Primitive Technology shows us how to make a very simple blower that can easily keep a small furnace going. The blower is made of a stick, a rectangular piece of bark that acts as a rotor, and a length of twine that can be pulled to spin its blade.
OFFICIAL: The New Gen5 GLOCK Has Arrived
Yes, it’s real. The hotly anticipated fifth generation of GLOCK pistols is set to become publicly available in a matter of days. For die hard fans like myself, most of the features of the new Gen5 G17 and G19 models will come as little surprise – they are all found on the heavily reported ‘M’ line […]
The post OFFICIAL: The New Gen5 GLOCK Has Arrived appeared first on The Firearm Blog.
via The Firearm Blog
OFFICIAL: The New Gen5 GLOCK Has Arrived
The 5th Generation GLOCK Glock 17 and Glock 19 Gen5 Pistols: Improving Perfection! (4K UHD)
In this very special episode of TFBTV, James has the privilege of introducing you the Glock’s new Generation 5 series of pistols. James was asked to visit Glock Headquarters in Smyrna, Georgia and shoot a case of ammunition through the new Gen. 5 Glock 17 and 19 at the Glock Operator Course over a two […]
The post The 5th Generation GLOCK Glock 17 and Glock 19 Gen5 Pistols: Improving Perfection! (4K UHD) appeared first on The Firearm Blog.
via The Firearm Blog
The 5th Generation GLOCK Glock 17 and Glock 19 Gen5 Pistols: Improving Perfection! (4K UHD)
GLOCK Gen 5 Safe Action Pistols , First Look at New GLOCK 17 & 19
Duncan Johnson gives AmmoLand News our first look at the GLOCK Gen 5 Safe Action Pistols.
GLOCK fanboys rejoice, a new generation is born, and as always it’s GLOCK perfection. The fifth generation has arrived for the G17 and G19 handguns.
U.S.A. –-(Ammoland.com)- K.I.S.S. Keep it Simple, Stupid. Not so long ago, I had a teacher tell me that.
When he said to keep it simple, that didn’t mean do the bare minimum. He was saying to do what was needed, without trying to look cool or flashy. Still doing what was asked for, without comprising what your goals are. For GLOCK, their goal is creating the perfect defensive pistol, right out of the factory box. Reliable, accurate, and safe.
If ever there was a firearms company based around the concept of, K.I.S.S., it is almost certainly the polymer pistol kings, GLOCK.
GLOCK Gen 5 Safe Action Pistols
Proudly claiming new or upgraded 35 parts, the Gen 5 is almost everything that consumers have asked for. Between the Gen 4 and Gen 5, there are twenty changes in the design of the firearm. I had the opportunity to shoot the newest G17 generation, first at the GLOCK facility in Smyrna, GA and then a whole bunch after. I will tell you all now: out of the box, from the factory, this is hands down the best GLOCK Generation I have had the chance to shoot.
If you think this is comparable to an iPhone release, or a Gen 4.75, I would advise you to think again. I am not a GLOCK fanboy. In fact, this is the GLOCK that changed my mind. Before the Gen 5, I was in love with my SIG P320. Now after shooting the G17 Gen 5, I feel a change in my heart and my head. If you think it has to do with the lack of finger grooves your right, it does, but it is also because of how undeniably smooth shooting GLOCKS are. If you were hoping for the GLOCK Carbine so was I. Instead, we got the best GLOCK Safe Action Pistols yet to exist. Here are my thoughts on the ins and outs of G17 Gen 5.
Outside of the Glock 17 Gen 5 Handgun
When you look at this newest Generation of GLOCK pistols you will obviously be drawn to the immediate aesthetic differences from previous models.
The first change you will see is that there are no longer finger grooves on the GLOCK Gen 5. For me, this is all the difference in the world when picking up a GLOCK. Removing the grooves, was a big step toward GLOCK making a pistol that I can get on the gas and quick-draw from a holster, without sliding my fingers into the right spaces.
You might also notice the flared magwell. This is not a competition-style magwell that you can fit your entire hand in, but it is ideal for faster reloads, without being in the way. In reality, this shows the core of GLOCK’s design, an accurate, defensive pistol. This is just one upgrade that shows that ethos in implementation.
Next, you will undoubtedly shift to the muzzle, where you may be slightly disappointed at the lack of front slide serrations. I must admit I was hoping for them, but this is part of the K.I.S.S. strategy. Functional as they might be, it still works without them. Keeping it simple, stupid.
What GLOCK did do to the slide, was bevel the muzzle, similar to the shape of the G34 Gen 4s. This reshaping will catch less material as you draw from a holster, it also removes the boxy look that other GLOCKs fall victim too. This slide, from outward appearances, is pretty sleek and gives the Gen 5 a more modern look.
Taking a view down the slide you have to be pleased with the updated sight picture that you will see. Although the polymer sights are still available, Gen 5 GLOCKs will now leave the factory with new styles of night sights, including the Ameriglo GLOCK Spartan Operator sets shown here. At night these sights are extremely visible, and ideal for providing for accurate shots in all lighting scenarios.
Further inspection of the slide will reveal ambidextrous slide stops. Lefties will be very happy with this GLOCK, at least left handed shooters will be, not so much the political ones. With my offhand (left-hand) I am easily able to release the slide stop using my thumb, the same way I would with my dominate hand.
Overall, from outward appearances, you may be saying this looks like every other GLOCK, minus the finger grooves and some new sights. Wait until you see the internals, and then the gun shooting, to really understand why this Generation Five is such an update and improvement to the G17.
Inside the GLOCK 17 Gen 5
Side by side you can see some differences between the Gen 4(left) and Gen 5(right). First among them is a reshaping of the firing pin safety. Instead of the circular metal pin, GLOCK has reshaped the firing pin safety into a squared ledge with ramping on either side. This ramping will assist in the trigger bar moving more smoothly against the firing pin safety. Less noticeable in this picture, yet still another improvement is the GLOCK Marksman Barrel. This barrel features a smaller crown, providing a tighter fit for projectiles. At 50 yards I had zero issues putting dings on a 6” steel plate.
As a quick side note, those of you already flush with Gen 3 and 4 magazines, will be happy to find out they will all work with the new Gen 5 models. Holsters that accommodate previous Generations, should also function with the Gen 5.
The trigger mechanism in the Gen 4 (top) and the Gen 5 (bottom) have some differences. The trigger bar no longer attaches to a spring that sits on the connector. In the Gen 5, the trigger bar slides into a space on the trigger mechanism housing. The trigger return spring in the Gen 5 has been replaced and moved inside the mechanism housing.
Finally, GLOCK added a new ion-bonded coating to all Gen 5 handguns. The new nDLC finish is more resistant and offers better protection than previous generations. Also, GLOCK has returned to a two pin system and eliminated the Locking Block Pin. In my opinion, fewer parts is always a good thing.
Shooting the G17 GLOCK Gen 5 Safe Action Pistol
Out of the box, I have never been one to fall in love with a GLOCK, until the Gen 5. In all honesty, I shot a P320, until I started shooting the Gen 5. Now it has become my go to pistol. I might not even change anything about it, I like it that much. People’s heads are probably spinning with comments, but I am telling you to go find someone with a Gen 5 and shoot it. This is a GLOCK above the rest.
If you want to know why I am going to make the switch, for one the science of a lower bore axis really cannot be disputed. Follow up shots and reacquiring a sight picture are much easier with a GLOCK, especially while moving and shooting. Second would be the removal of the finger grips, which was huge for me, now I can comfortably get my hand on the gun. Third, during the media event at GLOCK headquarters, 10 writers fired a minimum of 700+ rounds each without a single mechanical issue. I also ran some 147 gr, polymer coated hand-loads that worked flawlessly in the G17 Gen 5. Again, as I said above, hits to 50 yards proved no challenge with this firearm. Overall, I really could not ask for more out of this or any other handgun. Reliable, accurate, and safe.
Now, I am proud to say I have been converted. My SIG P320 will be taking a rest, and enjoy some vacation time while it goes in for a “voluntary upgrade”. Meanwhile, my new best friend will be hitting the range with me.
The G17 Gen 5, keeping it simple and still achieving GLOCK perfection.
About Duncan Johnson:
Duncan Johnson is a graduate of George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia. His focus of studies were on History and Government. Duncan is a regular contributor to AmmoLand and assists in the everyday gun-news publishing as an assistant editor.
- Twitter: @Duncan_AMLND
- Instagram: @duncan_amlnd
This post GLOCK Gen 5 Safe Action Pistols , First Look at New GLOCK 17 & 19 appeared first on AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News .
via AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News
GLOCK Gen 5 Safe Action Pistols , First Look at New GLOCK 17 & 19
Inside The Struggle For Survival Onboard The USS Fitzgerald
Just days before the USS John S. McCain was involved in the U.S. Navy’s latest collision-at-sea, the Navy released a report on the June accident involving the USS Fitzgerald which caused the death of seven sailors. The report is a supplement to the line of duty investigation being conducted and details the circumstances of the deaths of seven sailors who drowned after the berthing compartment in which they were sleeping became flooded in under a minute.
Because of the collision the Fitzgerald’s commanding officer, executive officer and the top enlisted sailor were relieved of their duties and will face non-judicial punishment for their roles in the destroyer’s accident. The twin at-sea accidents have caused ripples across the Navy.
Advertisement
Adm. John Richardson, the Chief of Naval Operations, has asked for an “operational pause” across the surface fleet. And according to Navy Times the commanding officer of the Pacific Fleet has questioned the focus of the fleet, saying in a message to the leadership of all warships that these recent accidents have occurred while the ships were conducting “the most basic of operations.”
Even China is concerned about the U.S. Navy’s ability to safely operate its ships in the Pacific region. According to the South China Morning Post, China is worried that the real threat of the U.S. Navy is not to their military, but rather to commercial shipping.
USS Fitzgerald has remained at her homeport of Yokosuka, Japan, since shortly after the collision but yesterday the Navy announced that the ship will travel back to the U.S. for repairs as Huntington Ingalls Industries in Pascagoula, Mississippi, will repair the destroyer. No date was given though it is expected the contract will be issued before the end of the year.
Advertisement
The supplemental report issued on August 17 provides a harrowing look at the struggle for those sailors sleeping in the affected berthing compartment. The large hole from the bulbous bow of the ACX Crystal allowed so much water to rush in quickly that “no damage control efforts would have prevented” the berthing compartment from flooding completely within two minutes. The window for survival was minimal but the sailors approached the task with calmness and an orderly process that allowed most to survive.
The Collision
The Fitzgerald left Yokosuka Naval Base, Japan early on the morning of June 16 for a normal underway period that was scheduled to be just routine training of ship and crew. Less than 24 hours later, early on the morning of June 17 the destroyer was still within sight of land. The sea was calm with waves between two to four feet. The moon was bright with scattered cloud cover and visibility was unrestricted. Fitzgerald was operating in the standard condition of “darkened ship,” meaning all exterior lighting was secured except for the navigation lights, and interior lighting was set to red to reflect the nighttime conditions. The destroyer was set for condition “Modified Zebra,” which means that all doors and hatches at the main deck and decks below were shut to help create boundaries within the ship that could contain flooding or fire should one occur while underway. Should a casualty happen, these boundaries would hopefully compartmentalize the damage, preventing fire or flooding to spread rapidly throughout the ship.
Approximately 1:30 a.m., the Fitzgerald and the ACX Crystal collided. As previously disclosed, the port (left) side of the ACX Crystal’s bow struck the starboard (right) side of the destroyer above the waterline, while beneath the waves, the bulbous bow of the container ship hit the warship, puncturing the hull and creating a hole nearly 13 by 17 feet wide. The second and third decks were torn into and water poured into Auxiliary Machine Room 1 (AUX 1) and pushed the wall separating AUX 1 from Berthing 2 inward, bending it to a nearly 90-degree angle. Berthing 2, with beds for 42 sailors, was now wide open to the on-rushing sea.
Advertisement
Immediately following the collision, Fitzgerald had a 14-degree list to port, meaning the ship had been pushed to the left by the freighter. However, as the water rushed into the ship through Berthing 2 below the waterline, the destroyer became heavier and sank further into the water and the port list quickly became a starboard list of seven degrees.
External communications were immediately lost and power to the forward part of the ship was also lost. The running, or navigation, lights atop the destroyer’s mast were duly changed to what is called “red over red.” One red light over another is the internationally recognized indication that the vessel is not able to maneuver as expected as an incident has occurred.
Berthing 2
As mentioned above, Berthing 2 is able to house 42 sailors, located two decks below the Fitzgerald’s main deck. The space runs from the port side to the starboard side and is approximately 29 feet long by 40 feet across. The overhead, or ceiling, is about 10 feet high. The 42 beds are stacked three high, meaning there are 14 stacks of three and the space also included a small lounge which would have had a TV, table and chairs and a sofa for those assigned to Berthing 2 to relax. At 1:30 a.m., the space was lit only via red light to match that the of “darkened ship.” Berthing 2 has three points of exit, two of which are on the port side.
Advertisement
Only 35 of the possible 42 sailors were in Berthing 2 at the time of impact. Five others were on watch and two were not on-board. Twenty-eight sailors would escape the compartment but seven, fatally, would not. As would be expected, confusion ruled in the moments following the collision. Some sailors who survived reported that they were unsure what had happened while others slept through those first moments. Almost immediately, warning cries went out including, “Get out,” and “Water on deck!”
It has been estimated by survivors that Berthing 2 was nearly flooded within up to 60 seconds. Water was waist deep as sailors began to scramble up a ladder to safety as all manner of debris began swirling around the rushing water. Mattresses, furniture, wall lockers and even an exercise bicycle clogged the aisles, making the task of escaping for those trapped all the more perilous. With power out to the forward portion of the ship, not even the red lighting was on. Instead, lighting was coming from battle lanterns which hang from the ceiling. In near total darkness, dodging debris and the onrushing sea, 35 sailors were guided only by the sporadic beams of light coming from the suspended battle lanterns.
Advertisement
Despite the situation’s calamity, sailors reported that the attempted exodus from Berthing 2 was calm and orderly. The sailors lined up on the port side of the berthing space to exit via the port side ladder. There was no rush, no pushing and fighting to get out first, and sailors were helping other sailors who were in need, even though at this point water was up to most of their necks.
At the bottom of the port ladder, two sailors were leading the exit from Berthing 2, making sure the egress was done in the quickest manner possible as the water continued to rise from the hole in Fitzgerald’s hull. With it no longer possible to be at the bottom of the ladder, the two sailors were eventually forced to exit. Making sure no other sailors could be seen in the churning water, these two climbed the ladder and moved to the next level, moving though the watertight scuttle that—once closed—would keep the flooding contained below. Though now in Berthing 1 and in relative safety, these two sailors continued to search for those who may be trapped below. Reaching into the dark water over and over again hoping to find someone still struggling to escape Berthing 2, their efforts were rewarded, as two more shipmates were found. Those two were completely underwater, pulled through the watertight scuttle and away from certain death.
The last sailor to be pulled through the watertight scuttle told investigators that he had been in the head (bathroom) at the time of impact. The rushing water had knocked him to the floor and he had to fight his way out of the bathroom. Lockers from the berthing area were all around him, and at one point he was pinned between the ceiling and a locker as the water rose within the compartment. Pulling himself free by grabbing onto piping in the ceiling he moved toward the only light that he was able to see. The light was coming from the port ladder through the watertight scuttle where the two sailors who had been orchestrating the exit were still trying to find others to save. Swimming to the light, he was pulled from the water and through the scuttle. This sailor said he had taken his last breath and had already ingested water when he was grabbed.
Even after that, with more seawater pouring in, the opening above Berthing 2 into Berthing 1 began to flood but the two sailors who were leading the effort continued to reach into the water hoping to grab someone who might still be saved. They tried yelling into the compartment but there was no response and no shadows were seen in the water. By this point, the water coming into Berthing 1 was shooting through the watertight scuttle and with no indication that anyone else was trying to reach them, the decision was made to shut the scuttle. That scuttle could only be partially closed, though, forcing the sailors to evacuated climb a ladder to the next-highest level, which was the main level. Here they secured a hatch and watertight scuttle, keeping the flooding from getting any higher in the ship.
Advertisement
Twenty-eight sailors escaped Berthing 2 with 27 of them using the port ladder. Only one sailor escaped through the starboard side. That sailor was in his bed at the top of a stack of three. At the time of the collision, the sailor tried to get out, but in doing so accidentally kicked another sailor and decided to wait until he could exit his bed without hitting anyone else. When he finally went to jump out, the water level was already at chest level. Moving against the sea and dodging lounge furniture, he quickly went underwater. Finding a small air pocket, he took a few breaths and began to swim for his life. At some point during his escape, he lost consciousness and does not remember how he escaped from Berthing 2. The sailor remembers coming out of the waters into Berthing 1 and escaping to the main deck.
The seven sailors who died on Fitzgerald had beds that were closet to the point of impact on the starboard side and directly in the path of the flooding seawater.
Other Damage
The Fitzgerald suffered other structural damage which included the Officer Stateroom; Repair Locker Number 2 passageway; the Combat Information Center passageway; multiple fan rooms from a space, the name of which was redacted; Combat Systems Maintenance Central airlock and ladderwell; Electronic Workshop Number 1; and the Commanding Officer’s stateroom and bathroom.
Advertisement
The destroyer’s captain, Cmdr. Bryce Benson, was asleep in his cabin when the port bow of the ACX Crystal struck the cabin directly, trapping him inside. Benson was able to call the bridge for assistance and five sailors responded to rescue him. Using a sledgehammer, kettlebell and their bodies to bang against the twisted bulkheads and door, they pried the door open far enough for one sailor to squeeze through. Three other sailors were able to clear debris from the door area and enter the officer’s cabin. The outer skin of the ship was gone and the sailors reported that the night sky could clearly be seen. Tying themselves together to form a chain they rescued Benson, who had been left hanging from the side of the ship after the impact.
The final reports have yet to be written regarding the Fitzgerald collision, and the McCain investigations have just begun. On the day the report was released, the Seventh Fleet, which has command of the region where the destroyers were struck, laid most of the blame on the Fitzgerald’s crew: “The collision was avoidable and both ships (ACX Crystal and Fitzgerald) demonstrated poor seamanship. With Fitzgerald, flawed watch stander teamwork and inadequate leadership contributed to the collision that claimed the lives of seven Fitzgerald Sailors, injured three more, and damaged both ships.”
Advertisement
There will always be failures and Fitzgerald is one of them. The Navy is usually pretty good at taking its lessons learned and implementing changes that will correct the mistakes. Unfortunately for the crew of the McCain, which is part of the same destroyer squadron, the example of poor leadership and complacency exhibited by its sistership Fitzgerald, were not heeded. And, again, sailors are dead.
Gary Wetzel is an experienced military and aviation writer who has authored two books examining the combat operations of the A-10 Warthog in Afghanistan. He also served over six years in the U.S Navy as sonar technician aboard USS Philadelphia and USS Dallas.
via Gizmodo
Inside The Struggle For Survival Onboard The USS Fitzgerald
This Incredible Time Lapse of the High Plains During the Eclipse Brought Me to Tears
Folks yak a lot of crap about the High Plains—mainly they complain about it being flat or boring as they drive down the infinitely straight highways. But a tour of places like Western Nebraska or South Dakota reveals a sublime landscape beneath a vast sky, accompanied by the humbling realization that you are just one tiny human on this very big, stormy planet.
A video probably can’t capture the feeling like a pickup truck and a guitar can, but this new release from the SKYGLOW project comes pretty close. The project’s producers headed to Carhenge, a very silly Stonehenge recreation, to present STORMHENGE.
Advertisement
The team produced the time lapse video over four shoots from 2015 to 2017 at the Western Nebraska site, which consists of 39 painted cars arranged in a 100-foot circle like the British counterpart. The region experiences both clear days and nights as well as violent storms thanks to its location, and both are captured in the video.
Carhenge received more than its usual share of spotlight this year, however, given its location along the Great American Eclipse’s path of totality. If you’re looking to experience the majesty of the eclipse again, the video’s got that for you as well.
Advertisement
As part of the larger SKYGLOW book and video project, the STORMHENGE video seeks to raise awareness of light pollution and capture the country’s starry skies before they disappear because of bright cities. You can read more about the project and book here.
Clearly, anyone who talks smack about the High Plains hasn’t stopped to take in the full majesty of its starry skies.
[SKYGLOW h/t Gavin Heffernan]
via Gizmodo
This Incredible Time Lapse of the High Plains During the Eclipse Brought Me to Tears
Shadow of the Eclipse
Lots of us stayed outside to watch the big solar eclipse this week, but this isn’t the view any of us saw. Instead of looking up at the skies, the University of Wisconsin Madison time-lapsed weather satellite imagery to track the shadow of the moon as it crossed the US.
Jury awards $417M to woman who says she got cancer from talc in baby powder
Simon Dawson/Bloomberg via Getty Images
A Los Angeles jury awarded a woman a $417 million verdict yesterday. The jury found that Johnson & Johnson failed to adequately warn users of the cancer risks of the talc in its baby powder.
The jury’s 9-3 vote to hold J&J liable for not warning Eva Echeverria about cancer risks is a huge blow to the company, which is facing thousands of such claims across the country. The verdict consists of $70 million in compensatory damages and $347 million in punitive damages, according to Reuters.
No clear link connects talcum powder to ovarian cancer. Some case-control studies, based on asking women who have ovarian cancer about their history, have found a slightly increased risk. But as the American Cancer Society notes, those kinds of studies can be biased because they rely on a person’s memory of talc use years after the fact.
Two prospective cohort studies, which don’t suffer from that type of hindsight bias, found no increased risk.
It is plausible, scientists say, that talcum powder applied to the genitals could travel through the vagina and into the ovaries, causing inflammation. Since inflammation increases the risk of cancer, it’s possible that talc causes cancer. But, again, the two most rigorous studies didn’t find any link.
Harvard University epidemiologist Daniel Cramer has published several studies, beginning in 1982, that found a link between talc exposure and increased ovarian cancer. Cramer worked as a paid consultant for the plaintiff’s lawyers in a St. Louis case that resulted in a $72 million verdict against J&J.
Talc, a clay mineral found around the world, is often used in powder form as a moisture-absorbing product and sold as talcum powder. “Baby powder” is a marketing term for cosmetic products that can be made from corn starch, talc, and other powders. Earlier versions of talcum powder sometimes contained asbestos, a known cancer-causing agent. But asbestos hasn’t been present in talcum powder in the US since the 1970s.
Landmark verdict
The Echeverria case was the first California talc case to go to trial, and the jury’s massive figure will set a new standard for the many talc cases to come. Hundreds more are in earlier stages of litigation in California alone.
The 63-year-old woman used J&J’s products for decades before she developed terminal ovarian cancer. Echeverria’s lawyers said that J&J encouraged women to use the product, despite knowing about studies linking talc and ovarian cancer.
The case was the first state trial outside of Missouri, Bloomberg reported. J&J has faced five Missouri trials over the last two years and lost four of them. The company has been hit with verdicts as high as $110 million.
“J&J needs to see they not only have verdicts against them in St. Louis; they now also have them in Los Angeles,” Mark Robinson, Echeverria’s lawyer, told Bloomberg. “There’s a problem all over the country with women using talcum powder on a daily basis for 10, 20, 30, 40 years.”
J&J has said they will appeal the case.
“We are guided by the science, which supports the safety of Johnson’s Baby Powder,” a J&J spokesperson told Bloomberg. “We are preparing for additional trials in the US, and we will continue to defend the safety of Johnson’s Baby Powder.”
Bloomberg, which tallies large verdicts and settlements, says that yesterday’s jury verdict was the third-largest of 2017. The largest (for $500 million) was ZeniMax’s February win against Facebook over its virtual reality headset.
via Ars Technica
Jury awards $417M to woman who says she got cancer from talc in baby powder
Five Handguns I Can’t Live Without
by Austin Knudsen
I don’t read as many gun magazines as I used to. But there are a few articles that are seared into my memory. One such article was written several years ago by Sheriff Jim Wilson: a countdown of the five handguns he couldn’t live without. So I thought, why reinvent the wheel? Let’s go down that rabbit hole again! If I’m forced to get rid of all but five handguns (the horror…) which would I keep? In no particular order…
1. Smith & Wesson Model 17 .22LR
When new shooters ask me what gun they should buy, I recommend a .22LR. I tell them to shoot it, shoot it, and shoot it some more. There’s simply no better way to become a proficient shooter. They’re fun and cheap to shoot. You can learn all of the fundamentals of handgun shooting without the expense and recoil of bigger calibers.
This Smith & Wesson Model 17 — known by S&W-er’s as a “K-22” — was my first handgun. Dad gave it me when I was a teenager. I lost count of the gophers this baby has dispatched. Not to brag, but I’m a crack shot with this wheel gun.
After 20 years of carry and use, 10-round Model 17-8 went back to the factory for a new cylinder. The original alloy cylinder went kaput due to a poor ratchet/timing design on this particular engineering run (during the Clinton-era, bad ol’ days of Smith). It now sports a stainless steel 10-shot cylinder with redesigned ratchet, fitted at no cost.
Even though the stainless cylinder looks a little jarring on that blued frame, this old girl still shoots as well as ever. The 10-shot cylinder means I’m not spending as much time reloading. The six-inch barrel, excellent S&W target sights and perfect single action trigger (I’ve hardly ever fired it double action) make this little gem my absolute favorite handgun in the world. While you can make a good argument for your Ruger MKII/III/IV or Browning Buck Mark, this is the handgun that made me a handgunner and a revolver man for life.
The medium-framed .357 Magnum revolver may be the most versatile handgun (firearm?) ever made. It can be loaded with light .38 specials for pleasure and target shooting, or full-bore .357 magnums in 125-158 grain hollow points for personal defense, or heavy-loaded with hard cast lead bullets in the 173-180 grain range for wilderness use. Hell, you can load it with shot shells.
Introduced in 1980, the Smith & Wesson L frame was designed specifically for the .357 Magnum cartridge. This after Smith learned that extensive use of hot magnum loads through .357 Magnum chambered K frames (models 13, 19, 65, 66) ditched out more abuse than the smaller K-frames could handle.
Beefier than the K frame but not as massive as the N frame, the L frame models could take the steady pounding of heavy .357 magnum loads and keep on ticking.
For the first time in its production history S&W installed full underlugged barrels on the L frames. This was a fairly blatant marketing jab at the Colt Python, S&W’s biggest competitor in the police service revolver market at the time.
My 686 spent the first decade in my possession as a 8 3/8-inch barreled behemoth that shot almost nothing except bulk 158 grain lead semi-wadcutter .38 specials. I used it to keep the exploding, destructive beaver population on our place in check. Later, I re-barreled the wheel gun to 4 inches – much easier to carry and better balance – and carried it as my concealed weapon for a few years before I had any gray hair. Or brains.
The double action trigger is smooth and consistent. The single action trigger is, in a word, magnificent. Nowadays, the 686 is still one of my go-to, on-the-farm, around-the-yard handguns and is my usual sidearm of choice when I’m deer or upland bird hunting in northeast Montana.
In the summer months, I keep the first two chambers loaded with CCI shot shells to dispatch the inevitable rattlesnakes around the farmyard, and the other four are usually loaded with lead 158 grain .38 special handloads. While it may not be as sexy as the newest striker fired semi-auto, the six-shot .357 Magnum revolver will teach you to slow down, aim steady and make your shots count.
3. Smith & Wesson 1911sc E-series .45ACP
The third handgun I owned was an old imported surplus Argentine Colt 1911 with an arched mainspring housing, tiny sights and a spur hammer that bit the web of my hand and made it bleed every time I shot it. I now own a couple of modern 911s that rectify those problems, The version that really blows my skirt up: Smith & Wesson’s lightweight framed, round-butted, commander length version, the S&W 1911sc E-series.
The 4¼-inch commander length pistol is easier to carry and conceal, while avoiding the reliability problems that can plague 1911s with shorter barrels. The frame is made of a lightweight aluminum/scandium alloy, making it a) lighter than the original steel frame, and b) more durable than a pure aluminum frame.
Smith & Wesson also rounded the frame; a modification that used to be strictly custom. This modified frame has two benefits: 1) it makes the pistol a little less likely to print under a concealed carry garment and 2) it makes the pistol even more comfortable in the hand, a feat that I didn’t think possible when it comes to the already-comfortable 1911 platform.
The 1911sc comes standard with Novak-style Trijicon tritium night sights and all the features we expect today on a standard 1911. I added the short trigger and strong side-only safety based on my own personal preferences, and replaced some of the more breakage-prone MIM parts (yes, I’ve witnessed it, though not in this gun) with machined Ed Brown parts. And yes, those are Dan Wesson Guardian grips.
The 1911sc is now in my regular concealed carry rotation. While not as light as a polymer 9mm pistol, it’s a good 10 oz. or lighter than a full-size, all steel 1911, yet still holds as many rounds and uses the same magazines. After carrying a full size 1911 on your hip for a few days, you’ll begin to notice the weight and appreciate something lighter, but which offers you the same feel, controls, capacity, and reliability of the 1911.
4. Ruger Blackhawk .45 Colt
In case you hadn’t guessed, I’m a revolver man first and foremost. At some point, I discovered the writings of an old Montana cowboy named Elmer Keith, the father of the .44 Magnum cartridge, the .41 Magnum cartridge, the Smith & Wesson models 29 and 57 revolvers, the .338 Winchester Magnum cartridge and the Winchester model 70 rifle. (How’s that for a pedigree?)
As a Keith disciple, I shot and reloaded the .44 Magnum for years, using Keith’s personal 250-grain lead bullet design (a modified semi-wadcutter, Lyman mould 429421). The round was cast, sized and lubed by my own hands and propelled by 21 grains of Alliant 2400 (Keith’s pet load) from of a Smith & Wesson model 629 revolver.
And then I stumbled upon the writings of a Wyoming gunsmith named John Linebaugh.
Linebaugh argued that, given a strong enough revolver, a heavily loaded .45 Colt could do anything the .44 Magnum could do with less internal case pressures. This point intrigued me, as I had seen plenty of pictures of exploded .44 Magnum revolvers, and their oftentimes injured owners, caused by reloaders pushing the pressure limits of the cartridge and their guns. So I started experimenting with heavy .45 Colt loads.
My heavy .45 Colt loads (which should only be fired from modern revolvers) consist of a 290 grain lead semi wadcutter bullet cast from RCBS mould 45-270-SAA, and 18.5 grains of Alliant 2400. It outperforms many factory .44 Magnum loads available. The recoil is substantial, though not as vicious as a hot .44 Magnum. I have no hesitation carrying this load into grizzly country, and should I have to clear leather on one of the big bruins, this load will do the job.
My heavy revolver of choice is the Ruger Blackhawk with a 5 ½” barrel.
The 5½” barrel length is short enough to carry all day and clear a holster, but still long enough to get good performance out of the load. If you’ve hiked while carrying heavy, 7+ inch barreled revolvers as much as I have, you learn after a few mountains that you might as well be carrying a boat anchor on your hip.
The Blackhawk’s aluminum grip frame and fluted cylinder (as opposed to the Super Blackhawk’s steel grip frame and unfluted cylinder) shaves weight from an already heavy gun, and makes a big difference when you’re packing it all day.
I prefer the Blackhawk’s single-action grip frame design for heavy loads like these. The single action grip design “pivots” in your hand under heavy recoil, as opposed to the double-action grip that delivers all of that recoil straight back into your palm. It’s like getting smacked in the palm of your hand with the business end of a baseball bat.
The Blackhawk’s robust, adjustable sights can be tailored for any load and are still tough enough to survive a week’s pack trip in the Bob Marshall Wilderness. And finally: ‘Murica. Nothing is more American than a single-action, blued revolver with pretty wood grips.
5. GLOCK 19
For decades, I swore I’d never own a GLOCK. I thought they were boxy, ugly, and utterly un-gun-like.That goofy steep grip angle just felt wrong, and there was no way plastic could possibly be as good as blue steel and wood. Plus, I had very little use for the 9mm cartridge at that point in my life.
At the urging of a friend, I bought a GLOCK 19 (Gen 3) to prove myself right. I carried that G19 almost every day for nearly four years. I carried it openly on the farm, crawling over fences, on horseback, on dirt bikes, on the tractor, and laying in the dirt servicing and repairing heavy equipment. I carried it concealed under a t-shirt, under a suit jacket, and under a winter coat.
I shot it — a lot — at everything from steel targets to skunks to rattlesnakes. And I’ll be damned if that GLOCK didn’t become one of the few guns with which I trust my life. The 19 has never bobbled, hiccupped or jammed on me (aside from some improperly sized reloaded rounds), despite minimal maintenance.
I’ll admit that my G19 has had some work done. It’s had a trigger job by a GLOCK armorer because stock GLOCK triggers suck. I gave it a set of Warren Sevigny Tactical fiber optic sights because stock GLOCK sights suck. And I had the grip reduced and the backstrap straightened by Springer Precision because the backstrap “hump” hit my hand wrong.
Now, you couldn’t pry my GLOCK 19 from my warm, living hands. This pistol taught me to never say never, and don’t knock it until you try it. I now own multiple GLOCK 9mms, including a 34 for competition, a 43 for deep concealment, and a 17 just because everyone should own a GLOCK 17. I probably shoot them more than any other pistols I own. And to add insult to my injury, I shoot them really well. That’s what I get for saying I’d never own a GLOCK.
So, that’s my list of the five handguns I couldn’t live without. What does your list look like?
The solar eclipse produced some fantastic photos—here are our favorites
-
This composite image, made from four frames, shows the International Space Station as it transits the Sun Monday.
NASA/Bill Ingalls -
A close-up view of the station, Sun, and Moon.
NASA/Bill Ingalls -
A total solar eclipse is seen on Monday, August 21, 2017 above Madras, Oregon.
NASA/Aubrey Gemignani -
This composite image shows the progression of a total solar eclipse over Madras, Oregon.
NASA/Aubrey Gemignani -
The last glimmer of the Sun is seen as the Moon makes its final move over the Sun during the total solar eclipse on Monday.
NASA/Aubrey Gemignani -
A total solar eclipse is seen on Monday, August 21, 2017 from onboard a NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center’s Gulfstream III 25,000 feet above the Oregon coast.
NASA/Carla Thomas -
The European Space Agency’s Proba-2 satellite captured partial eclipses from its viewpoint, 800 km above Earth.
ESA/Royal Observatory Belgium -
This composite image shows the progression of a partial solar eclipse over Ross Lake, in Northern Cascades National Park, Washington.
NASA/Bill Ingalls -
ESA astronaut Paolo Nespoli took this picture during the total solar eclipse of the Sun over the US on August 21, 2017.
ESA/NASA -
Another photo by Nespoli.
ESA/NASA -
Viewing the eclipse from orbit were NASA’s Randy Bresnik, Jack Fischer, and Peggy Whitson, ESA (European Space Agency’s) Paolo Nespoli, and Roscosmos’ Commander Fyodor Yurchikhin, and Sergey Ryazanskiy.
NASA -
Just to see if you clicked through to the end, here’s a photo of Lady Gaga taking in the eclipse. Although we don’t think those are proper eclipse glasses.
Lady Gaga/Instagram
On Monday, Ars writers shared some thoughts with readers about the total solar eclipse that spanned the United States and took some backyard photographs of the event. But let’s be honest; none of us are professional photographers, and we didn’t possess the right equipment to do the celestial event justice.
Fortunately, there’s a space agency for that. Two, even. And on Monday NASA and the European Space Agency deployed their resources on the ground and in space to capture the eclipse, doing so in stunning fashion. This gallery highlights everything from the International Space Station transiting the Sun during the eclipse, to astronauts on board the station itself taking pictures of the event back on Earth.
Listing image by NASA/Aubrey Gemignani
via Ars Technica
The solar eclipse produced some fantastic photos—here are our favorites