We are living in a sad time in Covid-world, where we can’t be there for our loved ones in times of need for the sake of their "health" and Australia might just be the most totalitarian of all.
A soft cooler is a lightweight, easy-to-transport solution for preserving fare on road trips, boats, campouts, trailheads, and park picnics. Here are our favorite iceboxes for the outdoors and adventure.
We’ll always have a spot in our gear closet for a hard cooler, but soft coolers have proven an equal utility. These designs weigh less, and are easy for one person to grab and quickly transport from the deck to the truck bed. There’s a broad range of sizes and softness — some of these designs are actually very rigid, stout, and stackable. Others are fully collapsible and pliable, and we celebrate the space-saving option for storage.
For day-long roams, weekend adventures, road trips, or running errands, these soft coolers kept our provisions chilled and fit the bill. For more information about soft coolers, check out our buyer’s guide and FAQ at the end of this article. Otherwise, scroll through to see all of our recommended buys or jump to the category you’re looking for:
The OtterBox Trooper 20 Cooler ($250) bummed us out at first because it lacks a comfortable handle on the lid like its littler discontinued version. But it aptly redeemed itself as hardy, dependable, and easy to operate.
We took this cooler on a two-person, 3,400-mile road trip from Colorado to Washington for ski mountaineering followed by ocean surfing. Then we linked up river surf spots through Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming, camping along the way.
The cooler was hauled in and out of the open truck bed countless times, faced torrential downpours, withstood sunshine, didn’t collapse under other stacked gear, and sat in mud at camp. The cooler didn’t take up too much space in the backseat, either. When posted up, we used the cooler for day trips. But on the road, we packed it full of beverages and snacks.
This cooler’s size, shape, and rigidity are convenient. The wide opening is appreciated for quick, easy access. The leakproof seal prevented melted ice from dripping out, and no rain seeped inside during storms.
The flat backside wall alleviates bounce when we’re using the shoulder strap. We appreciate the water-resistant exterior pocket, which is easy to open and close. We miss the top handle, but the two side grab handles are robust and ergonomic.
We were surprised how well the cooler retained ice despite being out in the elements, due to the premium thermal insulation. The heavy-duty base also increased the chill factor while stabilizing the cooler during transport and beneath items. The staunch base also allowed us to set the cooler on variable ground and was easy to clean.
According to our ice retention test, this cooler is capable of holding ice for up to 78 hours, which is what the brand claims. To put the size in perspective, this cooler could fit 28 12-ounce cans.
Specs:
Size: 14.3″ x 17.5″ x 10.25″
Capacity: 19 L
Weight: 3,175 g (6.5 lbs.)
Ice Retention Test: ~3+ days
Pros:
Durable cooler in sunshine or downpour
Leakproof lid
Easy to transport
Retains ice well
Cons:
We’d like a streamlined top-of-lid handle like on the discontinued smaller version
Closing the lid’s clasp requires attention to make sure it’s fully clamped
We took the YETI Hopper M30 Soft Cooler ($300) on a Southwest Colorado road trip to Hardrock 100 to race volunteer and car camp. We also used the cooler for picnics at the park.
The shoulder strap is really comfortable to slide over the shoulder, doesn’t slip around, and holds the cooler close to your side to prevent bounce. The exterior high-density fabric shell feels tough and is resistant to punctures as well as mildew. It’s a bonus that it doesn’t sweat like a few of the other soft coolers.
We were blown away by the power of the HydroShield closure, which uses magnets to create a leak-resistant seal along the top. No water can exit the tote. When the cooler is open, the mouth is wide.
We also give kudos to the closed-cell foam insulation of the tote. For the ice retention test, the cubes melted after 4 days. Inevitably, we had to be strategic with how we packed things, due to the tall, slim shame. This cute cooler could fit 20 12-ounce cans.
We have two critiques. There are two buckles that snap across the magnetic closure, and we wish those were more adjustable and easier to operate. If the cooler is really packed to the brim, we can’t close them. Then, we’d love to see YETI upgrade the cooler with an attachment system that keeps the magnetic closure open when you’re loading the cooler.
As is, the closure slams shut unless you have two hands on — but then you can’t grab your foodstuff. The powerful closure is also an issue for cleaning the cooler and letting the inside dry and air out. The only thing we could find that would keep the cooler open was a 5-pound water jug, and two people were needed to get it inside the cooler.
Specs:
Size: 25″ x 12″ x 17.5″
Capacity: 30 L
Weight: 3,175 g (7 lbs.)
Ice Retention Test: ~4 days
Pros:
Premium ice retention
Magnet closure is leakproof
Extremely robust material
Sturdy base and ability to sit upright
Large volume
Cons:
Magnet closure needs latch system to be propped open — it slams shut
The Arctic Zone Titan Deep Freeze Bucket Tote ($45) is a great budget cooler that keeps our ice cold for long durations. A trio took the cooler fly fishing on Colorado’s Gunnison River, carrying along water and various canned beverages. The temps that day hovered around 80 degrees.
Despite being left in the car for a full day following the river outing, the cooler still had ice and felt cold. That well-founded retention is thanks to the brand’s blend of proprietary insulation, interior radiant barrier, and thick base made of three layers of SuperFoam. We also found the water- and stain-resistant exterior very durable. The inside was easier to wipe clean.
The shape and weight feel easy to move around, and the handles are comfortable. We appreciate all of the pockets to help us keep odds and ends organized. There are two zippered pockets, including one that fits a phone, and two huge broad mesh pockets.
According to our ice retention test, this cooler is capable of holding ice for up to 70 hours. This cooler could fit two dozen 12-ounce cans.
Specs:
Size: 15″ x 10″ x 13.5″
Capacity: 33 L
Weight: 816 g (1.8 lbs.)
Ice Retention Test: ~3 days
Pros:
Great ice retention
Economic price
Two over-the-shoulder straps Velcro together plus a removable longer shoulder strap
One of our favorite products was theSnow Peak Soft Cooler ($160). Even given the large size, it was still very comfortable to transport, due to the malleable, soft walls. With the simple, wide handles Velcroed together, we could sling the cooler over our shoulders when it was fully loaded.
A hard cooler this size would require two hands to move. The flexible walls allow us to flatten and fold the cooler for easy storage, saving us space in a tight apartment.
The exterior is made of synthetic plastic and nylon, so it’s not resilient for a rugged whitewater trip but is suitable for basecamp. There’s ample space to carry multiple meals for several people. The insulated walls have an interior aluminum coat that helps trap cold air, and the ice retention is adequate for single- and two-day adventures.
The cooler did well on a weekend road trip to climb Colorado’s Colorado’s Sangre de Cristo Mountains and camp out but wouldn’t be able to retain ice for long durations. Our ice retention test corroborated that experience, showing the cooler is capable of holding ice for nearly 2.5 days.
Specs:
Size: 19″ x 12.5″ x 12.5″
Capacity: 38 L
Weight: 1,724 g (3.8 lbs.)
Ice Retention Test: ~2.5 days
Pros:
Large capacity
Supple and easy to carry
Cons:
The lid’s zipper is not waterproof
A bit overpriced for the low ice retention but worth the cost for collapsibility
The Mountainsmith Takeout ($25) accompanied us on a standup paddleboard session down Colorado’s Slate River, a mellow run sans whitewater. This cute cooler carried and chilled several cans of microbrews and several sparkling waters. We also use it day to day on drives to bring along lunch, snacks, and beverages.
The design is super lightweight and felt comfortable to carry around. It was easy to sling over our shoulders with the removable strap. The material dried surprisingly fast after it wetted while paddling. This design is too small for an all-day adventure, but for a lunchbox or outing, it’s great. And the wide shape allows easy access to the grub inside the cooler.
According to the ice retention test, this cooler can retain ice for 21 hours. To put the size in perspective, this cute cooler could fit six 12-ounce cans.
Specs:
Size: 8″ x 9″ x 6″
Capacity: 7 L
Weight: 363 g (.8 lbs.)
Ice Retention Test: ~21 hours
Pros:
Two tote straps comfortably slide over shoulder
Interior zippered mesh pocket in lid for utensils
Zippers are substantial
Cons:
Exterior pocket is great for a phone but lacks zipper for security
If you have limited storage space, consider the REI Co-op Pack-Away Soft Cooler ($50). This origami-inspired design collapses and folds flat when it’s not a cube or a tote. When transformed into a box or bag shape, the cooler is light, nimble, and malleable. No other cooler would’ve fit into the awkward floor space behind our seats.
We loaded the Pack-Away into our jeep for navigating Colorado’s high-altitude Alpine Loop, a 65-mile route that circumnavigates old mining roads through the San Juan Mountains. The cooler held lunch meats, cheese, veggies, dark chocolate, and seltzer waters. The weather got rowdy with bouts of rain and hail between sunshine.
Overall, we found the cooler durable, given it’s made with a tough polyester shell and abrasion-resistant nylon bottom. It also had decent ice retention. The size and insulation is ideal for a single day out. According to the ice retention test, this cooler can retain ice for 57 hours and fit 24 12-ounce cans.
Specs:
Size: 10″ x 11″ x 15″
Capacity: 32 L
Weight: 680 g (1.5 lbs.)
Ice Retention Test: ~2+ days
Pros:
Daisy chains and spacious external pocket with a zipper
Transforms into a tote, cube, and flat for storage
Cons:
Can’t stack any items on top of this soft cooler
Tote is wobbly and doesn’t dependably stand upright
Zipper takes more effort to open on the cube cooler
We used the Orca Walker Cooler ($220) for tailgating at trailheads after hikes and park BBQs. Ultimately, this is an excellent cooler for single-day adventures. Our team was most impressed by the 840-denier textile exterior, which is tough and doesn’t get banged up.
The insulation is a metal-coated plastic blend, which did a solid job of preserving the ice and goods. We love the soft interior liner and the waterproof zipper that prevents any leaks from the top.
The two side handles aren’t the most comfortable to grab, and we wish they weren’t adjacent to the shoulder straps’ attachment points. The center magnetic handle is smooth and nice to grab. But when the handgrip is detached into two separate pieces, they’re not comfortable to grasp.
According to our ice retention test, this cooler is capable of holding ice for up to 70 hours. This cooler could fit 20 12-ounce cans.
Specs:
Size: 14.5″ x 11″ x 13.25″
Capacity: 33 L
Weight: 1633 g (3.6 lbs.)
Ice Retention Test: ~3 days
Pros:
Cooler won’t leak through waterproof top zipper or seams
Good ice retention
Small stretch exterior pocket
Bungee cords to hold down items
Cons:
Magnetic split handle is not comfortable to grab when divided as two straps
The Hydro Flask Day Escape Soft Cooler Tote ($150) is a super-streamlined, lightweight, and durable design. We used this cooler for park BBQs and love how comfortable it was to slip over our shoulders and carry.
The exterior is made of a 600-denier polyester shell that’s waterproof. The zipper is completely watertight with welded seams, so leaking isn’t on the menu. We noticed the zipper is hard to pull one-handed, and we typically need to counter-pull the side handles to open or close it.
We were surprised to see the cooler’s exterior sweat quite a bit during the ice retention test. The ice melted at a faster rate compared to other coolers, lasting for about 60 hours, but well above the brand’s 36-hour stamp. This cooler could fit 24 12-ounce cans.
Specs:
Size: 12.2″ x 20.5″ x 7.8″
Capacity: 18 L
Weight: 1,134 g (2.5 lbs.)
Ice Retention Test: ~2.5 days
Pros:
Tote straps comfortably slide over shoulder
Waterproof zipper
Cooler is completely leakproof
Cons:
Exterior pocket is great for a phone but lacks zipper for security
The Mountainsmith Sixer($30) was a great cooler for lunch on the go. Our tester, a Colorado-based electrician and mountain biker, packed it with a canned drink, sandwich, fruit, and chocolate. The cooler’s shape and size were easy to fit in a messy work truck.
Inside and out, the cooler is easy to clean. It seems durable, and we like the vintage look. The haul handle is ergonomically sound and comfortable to grab. However, our ice melted fast on hot days, and with minimal room in the cooler, the food can get wet. But, the seamless liner did hold the water and showed no sign of leaks.
According to the ice retention test, this cooler can preserve ice for 25 hours. This cooler could fit one dozen 12-ounce cans.
Specs:
Size: 11″ x 11″ x 6″
Capacity: 12 L
Weight: 499 g (1.1 lbs.)
Ice Retention Test: ~25 hours
Pros:
Two tote straps comfortably slide over shoulder
Great for park concerts
Zippered interior mesh pocket inside cooler lid for utensils
Two flat pockets on cooler’s side but not very spacious
Cons:
We’d like the lightweight removable shoulder strap to be burlier
TheIgloo Pursuit Tote ($80) preserved our bubbly water, hummus, pepperoni, peppers, and arugula while car camping and crewing Hardrock 100. It was easy to carry around from the van to the hotel porch. We most appreciated the lightweight design and malleable fabric.
We could stuff lots of goods inside or squish down the cooler for storage. The slender shape doesn’t bounce around and feels smooth to carry over the shoulder.
We really like the exterior front zipper pocket. But we wish the side mesh water bottle pockets were hardy like the rest of the cooler — they felt flimsy and easily snagged. Also, we loved that the top entry opened wide and had a two-way zipper, but the wide rim made drying out the cooler a challenge.
Ultimately, due to the ice retention, this tote is a solid option for errands and small trips but be sure to pre-cool the bag before use. According to the ice retention test, this cooler can retain ice for 40 hours. It can fit 30 12-ounce cans.
Specs:
Size: 22.4″ x 3.7″ x 15.7″
Capacity: 21 L
Weight: 907 g (2 lbs.)
Ice Retention Test: ~1.5 days
Pros:
Two tote straps comfortably slide over shoulder
Padded removable shoulder strap
Cons:
Ice melts fast in a hot vehicle or sunny conditions
Top zipper is not waterproof and can leak
Fair amount of condensation appeared on cooler’s exterior
Our team loudly applauded the REI Co-op Cool Haul Soft Cooler ($100), which was a dependable tool for whitewater rafting Colorado’s Gunnison River, car camping, and crewing the Hardrock 100. We found the size was good for a duo.
The cooler’s exterior is made with stout ripstop nylon that easily wipes down. Inside, the insulated polyester liner is durable and removable. It’s super easy to pull out and clean.
While adventuring, this cooler did a noteworthy job of preserving ice in sunny conditions and exceeded the capabilities of other coolers we tested. The seams are sealed to prevent leaks. A two-way zipper provides easy top access, and the cube shape nicely slides into tight spaces on a boat or in the truck bed.
According to our ice retention test, this cooler is capable of holding ice for up to 60 hours. To put the size in perspective, this cooler could fit one dozen 12-ounce cans.
Specs:
Size: 14″ x 11″ x 11″
Capacity: 14 L
Weight: 1,415 g (3.12 lbs.)
Ice Retention Test: ~2.5 days
Pros:
Daisy chain webbing and bottle opener included
Interior zippered pocket inside lid keeps food items above ice
Strong, smooth side and top handles
Helpful cooling tips are listed inside the pack’s lid
Cons:
The cube shape bounces off your back when using the shoulder strap
Top zipper is not waterproof, so watch for leaks
Exterior front pocket lacks zipper to secure items
We wanted the team — and especially our anglers — to love the unique Hobie Soft Cooler Fish Bag ($125), but the design let us down in more ways than one.
On the positive side, the cooler is conveniently shaped to fit inside the bow recess of a boat. We took this cooler out boating, fishing, and standup paddleboarding at Taylor Reservoir in the Elk Mountains of Colorado.
The materials are high-quality with closed-cell foam insulation, a vinyl-coated polyester exterior, and snazzy YKK zippers. We liked the two muscular handles. But without a shoulder strap, it wasn’t ideal to transport the cooler more than short distances.
Unfortunately, the seams leaked water all over the rig before we even got to the water’s edge, and then drained within only a couple of hours of use. We saw the same results during our ice retention test — on a wood floor.
Our other grievance is the zipper only goes around halfway, stopping at an awkward spot that limits access and ability to clean the inside of the cooler. Plus, the zipper isn’t waterproof. So, when you grab one of the two handles to carry the cooler, it leaks all over the place.
Ultimately, the ice retention is not as dependable as other coolers, in part because the cold water all drains out. According to our ice retention test, this cooler is able to hold ice for nearly 45 hours.
Specs:
Size: 18″ x 16″ x 8″
Capacity: 19 L
Weight: 2,721 g (6 lbs.)
Ice Retention Test: ~1.5 days
Pros:
Slim design fits well on or in a boat
Bungee cords to hold down items
Cons:
Seams leak
Zipper doesn’t go all the way around so access is awkward
Lacks attachments points for whitewater travel
Needs a removable shoulder strap to conveniently carry to and from water
Bungee cords are at each corner — not D-rings — for tie-down points
We took the aesthetic Fishpond Blizzard Soft Cooler ($100) out fly fishing with two anglers. The compact cooler was full of brews, sparkling water, and lunch food. We really liked the touch of the side rope handles — they’re smooth, tough, and easy to grab and hold.
We also appreciate the two broad pockets on each side. One has a zip closure for security, and the other latches via Velcro.
The lid has a small pop-up Velcro door to provide easy access when the cooler is zipped shut. We wish that small entrance was a tiny bit bigger. It’d also be great to see the door and lid closures upgraded so they don’t leak.
The cooler’s multilayer insulation didn’t keep the ice very well, and the waxed canvas is stylish and soft but soaks up water and gets heavy. According to our ice retention test, this cooler is capable of holding ice for close to 45 hours. It could fit one dozen 12-ounce cans.
Specs:
Size: 11.5″ x 9″ x 10″
Capacity: 17 L
Weight: Unavailable
Ice Retention Test: ~1.5 days
Pros:
YKK zippers
Comfortable padded, removable shoulder strap
Small Velcro lid allows easy access when cooler’s lid is shut
Choose a soft cooler based on the storage capacity and type of support you need for the load. A super malleable product like the Snow Peak Soft Cooler might not be the best for carrying dozens of heavy cans compared to a more rigid design like the YETI Hopper M30 Soft Cooler.
The larger the group, the more cargo space you’ll need. The soft coolers in our guide range from the Mountainsmith Takeout, which can fit six cans, to the 38L Snow Peak Soft Cooler. Most of our choice soft coolers are either larger — 30 to 38 L — for group multiday trips or more compact, ranging from 12 to 19 L.
Compartments & Pockets
Most soft coolers are simple with a central insulated compartment for food and beverages. A handful have an interior zippered compartment inside the lid.
Various exterior pockets are available on some designs, including streamlined fabric and mesh pockets with no closure or bungee straps. Other coolers have external pockets with a Velcro latch, zipper, or waterproof zipper for security.
Weight
The weights of soft coolers are typically reflected by their size and capacity. The smallest design in our guide is the Mountainsmith Takeout, which is less than a pound. The heaviest soft cooler is the 7-pound YETI Hopper M30 Soft Cooler, which has a 30L capacity and the best ice retention.
Even the heaviest soft cooler in our guide is lighter than a hard cooler. For comparison, the YETI Tundra 45 Cooler is 23 pounds, and the RovR Products RollR 45 is more than 37 pounds.
Shape
Soft cooler totes are long, slender, and streamlined against your side. They’re comfortable to carry over a shoulder. However, taller coolers get trickier with access to buried items, so you have to be mindful when packing the cooler.
Soft coolers that are wider or more bucket-style are easier to access, as far as finding a specific item. But, they can feel more cumbersome to carry over a shoulder. Coolers like the OtterBox Trooper 20 Cooler with a broad, flat surface that rests against you can help absorb that swing and bounce.
Boxier coolers can be easier to stack — as long as the walls and base are rigid — while sleeker coolers can more likely slip behind a seat in your car. Shorter, more compact coolers are easier to fit in tight spaces on a boat.
Materials
A soft cooler’s materials include the exterior, insulation, interior liner, and handles. A range of top closures exist. The most common are waterproof and leakproof zippers or non-waterproof and leakproof zippers.
We pay attention to that variable to know if a cooler needs to always be upright. Some unique closures include the powerful magnetic seam of the YETI Hopper M30 Soft Cooler and clasp of the OtterBox Trooper 20 Cooler, which don’t allow leaks. Welded seams also help prevent leaks.
Soft coolers may have shoulder straps — which are typically removable — buckles, attachment points, and interior or exterior pockets. Some pockets have durable, waterproof zipper closures, but many are not weather-resistant or secured with a closure.
The quality of materials influences the waterproofness, durability, insulation value, and whether or not the face fabric produces condensation. The materials also determine the comfort, breathability, support, and overall cost.
Straps & Handles
Handles and straps are constructed with a variety of materials. Some are more ergonomic, comfortable, and durable than others.
Most soft coolers have side or top handles, two straps that swing up to secure together above the cooler, or a removable shoulder strap. A bunch of designs have a combination of handles and straps, too.
We completed our ice retention test with controlled variables. Each soft cooler was stationed indoors around 65 degrees, shaded, and filled with the same ratio and type of ice.
For a variety of conditions, the soft coolers in this guide provide enough cooling power to serve a range of recreation needs.
When you use a cooler outside, many factors influence a pack’s ice retention, including frequency of opening the cooler, direct sunlight, and ambient temperature. For instance, the REI Co-op Cool Haul Soft Cooler preserved ice for 60 hours during our test but only for 18 hours during one toasty car camp trip.
The price of a soft cooler is reflected by the size, durability, quality of materials, design features, and ice retention.
Extra Features
Additional features on soft coolers include hard clip points, daisy chains, webbing straps, and bungee cords for carrying extra gear. Some packs also include a reflective logo or bottle opener.
Many soft coolers do not have tie-down points, which would be a good feature for river or motorcycle trips.
Why You Should Trust Us
Our team has developed cooler guides for several years, objectively testing dozens of soft, hard, and backpack coolers in the field from whitewater raft trips to fly fishing adventures. For this soft coolers guide, we examined the most popular, highly acclaimed, and bestselling products with diverse capacities, ice retention ability, and price spectrum.
Our crew took these coolers through a myriad of conditions from summertime park BBQs to camping in Colorado’s Sangre de Cristo Mountains and road-tripping to ski mountaineer in the Pacific Northwest.
We also performed a controlled in-house ice retention test to verify brand claims. For the experiment, we filled each pre-cooled cooler approximately 70% with fresh, frozen cubed ice and set them in a shaded, dry indoor space at a steady average of 65 degrees.
We periodically checked, making notes regarding melt rate, condensation, and leaks. Each reported time is based on when 100% of the ice converted to water.
This data provides a benchmark. But when traveling outdoors, these controlled variables disappear and the ice will likely melt faster.
(Photo/Eric Phillips)
FAQ
Are Hard or Soft Coolers Better?
There’s utility for both designs. Hard coolers are more durable and stout and have a larger size range, given they can hold more weight without collapsing. Hard coolers can also preserve ice for longer durations. If you’re going on a weeklong car camping trip with limited access to ice, it’s advantageous to have a hard cooler for fresh food.
On the other hand, a soft cooler is a preferred choice for being lightweight, easy to carry — especially for one person — and simple to transport. The compact sizes are great for picnics, day trips, overnight camping, and grocery shopping. Another benefit is some soft coolers are collapsible, so they occupy less space in storage than a hard cooler.
For road trips, you can separate daytime beverages and snacks into a soft cooler, which limits opening of the hard cooler and preserves ice.
Do Soft Coolers Leak?
If the cooler’s seams are not welded and leakproof, they can leak. Soft coolers can also leak through the lid closure if the zipper isn’t waterproof or the clasp isn’t leakproof.
How Effective Are Soft Coolers at Retaining Ice?
Some soft coolers are superior at ice retention, which is generally reflected in the price tag but not always. Some pricier coolers offer adequate ice retention mixed with other qualities like durability and capacity.
In daily adventures, melt speed slightly fluctuates based on the frequency of opening the cooler, how long it’s open, ambient heat, and direct sunlight. A bunch of other variables influence ice retention too, including the type and quantity of ice, extra space in the compartment (which decreases effectiveness), and if the cooler was pre-chilled.
Can You Put Dry Ice in a Soft Cooler?
For most soft coolers, dry ice will burn the interior materials. Instead, you should use freshly frozen cubed ice, ice blocks, or reusable ice packs.
How Can I Make My Soft Cooler Stay Colder, Longer?
For the longest-lasting ice retention and cooling capability, aim to use a 2:1 ratio of ice to contents. You can quickly pre-chill your cooler with a sacrificial bag of ice a few hours before loading it up, especially if the cooler was stored in a hot place. Or, bring the cooler inside a cool room to lower the temperature the night before use.
The type of ice makes a difference. Block ice and fresh cubed ice from freezers are denser than chipped ice or crushed ice from ice machines. If you get super strategic, you can use a mix of block ice — which melts slowly — and cubed ice — which cools down the container quickly.
As the ice melts, it’s ideal to retain the ice water, which helps the other ice stay cold. Limit your access to the cooler because opening it up releases the cold air. Keep your cooler in the shade to prolong that low temperature. If you’re under direct sun, toss a towel or blanket over the cooler to help alleviate a heat spike.
The Best Camping Stoves of 2021
We tested the best camping stoves from Coleman, Camp Chef, Kovea, Snow Peak, and more for this review. Check it out to see how each performs and which stove came out on top. Read more…
The Best Camping Tents of 2021
Make the most of your home away from home by choosing the best camping tent for your adventure. We found the top car camping and family camping tents for every budget and use. Read more…
As companies sent their people packing and working from home, they included company gear for them to work on. However, many people have their own personal computers at home.
To support the simultaneous use of multiple systems, developers created software such as Synergy. By using these applications, you can use one mouse and keyboard across multiple computers without having to plug and switch devices.
So aside from Synergy, what other options are there? Here are the five best apps for sharing a mouse and keyboard across different systems.
1. Share Mouse
If you have two computers at home, you can use Share Mouse to control both systems with whatever connected keyboard and mouse you have. No matter if you’re on a Mac or a PC, the peripherals on both systems can crossover to the other device.
For example, if you have a Windows device and a MacBook Pro, you can use the trackpad on the keyboard and trackpad on your MacBook to control your Windows device. It also works vice-versa, with the Windows PC peripherals working on your Mac.
You can use the Share Mouse app as long as both computers are on the same network. It’s free for personal use—but is limited to a maximum of two computers/two displays only. If you want to use the software on up to nine devices, each with up to four monitors, you have to purchase the Pro version.
When you get the Pro version, you also get additional features like locking and unlocking all connected devices simultaneously, synced screen savers, and even remote log-in. Best of all, every Share Mouse licenses have a portable version so that you can use it on other computers without extra installation.
Download: Share Mouse for Windows and Mac (Free, other licenses available)
2. Input Director
This free, powerful, and feature-rich software keyboard, video, and mouse switch (KVM) offers a range of keyboard, video, and mouse switching options. However, it is only compatible with Windows 10, Windows 8/8.1, and Windows 7. This app won’t work with Apple or Linux systems.
What separates this from Share Mouse is that all its features are available for the free version. It offers multi-monitor support, key-bindings, macros, and even enhanced security options.
You can limit which computers can control your Input Director app by name, IP address, or even subnet. And if you’re planning to employ this in a network to which several other users connect, you can encrypt your data to keep them safe.
Again, this powerful app is free for personal use. But if you want to employ this in a commercial and corporate setting, you have to contact the maker.
Mouse Without Borders is a side-project created by Microsoft engineers under the company’s Garage program. Likewise, while this is not an official Microsoft product, it is developed and supported by its employees and is recognized as such. However, because of this, it’s also available for Windows devices only.
It’s even available for download on Microsoft’s Garage, the platform designed to push software innovations from their employees and customers. Furthermore, support for its use is available via Microsoft’s Community Forums.
Like the other KVMs above, you can share one keyboard and mouse across four computers connected to the same network. You can also set custom shortcuts to make it easier for you to navigate across devices.
The single greatest advantage this app has over the other options is its relationship with Microsoft. Since their engineers and programmers created this app, you can expect fewer issues with the operating system. The developers are already familiar with the app’s working environment to issue updates ensuring compatibility faster than other third-party software companies.
Download: Mouse Without Borders for Windows (Free)
4. Multiplicity
This app is one of the more powerful software KVM options. Although it’s only free to try, the paid licenses will let you do so much more than just controlling multiple computers through one keyboard and mouse set.
The KVM and KVM Pro licenses allow you to stream multiple computers on a single monitor. And all licenses can connect to any computer, whether connected to your local network or via a VPN. So even if you’re physically distant from a device, you can use it like it’s right in front of you.
Audio sharing is also enabled across all licenses, so if you play an audio file on one slave device, the sound will output on your main computer. And with Multiplicity, your control inputs are not limited to keyboard and mouse. It also accepts hot-key and touch switching for touchscreen computers, allowing you to use it even with Microsoft tablets and 2-in-1s.
Download: Multiplicity for Windows (Free for 30 Days, Purchase Required)
5. Barrier
When using multiple systems together, like Mac, Windows, and PC, you’re bound to run into some compatibility issues. So if you want to use KVM software, it could be challenging to find an app that will work well on all three different operating systems.
That’s where Barrier comes in—it’s a free, open-source KVM software based on the popular Synergy app, which was itself based on the original CosmoSynergy program by Chris Schoeneman. But unlike Synergy, Barrier is a no-frills app designed to work simply.
It only has two features: it lets you control multiple computers with one keyboard and mouse, and it shares clipboards across your devices. But since this is an open-source project, you can tweak the program to your needs if you’re into programming.
So if you want to connect your PC to your Mac for free or connect any system to your Linux computer, Barrier is the only solution for you.
Control Multiple Systems With One Keyboard and Mouse
Software KVMs are helpful for automatically connecting multiple devices. You no longer have to press a switch or turn a dial just to control your other device. Having this will save you both time and desk space, letting you get more done.
So whether you’re a programmer, a video editor, or even a writer, if you’re working with multiple systems a lot, a KVM app will make you more efficient.
Xinova, a Seattle company that operated a network of inventors, is winding down operations, GeekWire has learned.
Xinova spun out of Intellectual Ventures in 2016 and helped match inventor ideas with customers such as PepsiCo, Honda, Funai, and others. It billed itself as an “innovation-as-a-service” platform.
The company raised a $48 million Series A investment to scale the business and grow its network that included more than 12,000 inventors across 118 countries. Xinova would find companies that needed tech solutions; put a call out to its inventor network; and compensate inventors via upfront payment and profit-sharing agreements. Xinova would typically cover development costs and manage intellectual property. The company at one point employed more than 100 people globally across ten offices worldwide.
But Xinova needed more cash and ran into trouble when it tried raising another $100 million. The U.S.-China trade war and the pandemic caused investor wariness, and one firm even backed out of a signed funding commitment.
The company had to trim expenses, laying off staff over the past two years and cutting costs elsewhere. It again tried to raise more capital earlier this year but wasn’t able to convince investors. Xinova tried to work with its creditors on a restructuring plan but that also didn’t pan out, forcing the shutdown decision. The company now has only two employees who are helping wind down operations.
Edward Jung, who helped launch invention business Intellectual Ventures in 2000 and was an early Microsoft engineering leader, was Xinova’s founder and CEO. He said the company was able to run an “economically-sustainable business” but couldn’t renegotiate its legacy liabilities, which made additional equity fundraising impossible.
Jung resigned several months ago, citing a conflict with his position as the largest secured creditor. He said he is responsible for “taking on liabilities and risks in excess to what was sustainable through these unexpected changes.”
“I regret disappointing my most excellent investors, partners, and employees,” Jung added. “But I remain a believer in the vision of global innovation networks and am continuing this vision in new stealth projects.”
Jung launched Intellectual Ventures with former Microsoft technology chief Nathan Myhrvold. In 2007, Jung began heading up the firm’s “Invention Development Fund,” which was spun out in 2016 as Xinova.
Jorma Ollila, former chairman of Royal Dutch Shell and former chairman and CEO of Nokia, was Xinova’s executive chairman. Paul Levins, Xinova co-founder and former chief strategy officer, left in 2019 and is currently helping restaurant tech startup Souszen and agtech startup Beanstalk.
Xinova in 2019 launched a joint venture called Arcnet, an online capital marketplace that lets investors fund innovation projects on one platform across borders.
Xinova Asia will continue to operate. Xinova also had offices in Japan, Finland, Tel Aviv, Vienna, Beijing, Singapore, Sydney, Hong Kong, and Bangalore.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1pO1a3IzWsA/maxresdefault.jpgIn this video, I will show you how to get set up using Planet Scale and Laravel using the MySQL Connection String.
PlanetScale is the only serverless database platform you can start in seconds and scale indefinitely.
https://planetscale.comLaravel News Links
As a student of programming, you’ve likely learned plenty of different algorithms throughout the course of your career. Becoming proficient in different algorithms is absolutely essential for any programmer.
With so many algorithms, it can be challenging to keep track of what’s essential. If you’re prepping for an interview or simply brushing up on your skills, this list will make it relatively easy. Read on as we list the most essential algorithms for programmers.
1. Dijkstra’s Algorithm
Edsger Dijkstra was one of the most influential computer scientists of his time, and he contributed to many different areas of computing science, including operating systems, compiler construction, and much more. One of Dijkstra’s most notable contributions is the ingenuity of his shortest path algorithm for graphs, also known as Dijkstra’s Shortest Path Algorithm.
Dijkstra’s algorithm finds the single shortest path in a graph from a source to all graph vertices. On every iteration of the algorithm, a vertex is added with the minimum distance from the source and one that does not exist in the current shortest path. This is the greedy property used by Djikstra’s algorithm.
The algorithm is typically implemented using a set. Dijkstra’s algorithm is very efficient when implemented with a Min Heap; you can find the shortest path in just O(V+ElogV) time (V is the number of vertices and E is the number of edges in a given graph).
Dijkstra’s algorithm has its limitations; it only works on directed and undirected graphs with edges of positive weight. For negative weights, the Bellman-Ford algorithm is typically preferable.
Interview questions commonly include Djikstra’s algorithm, so we highly recommend understanding its intricate details and applications.
2. Merge Sort
We’ve got a couple of sorting algorithms on this list, and merge sort is one of the most important algorithms. It’s an efficient sorting algorithm based on the Divide and Conquer programming technique. In a worst-case scenario, merge sort can sort “n” numbers in just O(nlogn) time. Compared to primitive sorting techniques such as Bubble Sort (that takes O(n^2) time), merge sort is excellently efficient.
In merge sort, the array to be sorted is repeatedly broken down into subarrays until each subarray consists of a single number. The recursive algorithm then repeatedly merges the subarrays and sorts the array.
3. Quicksort
Quicksort is another sorting algorithm based on the Divide and Conquer programming technique. In this algorithm, an element is first chosen as the pivot, and the entire array is then partitioned around this pivot.
As you’ve probably guessed, a good pivot is crucial for an efficient sort. The pivot can either be a random element, the media element, the first element, or even the last element.
Implementations of quicksort often differ in the way they choose a pivot. In the average case, quicksort will sort a large array with a good pivot in just O(nlogn) time.
The general pseudocode of quicksort repeatedly partitions the array on the pivot and positions it in the correct position of the subarray. It also places the elements smaller than the pivot to its left and elements greater than the pivot to its right.
4. Depth First Search
Depth First Search (DFS) is one of the first graph algorithms taught to students. DFS is an efficient algorithm used to traverse or search a graph. It can also be modified to be used in tree traversal.
The DFS traversal can start from any arbitrary node, and it dives into each adjacent vertex. The algorithm backtracks when there is no unvisited vertex, or there’s a dead-end. DFS is typically implemented with a stack and a boolean array to keep track of the visited nodes. DFS is simple to implement and exceptionally efficient; it works(V+E), where V is the number of vertices and E is the number of edges.
Typical applications of the DFS traversal include topological sort, detecting cycles in a graph, pathfinding, and finding strongly connected components.
5. Breadth-First Search
Breadth-First Search (BFS) is also known as a level order traversal for trees. BFS works in O(V+E) similar to a DFS algorithm. However, BFS uses a queue instead of the stack. DFS dives into the graph, whereas BFS traverses the graph breadthwise.
The BFS algorithm utilizes a queue to keep track of the vertices. Unvisited adjacent vertices are visited, marked, and queued. If the vertex doesn’t have any adjacent vertice, then a vertice is removed from the queue and explored.
BFS is commonly used in peer-to-peer networks, shortest path of an unweighted graph, and to find the minimum spanning tree.
6. Binary Search
Binary Search is a simple algorithm to find the required element in a sorted array. It works by repeatedly dividing the array in half. If the required element is smaller than the middlemost element, then the left side of the middle element is processed further; otherwise, the right side is halved and searched again. The process is repeated until the required element is found.
The worst-case time complexity of binary search is O(logn) which makes it very efficient at searching linear arrays.
7. Minimum Spanning Tree Algorithms
A minimum spanning tree (MST) of a graph has the minimum cost among all possible spanning trees. The cost of a spanning tree depends on the weight of its edges. It’s important to note that there can be more than one minimum spanning tree. There are two main MST algorithms, namely Kruskal’s and Prim’s.
Kruskal’s algorithm creates the MST by adding the edge with minimum cost to a growing set. The algorithm first sorts edges by their weight and then adds edges to the MST starting from the minimum.
It’s important to note that the algorithm doesn’t add edges that form a cycle. Kruskal’s algorithm is preferred for sparse graphs.
Prim’s Algorithm also uses a greedy property and is ideal for dense graphs. The central idea in Prim’s MST is to have two distinct sets of vertices; one set contains the growing MST, whereas the other contains unused vertices. On each iteration, the minimum weight edge that will connect the two sets is selected.
Minimum spanning tree algorithms are essential for cluster analysis, taxonomy, and broadcast networks.
An Efficient Programmer Is Proficient With Algorithms
Programmers constantly learn and develop their skills, and there are some core essentials that everyone needs to be proficient in. A skilled programmer knows the different algorithms, the benefits and drawbacks of each, and which algorithm would be most appropriate for a given scenario.
After Mysterio reveals Spider-Man’s true identity, Peter Parker’s life is in chaos. So he asks his friend Doctor Strange to make everyone forget his secret identity. But Peter’s indecisiveness causes Doc’s spell to go wrong, opening a rift in space-time. No Way Home looks like a thrilling gateway to the Multiverse of Madness.
Spatie has introduced an exceptional package called Laravel Media library. This package can incorporate all kinds of files with Eloquent models. It offers a straightforward and fluent API for working. The storage of the uploaded files is managed by Laravel’s Filesystem. So You can easily store large files on another filesystem. The Pro version of the package offers Blade, Vue, and React components to manage uploads to the media library and to handle the content of a media library collection.
Requirements
Laravel Media Library requires PHP 7.4+ and Laravel 7+.
This package uses JSON columns.
MySQL 5.7 or higher is required.
Installation & Setup
You can install the Media library via Composer. If you want to utilize the base package, then run this command:
By default, the media library will store its files on Laravel’s public disk. If you want a specific disk, you should add a disk to config/filesystems.php. You’ve to add this configuration:
Don’t forget to .gitignore the directory of your configured disk, So the files won’t end up in your git repo.
To store all media on that disk by default, you need to set the disk_name config value in the media-library config file to the name of the disk that you’ve added.
The storage of the files is managed by Laravel’s Filesystem, so you can plug in any compatible filesystem. This package can also generate derived images such as thumbnails for images, videos, and pdfs. Once you’ve set up your model, they’re easily accessible: