extra bulk on your wrist.

Omron Squeezed an Inflatable Blood Pressure Monitor Into a Watch

In addition to measuring blood pressure, Omron’s over-sized wearable also tracks other fitness metrics like physical activity, or even the quality of your sleep over night. And all of that information can be wirelessly synced with the Omron Connect app, available for iOS or Android devices, allowing users to keep tabs on their health progress over time, or to send health reports to a physician for remote monitoring of a condition.

Most fitness enthusiasts probably don’t need to keep tabs on their blood pressure on a minute-by-minute basis, and there’s little doubt the Project Zero Wrist Blood Pressure Monitor will eventually hit the market at a price point higher than most fitness trackers. But compared to the blood pressure monitors that hospitals have to wheel from room to room and patient to patient, the Project Zero will also certainly be a cheaper and more convenient solution for keeping tabs on a patient’s blood pressure. In other words, there will be no shortage of interested buyers for this one.

[Omron]

via Gizmodo
Omron Squeezed an Inflatable Blood Pressure Monitor Into a Watch

Run Windows on Your Mac: VirtualBox vs VMware Fusion vs Parallels

Run Windows on Your Mac: VirtualBox vs VMware Fusion vs Parallels

If you need to run Windows inside OS X, you have three options: VirtualBox, VMware, and Parallels. Each has their own strengths and weaknesses, and different use cases where one’s better than another. Let’s break down when each is best and for what.

The Contenders

Virtual machines allow you to run operating systems like Windows inside of OS X, alongside your normal Mac setup. Once you set up a virtual machine, you install the operating system you want and you can use it right from your Mac desktop, no rebooting necessary. There are three popular options for doing this:

  • VirtualBox (Free): VirtualBox is easily the nerdiest of the three options we’re comparing here. It’s packed with all sorts of customization options for your virtual machines, but doesn’t have any fancy integration features like Parallels and VMware. Essentially, VirtualBox allows you to create a virtual machine that’ll run Windows, and that’s about it.
  • VMware Fusion ($79.99 for unlimited Macs): VMware Fusion walks the line between Parallels and VirtualBox, offering up a ton of options for tweaking your virtual machine, but still providing plenty of hand-holding for the initial setup process.
  • Parallels ($79.99 for one Mac): VMware Fusion and Parallels are very similar, but Parallels guides you through the installation process more closely. It also focuses on home users, who simply need an easy way to use Windows on their Mac without rebooting or getting another computer.

We’d be remiss here not to also mention Boot Camp, which runs Windows on a separate partition of your hard drive. Unlike virtual machines, Boot Camp requires rebooting your computer, and you can’t use both operating systems at the same time. It’s a bit less convenient, but it means your Windows installation can take full advantage of your Mac’s hardware, giving you better performance. We won’t be including it in today’s showdown—which is specifically about the different virtualization options out there—but it’s worth mentioning as an option for running Windows on a Mac.

Now let’s dig into some of the specifics of each.

http://ift.tt/1O3Iwcw…

Ease of Setup

Run Windows on Your Mac: VirtualBox vs VMware Fusion vs Parallels

Virtual machines aren’t like other apps. Setup goes beyond just installing the app, so the ease of the process is pretty important.

Let’s start with VirtualBox, since it’s the most hands-on of the bunch. You start by creating a virtual machine and selecting the operating system you plan to run (Windows, Linux, etc). From there, you’ll need to tweak a bunch of system settings, including how many processor cores the virtual machine gets, how much memory and video memory it gets from the total installed in your system. Thankfully, we have a guide to help you through the whole process. Once you have all of that configured, you’ll install the operating system just like you would on any computer. That means you’ll need an installation disc, USB drive, or ISO file to install from.

Both VMware and Parallels have setup wizards that guide you through the process a little more. Beyond simply installing a virtual machine, both allow you to import your Boot Camp partition if you have one, or migrate an old Windows PC to your Mac. Parallels (pictured above) guides you through the installation process a lot more, and you’ll get the option to automatically optimize Parallels for productivity or gaming. Of course, you always can move past that screen and install Windows from scratch if you prefer.

They’re all simple, though Parallels has a bit of an advantage for new users since it holds your hand throughout the process. In terms of user friendliness, Parallels was consistently the strongest of the three we tested. That makes it a great solution for anyone not interested in screwing around with settings.

http://ift.tt/22FudVh…

Additional Features That Make All the Difference

Run Windows on Your Mac: VirtualBox vs VMware Fusion vs Parallels

While each of these three programs do fundamentally the same thing, a handful of small features set them apart from one another.

All three apps feature some type of windowed mode support (see image above). This allows you to run a single Windows application in its own window on your Mac desktop, so it feels a little more like a native Mac app. VMware calls this Unity, Parallels calls this Coherence, and VirtualBox calls it Seamless Mode. When an app is in windowed mode, you can copy and paste information between Windows and Mac apps, move and resize them, and close an app without shutting down Windows.

Parallels and VMware both allow you to open up individual Windows programs directly from the Dock, which makes the whole process very easy. VirtualBox doesn’t support this feature, instead requiring you to open up the whole virtual machine to pick our your app of choice.

The similarities don’t stop there. If you’re running Windows 10, Parallels and VMware both give you access to Cortana to issue voice commands, even if Windows isn’t in focus. They also both support DirectX 10, which means they can run most games, though good performance isn’t guaranteed (more on that in the next section). VirtualBox doesn’t support any cool little tricks like this. Instead, it merely performs the simple task of running Windows as a whole.

The feature differences between the Parallels and VMware are pretty subtle. For example, Parallels supports OS X’s Quick Look feature in Windows, while VMware doesn’t. Conversely, if you happen to have a fancy new iMac, VMware supports 5K monitors natively. Most of this stuff is pretty minor though, and honestly if you stripped away the logos, I’d have a hard time telling a difference between the two.

If you want a full comparison of everything in VMware Fusion and Parallels, Wikipedia has a handy chart that’s worth a look, though it’s not completely up-to-date.

http://ift.tt/1frgqOb…

Performance and Benchmarks

Since virtual machines have to share resources with the host OS, performance is very important. Thankfully, TekRevue has benchmarked all three programs for a variety of tasks. The current version of VMware outperforms the others in nearly every category, while VirtualBox is way behind its competitors. Of course, there’s more to it than just that.

In 18 different tests, VMware took top honors in 11, most notably in the graphics benchmarks. Performance margins were typically pretty close and as a whole, Parallels tends to do best in CPU-related tests where VMware does best in graphics-related tests.

The general trend of CPU versus graphics runs throughout their tests. Parallels tends to boot faster than VMware, transfer files faster, and saves battery life better than VMware. In turn, VMware benchmarks much higher for 3D graphics and for gaming, especially with OpenGL. VirtualBox consistently lags behind in both CPU and 3D performance.

The Verdict: VirtualBox for a Free, Bare-Bones Experience. VMware or Parallels for an Easy-to-Use, More Integrated One

Run Windows on Your Mac: VirtualBox vs VMware Fusion vs Parallels

If you just need Windows to run that one old app that doesn’t require a ton of 3D rendering or other complicated processing, VirtualBox is what you want. Beyond that, feature-wise, the two paid options are very similar, and the difference is mainly price and how many Macs you need to install on. If you’re planning on running anything in 3D or want to install Windows on more than one Mac, then go with VMware. If you’re more interested in productivity software and battery life, and don’t mind the one Mac restriction, then Parallels is your best bet.

All of this changes from year to year, too. Parallels and VMware both require that you buy an annual license every year to get updates that pack in performance gains and feature improvements. These annual updates are great in theory, but they’re not cheap, and they come every year without fail. This is a bit tiresome, especially when they lock out newer versions of Windows behind those paid upgrades. Provided you don’t need to be on the cutting edge, they’re usually pretty incremental, though, and you’re okay skipping one or two—as long as a new version of Windows doesn’t come out.

Regardless, the good news here is that while VirtualBox is free, even VMware Fusion and Parallels have trial periods so you can check them all out. We definitely recommend doing so before you drop the cash. You don’t have to try out all three options, but if your needs are pretty limited, start with VirtualBox before considering VMware or Parallels.


via Lifehacker
Run Windows on Your Mac: VirtualBox vs VMware Fusion vs Parallels

New Archangel 10/22 Stocks

purple archangelArchangel Manufacturing will introduce a number of new 10/22 stocks at the 2016 SHOT Show. These new stocks are variants on the company’s existing 10/22 stock: the AAP1022 that was introduced at the 2015 SHOT Show. The new stocks are functionally the same as the existing black stock, but are now available in new colors. […]

Read More …

The post New Archangel 10/22 Stocks appeared first on The Firearm Blog.


via The Firearm Blog
New Archangel 10/22 Stocks

Force Refresh the iOS App Store by Tapping the Tab Bar 10 Times

Force Refresh the iOS App Store by Tapping the Tab Bar 10 Times

Every once in a while, the App Store seems to glitch out and get stuck either not properly updating or not showing new updates correctly. Over on Twitter, Zachary Drayer points out that you can force reload everything in the app by tapping an icon on the tab bar 10 times.

All you need to do is tap any of the five menu items at the bottom of the App Store screen 10 times in a row (you’ll need to tap the same one 10 times). When you do that, you’ll see the screen briefly go blank and reload everything. If updates aren’t properly showing or if something’s stuck, it’s a good way to try and get things moving again.

Zachary Drayer | Twitter via AppAdvice


via Lifehacker
Force Refresh the iOS App Store by Tapping the Tab Bar 10 Times