iPhone 15 Pro Max versus iPhone 12 Pro Max — Specs and features, compared

https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/56413-114570-ippm15v12-xl.jpg

iPhone 15 Pro Max vs iPhone 12 Pro Max –


Most iPhone owners don’t upgrade every year. If history is any indication, there will be a lot of iPhone 12 Pro Max owners looking to upgrade to the iPhone 15 Pro Max. Here’s what has changed to the top model in three years.

The amount of time an iPhone owner waits between upgrades is lengthening, with surveys pointing to a three-year wait between purchases. That’s up from the previous typical upgrade cycle of every two years.

Under a three-year cycle, that would mean owners of the iPhone 12 collection will be seeking out replacement devices. For the iPhone 12 Pro Max, the obvious upgrade is to the modern-day equivalent, the iPhone 15 Pro Max.

A lot of change can happen over three years. Here’s what those iPhone 12 Pro Max owners will discover when they compare their daily driver against Apple’s top-of-the-range option.

iPhone 15 Pro Max vs iPhone 12 Pro Max – Specifications

Specifications iPhone 12 Pro Max iPhone 15 Pro Max
Dimensions (inches) 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.32
Weight (ounces) 8.03 7.81
Processor A14 Bionic A17 Pro
Storage 128GB, 256GB, 512GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB
Display type 6.7-inch Super Retina XDR,
ProMotion
6.7-inch Super Retina XDR,
ProMotion, always-on display
Resolution 2,778 x 1,284 at 458ppi 2,796 x 1,290 at 460 ppi
True Tone Yes Yes
Biometrics Face ID Face ID
Connectivity 5G (Sub-6GHz and mmWave)
Gigabit-class LTE
Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth 5.0
Ultra Wideband
NFC
Lightning
5G (Sub-6GHz and mmWave)
Gigabit-class LTE
Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth 5.3
Ultra Wideband Gen 2
NFC
Emergency SOS via Satellite
Roadside Assistance via Satellite
USB-C
Rear Cameras 12MP Wide
12MP Ultra Wide
12MP Telephoto with 2.5x optical zoom
48MP Wide
12MP Ultra Wide
12MP Telephoto with 5x optical zoom
Video 4K 60fps,
4K 60fps HDR with Dolby Vision,
1080p 240fps Slo-Mo
4K 60fps,
4K 60fps HDR with Dolby Vision,
1080p 240fps Slo-Mo
ProRes 4K 60fps with external recording,
Cinematic Mode,
Action Mode
Front Camera 12MP TrueDepth with Autofocus 12MP TrueDepth with Autofocus
Battery Size (Video playback time) Up to 20 hours Up to 29 hours
Colors Pacific Blue,
Gold,
Graphite,
Silver
Black Titanium,
White Titanium,
Blue Titanium,
Natural Titanium

iPhone 15 Pro Max vs iPhone 12 Pro Max – Physical Dimensions

The first thing that should strike the iPhone 12 Pro Max owner is that there’s not really that much difference in the physical nature of the two devices. They are similarly styled, with a glass sandwich around a central metal chassis, and a glass camera bump with the lenses all in the same place.

But even here, there are subtle changes.

For a start, the materials used to make the smartphones has changed, with the 12 using a Stainless Steel chassis while the 15 has a Titanium version. There’s also the side Ring/Silent switch on the iPhone 12 Pro Max, which has been switched out for the multi-functional Action Button for the iPhone 15 Pro Max.

At the bottom, the Lightning port from the 12 has been switched out for the 15’s USB-C.

Looking at the dimensions, the iPhone 12 Pro Max has a larger footprint than the iPhone 15 Pro Max, at 6.33 inches tall by 3.07 inches wide versus 6.29 inches by 3.02 inches. Apple did say that it had worked on shrinking the chassis of the iPhone 15 Pro Max without cutting the screen size down.

The thickness is also on the iPhone 12 Pro Max’s side, with it being a svelte 0.29 inches thin, against the latest model’s 0.32-inch thickness.

The Titanium comes into play with weight, with the older model at 8.03 ounces to the modern 7.81 ounces.

These are all small externally-visible changes, but it’s the components that count more.

iPhone 15 Pro Max vs iPhone 12 Pro Max – Displays

Apple hasn’t changed the physical size of the 6.7-inch Super Retina XDR display over the years, but it has made some changes to the component.

Firstly, there’s a tiny bit more resolution on the latest edition, at 2,796 by 1,290 pixels versus 2,778 by 1,284 pixels on the iPhone 12 Pro Max. That’s a change from a pixel density of 458 pixels per inch to 460ppi.

iPhone 15 Pro Max vs iPhone 12 Pro Max – notch versus Dynamic Island

Another missing feature on the older model is the Dynamic Island, Apple’s answer to the ever-complained-about notch that sits at the top of the three-year-old smartphone. That’s before you bring in ProMotion, which Apple introduced in the iPhone 13 Pro models, and continues to use in its latest Pro releases.

The iPhone 15 Pro Max is also equipped with an always-on display, which the iPhone 12 Pro Max simply doesn’t have.

Other elements continue to be present in both models, such as HDR support, Wide Color (P3), Haptic Touch, True Tone, and a 2 million to one contrast ratio.

Then there’s brightness. The iPhone 12 Pro manages 800 nits of typical brightness, and 1,200 nits for peak brightness for HDR content.

These are high figures, but the iPhone 15 Pro Max now handles 1,000 nits of max brightness for typical usage and 1,600 nits of peak HDR brightness. It even goes up to 2,000 nits of peak brightness for outdoor usage.

Suffice it to say, Apple did a lot with the display while still keeping it looking similar to its older counterpart.

iPhone 15 Pro Max vs iPhone 12 Pro Max – Cameras

The camera arrangement hasn’t changed for the Pro Max line in three years. But the cameras certainly have.

The iPhone 12 Pro Max has three LiDAR-assisted 12-megapixel cameras, with an f/1.6 aperture Main, f/2.4 aperture Ultra Wide, and an f/2.2 aperture Telephoto. It also used Sensor-Shift optical image stabilization.

The iPhone 15 Pro Max still uses three cameras and LiDAR, but the Main is now a 48-megapixel shooter with an f/1.78 aperture, the Ultra Wide is 12MP with an f/2.2 aperture, and the Telephoto is a 12MP camera with an f/2.8 aperture. Sensor-Shift has also been moved to the second generation.

The Main camera’s massive resolution does allow for higher-resolution shots to be taken, but also for a virtual fourth camera sensor range to be used. By cropping to the sensor’s center, Apple creates another 12MP camera that offers an “optical zoom” midway between the Main and Telephoto options.

That Telephoto on the iPhone 15 Pro Max has an extra trick in the form of a tetraprism lens. The system reflects light and increases the distance it must travel through the lenses, allowing Apple to push the optical zoom level further.

In effect, the iPhone 12 Pro Max has optical zooms of 0.5x (Ultra Wide), 1x (Main), and 2.5x (Telephoto). The iPhone 15 Pro Max offers 0.5x (Ultra Wide), 1x (Main), 2x (Cropped Main), and 5x (Telephoto).

iPhone 15 Pro Max vs iPhone 12 Pro Max – camera bumps

Computational photography continues to be alive and well, with Deep Fusion on the 12 accompanied by the Photonic Engine on the 15. Both offer Portrait Mode with Depth Control, Portrait Lighting, Night Mode, and Apple ProRAW, but the newer model also deals with Photographic Styles and macro photography.

On to video, and both can do 4K video at 60fps, including HDR recording with Dolby Vision, and 1080p 240fps Slo-Mo, among other features. The iPhone 15 goes further in offering the 4K HDR 30fps Cinematic Mode, Action Mode, ProRes video at 4K 60fps with external recording, Log video recording, Academy Color Encoding System support and macro video.

The TrueDepth camera hasn’t changed that much over the years, with Apple still using a 12MP sensor, albeit with an f/1.9 aperture in the newer model against f/2.2 in the older one. Deep Fusion is used by both, though there’s the Photonic Engine on the 15.

iPhone 15 Pro Max vs iPhone 12 Pro Max – Processing Performance

There’s been three years of chip updates in the Pro line, with the 12 using the A14 Bionic and the 14 equipped with the latest A17 Pro.

Both chips use the time-tested arrangement of two high-performance cores and four efficiency cores for the CPU. The GPU switches from a 4-core version in the 12 to a 6-core GPU with hardware-acclerated ray tracing and a dedicated AV1 decoder for streaming video.

The Neural Engine is still a 16-core component, but the newest edition in the A17 Pro can handle almost 17 trillion operations per second. That’s against 11 trillion operations per second for the A14 Bionic.

We know that there is a three-generation jump to consider, which isn’t easy to spell out considering that no-one’s been able to use the A17 Pro in the real world yet, but it’s going to be pretty obvious that there will be a bit of a difference.

According to Geekbench, the iPhone 12 Pro scores 2,048 for its single-core test and 4,667 for the multi-core result. For Metal, it manages a respectable 16,009.

The nearest equivalent we can look at for the moment would be the A16 Bionic, the A17 Pro’s predecessor. It scores 2,521 for the single-core, 6,376 for the multi-core, and 22,287 for the Metal score.

There is an obvious difference between the chips, but consider that the A17 Pro should be faster than the A16. Apple says the CPU should be 10 percent faster, the GPU should see a 20-percent gain, and the Neural Engine should be twice as fast as the A16’s version.

iPhone 15 Pro Max vs iPhone 12 Pro Max – Connectivity

There’s not really been any change on the cellular connectivity side of things, with Apple supporting sub-6Ghz and mmWAVE in both of its models, as well as Gigabit LTE.

On local wireless connectivity, Apple has moved from Wi-Fi 6 to Wi-Fi 6E in three years, with Bluetooth 5.0 switched out for Bluetooth 5.3. Unless you happen to have hardware that uses these technologies, you’re not really going to see much difference in everyday life.

Ultra Wideband is present in both, but the iPhone 15 Pro Max uses a second-generation chip, enabling for range and directional information about other iPhone 15 handsets with the same chip when searching in Find My. There’s also Thread support in the iPhone 15 Pro Max, which is missing in the iPhone 12 Pro Max.

NFC is present in both cases, enabling Apple Pay to function.

If it wasn’t for Lightning, many would think this iPhone 12 Pro Max was the iPhone 15 version at first glance.

Turning to extended range communications, and the iPhone 15 Pro Max is capable of communicating with satellites, with both Emergency SOS via satellite and Roadside Assistance via Satellite functional on the model. There’s no satellite communications for the iPhone 12 Pro Max.

The physical connectivity has changed significantly, with Lightning in the iPhone 12 Pro Max switched out for USB-C. This change does mean there are more power connections open to iPhone 15 Pro Max users, who can even use chargers for many Android devices that already use the connection.

There’s also the bonus of data transfers, as Lightning is limited to USB 2.0 speeds, namely 480Mbps. The USB-C in the iPhone 15 Pro models can transfer at up to 10Gbps, and if you’re using the camera, you can record video directly to an external drive.

iPhone 15 Pro Max vs iPhone 12 Pro Max – Power and Battery

As time marched on, battery technology and internal hardware designs have improved to allow Apple to include higher capacities in its devices. That, coupled with Apple’s work to improve efficiency tends to result in hardware slowly getting more battery life over time.

This also holds true for the iPhone 12 Pro Max and iPhone 15 Pro Max.

According to Apple, the iPhone 12 Pro Max has a 20-hour battery life for watching locally-stored video, or up to 12 hours for streamed video, and up to 80 hours of audio playback.

The iPhone 15 Pro Max soundly beats those figures, with 29 hours for local video playback, 25 hours for streamed video, and up to 95 hours for audio.

Getting power into the iPhones hasn’t changed much, with MagSafe and Qi support as well as wired charging, albeit with differing connectors.

To get to a 50% charge, Apple says it can take about 30 minutes using a 20W or higher power adapter for both models.

iPhone 15 Pro Max vs iPhone 12 Pro Max – Other Features

Apple maintains an IP68 rating for both models, meaning they can survive a water depth of up to 6 meters (19.7 feet) for 30 minutes.

The iPhone 15 Pro Max is the only one of the two to have Crash Detection, a feature where the iPhone’s sensors are used to determine if the user has been in a car accident. If detected, the iPhone will attempt to get assistance, unless the user stops it.

One advantage for the iPhone 12 Pro Max is that it supports dual SIMs, specifically one physical nano-SIM and one eSIM. Apple does offer the iPhone 15 Pro Max with the same nano-SIM and eSIM combo in many territories, but in some, it’s only allowing dual eSIMs and doesn’t offer physical sim support at all.

iPhone 15 Pro Max vs iPhone 12 Pro Max – Capacity, Color, and Pricing

At the time of release, the iPhone 12 Pro Max starting from $1,099, with a choice of three capacities: 128GB, 256GB, and 512GB. It can be found on Apple’s Certified Refurbished page, starting from $679.

iPhone 15 Pro Max vs iPhone 12 Pro Max – color selections

The iPhone 15 Pro Max starts at $1,199 for a 256GB capacity, the same cost as the 256GB capacity iPhone 12 Pro Max at launch. The 15 is also available in 512GB and 1TB capacities, priced at $1,399 and $1,599 respectively.

Apple sold the iPhone 12 Pro Max in a choice of four colors: Graphite, Silver, Gold, and Pacific Blue. Likewise, the iPhone 15 Pro Max is available in four colors: Natural Titanium, Blue Titanium, Black Titanium, and White Titanium.

iPhone 15 Pro Max vs iPhone 12 Pro Max – Worth the Upgrade?

It’s fair to say that there has been a lot of change in just three years for the top of Apple’s iPhone product range.

In that time, the iPhone 15 Pro Max has seen its processing performance grow significantly, the cameras improve in resolution and in zoom capability, the video features blossom into something videographers and other creatives can get their teeth into, and with highly extended battery life.

All this, while also keeping the basic styling of the Pro Max model fairly static over time. With small exceptions such as the Action button and Lightning changed to USB-C, there’s little visible change at all.

Under the hood, where it matters, is where the big alterations have taken place.

Owners of the iPhone 12 Pro Max will naturally want to see big changes in their next smartphone, and while the iPhone 15 Pro Max is a very familiar package, it certainly offers a lot to potential upgraders.

Where to buy the iPhone 15 Pro Max

The iPhone 15 Pro Max is available to order, with profoundly long delays already. Shipments start on September 22.

AppleInsider News

Clorox Products In Short Supply After Cyberattack

An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNN: A cyberattack at Clorox is causing wide-scale disruption of the company’s operations, hampering its ability to make its cleaning materials, Clorox said Monday. Clorox said some of its products are now in short supply as it has struggled to meet consumer demand during the disruption. Clorox didn’t specify which of its products are affected. The company on Monday revealed in a regulatory filing that it detected unauthorized activity in some of its information technology systems in August. Clorox said it immediately took action to stop the attack, including reducing its operations. It now believes the attack has been contained. Still, Clorox has not been able to get its manufacturing operations back up to full speed. The company said it is fulfilling and processing orders manually. The company doesn’t expect to begin the process of returning to normal operations until next week. "Clorox has already resumed production at the vast majority of its manufacturing sites and expects the ramp up to full production to occur over time," the company said. "At this time, the company cannot estimate how long it will take to resume fully normalized operations." The company said the cyberattack and the delays will hurt its current-quarter financial results materially, although Clorox said determining any longer-term impact would be premature, "given the ongoing recovery."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Slashdot

Portable security

http://img.youtube.com/vi/fVIOIi8YziA/0.jpg

This video hit my feed this morning.

 

Yes, we can all mock Leftist and say, “you voted for this.”

But…

What about the people who didn’t vote for this?  Should they suffer?

I am traveling at the end of this month that will have me spend two days in Portland, Oregon.

Most of one of those days will be after I check out of my hotel, so my belongings will have to stay in my rental car.

I have already posted about the secure container I have installed in my truck.

I will be taking some extremely valuable items with me on this trip and I don’t want them to get stolen and I can’t take them into the facilities I’m going into.

(Trust me, you will read all about this soon enough.)

So what to do.

When you watch the video, you will notice two things:

  1. They moved very fast.
  2. The only tool they used was something to break the window, and it was small. Maybe a center punch or something.

That’s good news.

It means defeating these people can be done with anything that slows them down and requires tools.

Again, nothing is perfect, it it doesn’t look like these assholes are willing to start fucking around with bolt cutters and grinders.

My most valuable items will be in a Pelican case with padlocks.

Of course, that alone is not enough.  The box needs to be secured to the vehicle.

That is where a security cable with loops on each end comes in.  Those are cheap.  You can buy them at a hardware store or on Amazon for $10.

Now you have to know what to secure it to.

SUVs generally have cargo tie-down spots in the trunk. Cars don’t. You can secure it to the spare under the trunk floor cover.  In my car, there is a steel loop. Welded to the car body that held the jack in place. I got my car used so the jack was missing. I can key lock to that.

In the cabin or behind the seat, there is also a LATCH system attachment point for car seats.  That is very strong and can accommodate a padlock.

Many cars have a pass through from the trunk to the cabin. Usually the center armrest in the rear seat. A four foot security cable can reach from the trunk to a rear seat LATCH point.

A good padlock, a cable lock, and a Pelican case will defeat these guys.

If a Pelican case is too expensive, I’ve been impressed with the Harbor Freight version APACHE case.

For soft items, you can use a steel wire mesh bag by Pacsafe.

Here is a video of one in use:

 

You can also just buy sheets of that wire mesh from Amazon, and using a cable and lock, make your own for odd size or shape bags.

Once again, locking it to a tie-down or LATCH location.

I get it, it’s a hassle and you shouldn’t have to do it.

But wish in one hand and shit in the other.

If you need to travel to areas like this, you can take precautions that for less than $100, will secure what you own from theft.

 

 

Gun Free Zone

Airplane Size Comparison

https://theawesomer.com/photos/2022/10/airplane_size_comparison_t.jpg

Airplane Size Comparison

Link

The smallest plane we’ve flown on was a 4-seat Cessna, and the biggest was a Boeing 777. But there are much smaller and much larger airplanes out there. RED SIDE created this computer-generated clip of these flying machines ranging from a 12.8 feet long single-seater all the way up to a gigantic 275-foot-long cargo jet.

The Awesomer

“Most notorious” illegal shadow library sued by textbook publishers [Updated]

https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/GettyImages-1437356693-760×380.jpg

“Most notorious” illegal shadow library sued by textbook publishers

Yesterday, some of the biggest textbook publishers sued Library Genesis, an illegal shadow library that publishers accused of “extensive violations of federal copyright law.”

Publishers suing include Cengage Learning, Macmillan Learning, McGraw Hill, and Pearson Education. They claimed that Library Genesis (aka Libgen) is operated by unknown individuals based outside the United States, who know that the shadow library is “one of the largest, most notorious, and far-reaching infringement operations in the world” and intentionally violate copyright laws with “absolutely no legal justification for what they do.”

According to publishers, Libgen offers free downloads for over 20,000 books that the publishers never authorized Libgen to distribute. They claimed that Libgen is “a massive piracy effort” and noted that their complaint may be updated if more infringed works are found. This vast infringement is causing publishers and authors serious financial and creative harm, publishers alleged.

“The Libgen sites deprive plaintiffs and their authors of income from their creative works, devalue the textbook market and plaintiffs’ works, and may cause plaintiffs to cease publishing certain works,” the complaint said.

This is not the first lawsuit to go after Libgen, and if history repeats, it likely won’t be the last. TorrentFreak reported that after the publisher Elsevier sued Libgen in 2015, a court ordered Libgen to shut down. But after briefly disappearing, Libgen popped back up and has been online ever since, operating in defiance of that order—as well as court orders “in several countries, including Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, and the United Kingdom,” publishers’ complaint filed yesterday said. Those countries even tried ordering “Internet service providers to block access to Libgen Sites as a result of infringement actions,” publishers said, all seemingly to no avail.

It’s hard to say if the new lawsuit will have better luck forcing Libgen offline. Publishers have asked a US district court in New York to order Libgen to pay damages that TorrentFreak estimated could exceed $30 million. They also want an order blocking Libgen from any future or ongoing infringement, an accounting and disgorgement of Libgen’s profits, the destruction of all Libgen’s copies of infringed works, and an order forcing all of Libgen’s domain names to either be transferred to publishers or deleted.

Anonymity is key to Libgen’s success

According to Similarweb data cited in the complaint, Libgen attracted “an average of over 9 million visitors per month from the United States” from March through May 2023. This includes tons of students whom publishers claimed are “bombarded with messages to use Libgen sites” on social media rather than paying full price for textbooks. This, publishers claimed, devalues the textbook market and caused a “substantial decline in revenue from sales.”

Instead of paying publishers to distribute books like a real library does, the complaint alleged, Libgen profits off pirated works by running advertisements alongside e-book downloads for things like online games and browser extensions. Sometimes Libgen’s ads, publishers claimed, “appear to be phishing attempts, which can result in users downloading a virus or other malicious program onto their computers.” Libgen also fields donations from users, reporting that it has raised $182,540 so far in 2023, the complaint noted.

Publishers said the key to Libgen’s success as a pirate website is its carefully guarded anonymity. Libgen staff, the publishers alleged, hide behind usernames like “librarian” or “bookwarrior” and rely “on proxy services that specifically conceal website operators’ identifying information.” As a business, Libgen never provides names or addresses as contact information, and when they register for new domains, they use registrars that “keep registrant information private and/or registrant proxy services.”

So far, they’ve proven seemingly impossible to unmask, but Libgen’s operators “are believed to reside outside of the United States at unknown foreign locations,” the complaint said. But while Libgen staff remains anonymous, publishers know that they also “rely on US companies as intermediaries to operate the sites,” and those companies could help disable the operation. Those companies include Cloudflare, Protocol Labs, Namecheap, and Google, which publishers claimed help to enable Libgen’s file-sharing, proxy services, domain registrations, and search engine services.

Thanks in part to these US companies, Libgen operators can “rely on the anonymity of the Internet and their overseas locations to hide their names and addresses and frustrate enforcement efforts against them,” publishers alleged.

Publishers hope their lawsuit will finally end years of Libgen’s alleged mass copyright infringement, but shadow libraries like Libgen have proven resilient through multiple attacks from the highest levels of US law enforcement. Even when the US government arrested operators of another shadow library called Z-Library last year, Z-Library returned a few months later and found a way to continue operating after the US seized its login domain.

Ars could not immediately reach publishers’ lawyers or Libgen for comment.

Ars Technica – All content

Brilliant: Doctors Open Therapy Center For Men That’s An MMA Octagon With A ‘Therapy’ Sign Out Front

https://media.babylonbee.com/articles/6504c376bc4df6504c376bc4e0.jpg

BATON ROUGE, LA — In the most successful advancement for men’s mental health in decades, therapists opened an office that is simply an MMA octagon with a sign outside saying “Therapy”.

“My cracked rib is all healed so I’m off to therapy again honey,” said local man Deron Thompson to his wife. “Ready to get back in there and, uh, really work through my issues.”

Dr. Tim Dillashaw and Dr. Domingo Cruz said the new office is already bursting with patients after opening the new office just last month. “It’s not that men won’t do therapy, it’s just that no one has been offering actual therapy for men,” said Dr. Cruz. “You don’t need to lay on a couch. You need to lay on the mat while your opponent is throwing haymakers in full mount and learn how to fight your way back to your feet. Now if you’ll excuse me, I have a patient to choke out.”

According to sources, the incognito MMA studio has produced stunning therapeutic results. “All of that stress from work suddenly didn’t matter so much when I was losing oxygen from an arm triangle,” said local patient Timothy Traeger. “I got absolutely pummeled during my first session and walked away feeling more alive than I’d felt in months. I tried and failed a million stress management techniques. Turns out, all I needed was to learn how to pass guard and make my buddy tap with an armbar.”

At publishing time, patients’ wives had reported tremendous satisfaction in their husbands’ new willingness to attend therapy, though they did express concern over why their husbands always returned from therapy limping.


In Disney’s upcoming reboot of 1937’s Snow White, will the Prince kiss the sleeping princess? Or will he obtain her consent first?

Subscribe to our YouTube channel for more tactical instruction

Babylon Bee

How Google Authenticator Made One Company’s Network Breach Much, Much Worse

A security company is calling out a feature in Google’s authenticator app that it says made a recent internal network breach much worse. ArsTechnica: Retool, which helps customers secure their software development platforms, made the criticism on Wednesday in a post disclosing a compromise of its customer support system. The breach gave the attackers responsible access to the accounts of 27 customers, all in the cryptocurrency industry. The attack started when a Retool employee clicked a link in a text message purporting to come from a member of the company’s IT team. It warned that the employee would be unable to participate in the company’s open enrollment for health care coverage until an account issue was fixed. The text arrived while Retool was in the process of moving its login platform to security company Okta. Most of the targeted Retool employees took no action, but one logged in to the linked site and, based on the wording of the poorly written disclosure, presumably provided both a password and a temporary one-time password, or TOTP, from Google authenticator. Shortly afterward, the employee received a phone call from someone who claimed to be an IT team member and had familiarity with the "floor plan of the office, coworkers, and internal processes of our company." During the call, the employee provided an "additional multi-factor code." It was at this point, the disclosure contended, that a sync feature Google added to its authenticator in April magnified the severity of the breach because it allowed the attackers to compromise not just the employee’s account but a host of other company accounts as well.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Slashdot

Laravel SchemaForge

https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:1200/1*Swb4pEdKwDPUsStSP2Fi9A.pngLaravel SchemaForge is a powerful Laravel package designed to simplify and streamline the process of database schema design, CRUD view generation, and API resource method creation within Laravel applicationsLaravel News Links

Lawyer Comes Unglued

I was giving a deposition a few years ago when I sued my mortgage holder, SunTrust bank. I had gone through a Chapter 7 bankruptcy and it had been discharged. There was a court order, so they weren’t allowed to do anything to collect the debt. All they were permitted to do was foreclose on the house.

Here is the problem- it turned out that they were NOT the mortgage holder. They had lied to the bankruptcy court. They tried all sorts of tactics- they forged a note. They lied to the court. None of that worked, and they were unable to foreclose on the house. So they resorted to sending collection agents to my house, and calling me repeatedly on the phone. I wound up suing them 5 times in 4 years and collecting more than $40,000 in damages. They still kept it up, with a collector calling me a deadbeat who doesn’t pay his bills, so I sued them again.

So that’s how we wound up in the deposition. I brought my attorney. One part of the deposition went like this:

Divemedic: I have a tape of your client’s collectors harassing me on the phone and calling me a deadbeat

SunTrust Lawyer: Did you ever think, even once, that if you paid your bills, the calls and visits would stop?

DM: Are you telling me that you and your client are knowingly violating the orders of the Federal Bankruptcy court to collect this debt in violation of Federal Law?

STL (to the court reporter): Stop recording this. This is off the record. (To my attorney): You need to remind your client that I am an officer of the court, and he needs to be civil, or we will ask for contempt charges.

My Lawyer: (to me) You heard her. You have to be civil.

DM: (to my lawyer) This is still off the record, right?

My Lawyer: Yes.

DM (To STL): Kiss my ass.

The SunTrust lawyer came unglued and ended the deposition at that point. On the way out, my lawyer told me that my comment was the funniest thing he ever heard at a deposition. We wound up settling the lawsuit for five figures, but I can’t comment on how much because of an NDA. That was almost ten years ago, and I still laugh about it.

Area Ocho