Open and Concealed Carry are Protected by the Second Amendment

Constitutional We the People
We the People have the right to keep and bear arms. It says it right here on this Constitution.

Arizona -(Ammoland.com)- The natural right to bear arms includes the right to carry them concealed as well as openly. Both types of carry were practiced at the time of the ratification of the Bill of Rights. Flintlock “muff pistols” were widely available before 1791. Daggers, dirks and other assorted blades were commonly carried concealed. Sword canes conceal the blade inside of the cane, and are considered concealed weapons. They were commonly available.  They became popular, in part, to avoid any social reproach against the carry of swords, anticipating the condemnation of open carry today.

Historic examples of choices for concealed carry.
Historic examples of choices for concealed carry.

The Second Amendment does not differentiate between concealed and openly carried arms.  Such differentiation was not discussed during the debates about the Second Amendment.  It was decades after the Bill of Rights was ratified that concealed carry was questioned. Arms technology had not changed significantly.

Concealed weapons had and have military purposes. General Gage, the British Officer in charge of occupied Boston, had his officers conceal their sidearms when patrolling to prevent Paul Revere’s ride. From William Diamond’s Drum page 94:

And finally, unbeknown to him. Gage had that afternoon posted mounted officers, with their sidearms concealed as though they were on pleasure jaunts, along the Cambridge roads, just in case messengers should try to give out alarms that night.

There were no colonial statutes that separated the carrying of concealed weapons from the open carrying of weapons.

The Kentucky legislature passed a statute forbidding concealed arms in 1813. It was challenged in court.

The statute was found unconstitutional in Bliss v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, in the state Supreme Court. It was 1822, three decades after the Second Amendment was ratified.  Any restriction on bearing arms was contrary to “the right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the state“, and was therefore void.

The court reasoned that any diminution of the right that existed when the Constitutional protection was adopted, was an infringement of the right, and was therefore unconstitutional. The logic is impeccable.

In 1833, the Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights, including the Second Amendment, did not apply to the states.

In 1833, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled that concealed carry could be banned for people who were not travelers.

Five other state courts, with different state constitutions,  (Alabama, Tennessee, Arkansas, Georgia, and Louisiana), ruled their legislatures could ban concealed carry  from 1833 to 1850, to varying degrees.

In Kentucky, a Constitutional amendment was deemed necessary. The constitutional amendment to allow the legislature to regulate the concealed carry of weapons passed in 1849, as part of a constitutional convention. In 1850, the wording in bold was added:

  “That the rights of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned; but the General Assembly may pass laws to prevent persons from carrying concealed arms.”

All but Indiana were slave states.  Prohibiting the carry of concealed weapons is particularly important to keeping suspect minorities disarmed.  If the weapons are concealed, it is much harder to enforce legal or extralegal disarmament techniques, such as selective enforcement under color of law.

In 1859,  The Texas Supreme Court, in Cockrum v. state, held that “The right of a citizen to bear arms, in defense of himself or the State, is absolute.”  The court cited both the Second Amendment and the then current Texas Constitution. The case held that if inexpensive weapons were prohibited, the right of self defense would be chilled for poor people.

In 1868 the Fourteenth Amendment was passed to assure, in part, that the Second Amendment would be enforced to insure that freed slaves could keep and bear arms. The former slave states found ways to evade the requirement. In 1873, the Fourteenth Amendment’s enforcement of the Bill of Rights against state encroachment was nullified by the Supreme Court.

In 1903, the Vermont Supreme Court, in State v. Rosenthal, found that an ordinance requiring a permit to carry a concealed pistol “..repugnant to the Constitution and laws of the state,”.

Federal laws have never been passed against the carry of concealed weapons.

In 2008 the Heller decision made clear what it meant to bear arms. Scalia quoted Justice Ginsburg’s writing in a previous case.  From cornell.edu:

Justice Ginsburg wrote that “[s]urely a most familiar meaning is, as the Constitution’s Second Amendment … indicate[s]: ‘wear, bear, or carry … upon the person or in the clothing or in a pocket, for the purpose … of being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person.’ ”

“..in the clothing or in a pocket” is carrying concealed.

Justice Scalia concluded that laws banning the concealed carry of arms were constitutional, solely because such laws were long standing in a number of states. Such laws were not upheld before the 1830’s, 40 years after the Bill of Rights was ratified.

Laws against the concealed carry of weapons are vestiges of laws designed to keep slaves and free blacks disarmed.

In 2010, the Supreme Court held the Second Amendment is incorporated against the States by the Fourteenth Amendment, finally doing what the Court should have done in 1873.

Adam Winkler, an Constitutional scholar at UCLA, has written that allowing only open carry may be the best way to discourage bearing arms in general.  He made the case this might be the most effective way for the California legislature to chill the exercise of the Second Amendment.

Vermont has never required a permit for open or concealed carry. Twelve states have reformed their laws to allow the carrying of weapons, concealed or openly, without permission from the government, since 2003. They call it Constitutional Carry.

Both open carry and concealed carry are protected by the Second Amendment. Restricting the bearing of arms to either open carry or  concealed carry is a clear infringement of that right to bear arms.

©2018 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.

Link to Gun Watch


About Dean Weingarten:Dean Weingarten

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

This post Open and Concealed Carry are Protected by the Second Amendment appeared first on AmmoLand.com .

via AmmoLand.com
Open and Concealed Carry are Protected by the Second Amendment

How to Concealed Carry a Full-Size (Or Even Larger) Gun

Sometimes you don’t want to just carry a pocket pistol.

Instead, you want to be able to feel the weight of that 1911 as you walk around, and hear it clunk on your nightstand when you take it off for the evening.

You just want to carry something big.

gun recoiling into shooters face
Well, Something Big – Within Reason.

Now when most people think “big gun,” they think 1911 or a long barrel revolver, but unless you’re the Joker, you probably aren’t going to carry a Smith & Wesson 500 Magnum with the 6.5-inch barrel or a full-size Desert Eagle.

Instead, you might want to carry a Glock 17, H&K VP9, Kimber Stainless II 1911, or something similar.

While some of these have shorter barrels than others, they are all full-size guns, and none of them are small.

CCW Full Size 1911
Concealed Carry 1911. Because You Can.

Of course, carrying a bigger gun brings a different set of challenges that you face when you carry a subcompact or even a compact handgun.

To help you out, this article is going to go over some of the things you’ll want to consider when you are thinking about or having trouble carrying a big gun.

Now, as you read below, it may come across like carrying a big gun is not a good idea.  That’s not the case at all; it’s totally up to you what you carry.

I do, however, want to discuss the pitfalls of carrying a big gun so you are aware of them before you go out and spend 1200 dollars on a sweet 1911 and realize you can’t appendix carry it like you saw in a movie.

So let’s get started.

Size Matters

Let’s compare some guns so you can see the size difference.

Springfield 1911 A1
Springfield 1911 A1

Compared to something like the Sig P238 in .380, a standard 1911 is 3.4 inches longer and almost twice as thick.  Even compared to a Glock 36 (their .45 ACP subcompact) you aren’t gaining much other than more gun to carry around.

Is one round worth hauling around the extra 15.5 ounces?  That’s almost an extra pound… for one bullet.

So what do we gain with the bigger gun?

For starters, you get a slightly larger round if you go with a 9mm version of the Kimber.  But, if you are carrying a 1911, most wouldn’t bother with 9mm and instead, go with the .45 ACP. This gives you a much larger round, obviously.

9mm Will Kill Your Body, .45 ACP Will Kill Your Soul

So yeah, you get one more bullet with the .45 ACP version, but the gun is almost twice as wide.  It’s even wider than the Glock 36 which is 1.10 inches wide and holds 6+1 rounds also.

Carry Positions for a Large CCW

Now that you know what you’re getting into, let’s talk carry positions for your big CCW gun.  Your carry position will greatly depend on your body type.

For example, if you are 5’11” and weigh 180 pounds, you’re more limited than a guy who’s 6’5” and 280 pounds.

Of course, your clothing choices will also play a large part how and where you carry a big CCW gun.

Do you wear tee shirts all the time?

Do you wear a jacket and dress pants?

Carrying pistol concealed
How You Dress Affects How You Carry

A smaller frame pistol will be easier to conceal in the summer and in thinner, tighter fitting clothing.

Furthermore, your full-sized gun isn’t something you’ll want to carry in an ankle holster or even appendix carry.  It’s not going to be comfortable and is unlikely to even fit in the first place.

All that said, let’s look examine what options you do have.

Wear a Jacket

Depending on the occasion, you could wear a jacket.  This would allow for an OWB holster anywhere from the 3-6 o’clock position.  Most jackets will easily hide even a full-size gun in a holster.

Plus, even if you are able to comfortably carry your sidearm of choice in an IWB holster, adding another layer of loose-fitting clothing will help you ensure that you won’t print.

If you do choose to use an OWB holster, be sure not to keep it in a spot where it can easily be accidentally exposed.

Carrying a Glock
Carrying a Glock Under a Jacket

Making sure your gun isn’t an attention grabber will also help.  If you have a nickel plated something or other with a mural painted on the slide, it’s going to be a lot easier to spot if your jacket opens in the wind.

Black gun, black holster, black pants; even a darker shirt helps.  And, of course, just keeping your jacket zipped or buttoned makes a huge difference.  If black isn’t your thing…check out our Gray Man Loadout.

Shoulder Holster

A shoulder holster is an alternative to a waistband holster if you are wearing a jacket.

This kind of holster isn’t for everyone though.  Those of us who have a thinner build might need to position the holster more to the vertically to hide the gun.

Regardless, the barrel could poke at the rear of your jacket or the grip might print out the front.

Shoulder Holster
Shoulder Holster and 1911

When holstering your gun under your arm, make sure you practice your draw. If you aren’t accustomed to it, you may fumble or have an otherwise difficult time if you need to pull your gun under pressure. This also goes for t-shirt holsters.

Inside the Waistband Holster

An IWB holster is also an option.  Like a shoulder holster, using a holster inside your waistband will really depend on your body-type.

You will also need to make sure you wear the appropriate clothing to conceal your gun.  A tuckable holster can help when you aren’t wearing a jacket or some other outer layer like a sweatshirt.

The position of your carry will also greatly depend on your body shape.  If you are on the leaner side, you will probably need to carry at the 4 or 5 o’clock position.

If you have a little more mass to you, the 3 o’clock position might be easier for you to hide and still draw your gun easily if you need it.

We can help you find the right IWB holster for you in our Best Concealed Carry Holsters review.

Final Thoughts

When you choose the gun you are going to carry every day to protect yourself, you need to make sure you can handle it well, so be sure to consider why you want to choose a large CCW weapon.

I prefer to carry for safety, but don’t like to have the inconvenience of a large gun where I need to change the way I bend or move or wear different clothing.

On the other hand, some people prefer the feeling of security that goes with a weightier weapon or feels more confident carrying a larger caliber.

Looking for more options? You should take a look at our other Best CCW Guns articles, we’ve looked at a huge range of guns from full-size to revolvers to subcompacts.

What about you?  What’s your CCW sidearm of choice?  What are your thoughts on big guns for CCW?  Have any advice for those looking for concealed carry larger sidearms?  As always, share your thoughts in the comments!

The post How to Concealed Carry a Full-Size (Or Even Larger) Gun appeared first on Pew Pew Tactical.

via Pew Pew Tactical
How to Concealed Carry a Full-Size (Or Even Larger) Gun

New Webinar on How to Design Open Source Databases for High Availability

Join us March 27th for this webinar on how to design open source databases for high availability with Ashraf Sharif, Senior Support Engineer at Severalnines. From discussing high availability concepts through to failover or switch over mechanisms, Ashraf will cover all the need-to-know information when it comes to building highly available database infrastructures.

It’s been said that not designing for failure leads to failure; but what is the best way to design a database system from the ground up to withstand failure?

Designing open source databases for high availability can be a challenge as failures happen in many different ways, which sometimes go beyond imagination. This is one of the consequences of the complexity of today’s open source database environments.

At Severalnines we’re big fans of high availability databases and have seen our fair share of failure scenarios across the thousands of database deployment attempts that we come across every year.

In this webinar, we’ll look at the different types of failures you might encounter and what mechanisms can be used to address them. We will also look at some of popular high availability solutions used today, and how they can help you achieve different levels of availability.

Sign up for the webinar

Date, Time & Registration

Europe/MEA/APAC

Tuesday, March 27th at 09:00 BST / 10:00 CEST (Germany, France, Sweden)

Register Now

North America/LatAm

Tuesday, March 27th at 09:00 PDT (US) / 12:00 EDT (US)

Register Now

Agenda

  • Why design for High Availability?
  • High availability concepts
    • CAP theorem
    • PACELC theorem
  • Trade offs
    • Deployment and operational cost
    • System complexity
    • Performance issues
    • Lock management
  • Architecting databases for failures
    • Capacity planning
    • Redundancy
    • Load balancing
    • Failover and switchover
    • Quorum and split brain
    • Fencing
    • Multi datacenter and multi-cloud setups
    • Recovery policy
  • High availability solutions
    • Database architecture determines Availability
    • Active-Standby failover solution with shared storage or DRBD
    • Master-slave replication
    • Master-master cluster
  • Failover and switchover mechanisms
    • Reverse proxy
    • Caching
    • Virtual IP address
    • Application connector

Sign up for the webinar

Speaker

Ashraf Sharif is System Support Engineer at Severalnines. He was previously involved in hosting world and LAMP stack, where he worked as principal consultant and head of support team and delivered clustering solutions for large websites in the South East Asia region. His professional interests are on system scalability and high availability.

via Planet MySQL
New Webinar on How to Design Open Source Databases for High Availability

Now you can visit Disney Parks in the US through Google Street View

Special for kids — and importantly parents of kids — now you can get designs on visiting Disney — and dropping a small fortune in the process — thanks to Google Maps after it added Street View images for 11 Disney Parks.

The feature looks to cover parks in the U.S. only at this point, but that alone might help you relive a recent visit, or else familiarize yourself for the first/next one.

It’s been interesting to watch Google Maps develop into a tool for tourism. Particularly in Asia, governments and tourism boards have worked with Google to help bring popular destination and cultural landmarks onto the service. That’s in contrast to the West, where Maps had been seen as a service that poses significant privacy concerns — remember back in 2010 when Google sucked up personal data via its Street View cars?

Disney might not be a world wonder or cultural hotspot, but it definitely makes sense for the parks to have a more visual presence on Google Maps, and so here we are.

Don’t worry, trusted sources close to TechCrunch’s Matthew Panzarino have assured me that he will continue to make his annual visit to Disneyland to test Apple’s newest iPhone in real-world conditions despite this new tie-up with Google. Some things just can’t be digitized.

via TechCrunch
Now you can visit Disney Parks in the US through Google Street View

Google adds Disney parks to Street View

Last year Google revamped its Street View cameras to help us better map the real world, now it’s taken the technology to a much more magical land. From today, you’ll be able to explore inside 11 Disney Parks, getting an on-the-ground glimpse of all its castles, rides and attractions, including the captivating Avatar-themed world of Pandora. It’ll also definitely prove popular when the Star Wars area opens up next year. Now if only the imagery was available in real time, so we’d know whether to bother lining up for Splash Mountain or not.

via Engadget
Google adds Disney parks to Street View

Researchers: Schools are safer than they were in the 90s, and school shootings are not more common than they used to be

by Allie Nicodemo and Lia Petronio

The deadly school shooting this month in Parkland, Florida, has ignited national outrage and calls for action on gun reform. But while certain policies may help decrease gun violence in general, it’s unlikely that any of them will prevent mass school shootings, according to James Alan Fox, the Lipman Family Professor of Criminology, Law, and Public Policy at Northeastern.

Since 1996, there have been 16 multiple victim shootings in schools, or incidents involving 4 or more victims and at least 2 deaths by firearms, excluding the assailant.

Of these, 8 are mass shootings, or incidents involving 4 or more deaths, excluding the assailant.

“This is not an epidemic”

Mass school shootings are incredibly rare events. In research publishing later this year, Fox and doctoral student Emma Fridel found that on average, mass murders occur between 20 and 30 times per year, and about one of those incidents on average takes place at a school.

Their research also finds that shooting incidents involving students have been declining since the 1990s.

Four times the number of children were killed in schools in the early 1990s than today, Fox said.

Click here to read the entire article at news.northeastern.edu.


via Buckeye Firearms Association
Researchers: Schools are safer than they were in the 90s, and school shootings are not more common than they used to be

Why Gun-Control Fails Miserably

Recently, National Review‘s David French penned an op-ed in hopes of explaining to some people why so many of us own guns. Yesterday, Bethany Mandel did the same thing in the pages of the New York Times. The idea was simple and noble. They wanted to show folks who don’t own guns why so many others do.

French notes that the response to both articles illustrates why gun control fails so miserably every single time.

Yet the responses to both essays have helped demonstrate why the Left keeps losing on guns. It simply can’t persuade a rational, reasonable adult who’s experienced a threat that they’re safer without effective means of self-defense. Indeed, the effort to make this case is so often rooted in condescension or ignorance that it’s deeply alienating.

First, there’s an odd argument that it’s somehow illegitimate to make a decision based on “fear.” Or — as one correspondent put it — “fear and paranoia.” This makes no sense. Americans make safety-based decisions all the time. Is it wrong to buckle a seatbelt because that’s a “fear-based” decision? Should you ride a motorcycle without a helmet just to show the world you’re not scared? Reasonable people take precautions in the face of real threats.

Next, you immediately hear that you’re foolish. That “you’re more likely to hurt yourself than defend yourself.” In other words, the gun is more dangerous to you and your family than it is to any given criminal. But if you’re speaking to a responsible, non-suicidal adult, then this argument is flat-out wrong. In fact, even when you include suicides in the analysis — and compare them to the best estimates of annual defensive gun use — you’ll find that law-abiding Americans use guns to defend themselves far more than they do to hurt themselves.

Moreover, another person’s irresponsibility is irrelevant to the existence of my fundamental liberties. I don’t surrender my free-speech rights because another person uses theirs to troll Twitter. I don’t surrender my right to free exercise of religion because another person joins a cult. I don’t surrender my inherent and unalienable right to self-defense because a man across town decides to kill himself.

It’s part of a much larger post, and I highly recommend you read it, but he’s right.

Many other people and I find the arguments against having the means to defend yourself delusional. I’ve heard them all before, but they’ve never made any sense. How am I more likely to hurt myself than defend myself? I’m not an idiot, after all, so if I follow a few basic safety rules, I shouldn’t have a problem, right?

Yet in the mind of the gun control activist, it seems we’re all perpetually stupid. No one can comprehend the basics of gun safety, which is probably why the words “gun safety” coming out of their mouths should be translated as “ban them all.” They think that’s the only way to keep any of us safe from guns.

The problem for them is that we don’t need them. Most Americans, even those who don’t own guns, know that we don’t need them. They can look at these arguments and see them for what they are, complete and utter nonsense.

That’s why gun control doesn’t work. It doesn’t work because it’s always premised on people being too stupid to live without some elite telling us how to do it.

No one wants to put up with that, so even a lot of non-gun owners refuse to accept that line of reasoning.

Yeah, they make a few wins here and there, but they’re small potatoes, and they can’t do it on the national stage. To make matters worse, they know it, and it burns them up.

It just makes me giggle.

via Bearing Arms
Why Gun-Control Fails Miserably

Netflix will let parents block individual movies and shows

Netflix announced today that it will soon be rolling out a new tool for parents. Already, parents can manage what their kids watch by putting all content above a particular maturity level behind a PIN or by marking which accounts belong to a child. But soon, parents will also be able to require a PIN for certain shows or movies. This way, parents won’t have to block full levels of content if they don’t want to and can instead just keep their children from watching certain titles. Additionally, maturity level ratings will also be displayed more noticeably on the screen when a new title begins playing.

Netflix’s changes come as a number of companies are working to make their platforms more child-appropriate. Apple plans to introduce more parental controls to its devices in the near future and YouTube recently had to deal with some disturbing content that was parading as kid-friendly. Gadgets geared towards children have also come under scrutiny as privacy concerns mount and Facebook’s new Messenger Kids app has attracted criticism for encouraging kids to spend more time on digital devices.

Netflix says its new controls will be rolling out in the coming months and that it’s also looking into how to make maturity level ratings more descriptive and easier to understand.

Via: VentureBeat

Source: Netflix

via Engadget
Netflix will let parents block individual movies and shows

Activate Netflix’s New Parental Controls

Parents worried their kids will consume some unseemly content on Netflix have been able to block all the content that falls under a particular rating. Now, Netflix’s latest update gives you a little more control, allowing you to prevent your young viewer from watching particular programs you deem unsuitable for them, even if it falls in your selected ratings range. Not everyone wants their kid watching Stranger Things, no matter how many games of D&D they play. To keep them away from questionable content, all you need is a PIN and a list of movies you don’t want your child to see.

Add a PIN, Add Some Banned Movies

Go to Netflix to visit your account page and select the Parental Controls link. Enter your password and choose a PIN, which you’ll need to unlock the restrictions should you want to watch a previously restricted title. From there you can drag the rating slider from “Little Kids” to “Adults” and restrict by maturity level. If you just want to restrict a few particular movies and don’t want to put an entire category of films off-limits, you can add the name of the show or movie you want to block under the Restrict Specific Titles section.

Advertisement

Netflix also made it easier to figure out a movie’s rating before that first channel-changing scene. Now, when you start a show, you’ll see the film rating prominently displayed in the corner. Reconsidering your viewing ban on a few programs? Just enter the PIN when you select the banned title.


via Lifehacker
Activate Netflix’s New Parental Controls

Paul Allen team locates another long lost warship as USS Lexington is found 76 years after sinking

USS Lexington
A 5-inch gun on the USS Lexington as it is seen at the bottom of the Coral Sea, off the coast of Australia. (Vulcan Photo)

A team led by Paul Allen has done it again at the bottom of the sea, locating the wreckage of another long lost U.S. Navy warcraft.

A crew working with Allen’s Research Vessel (R/V) Petrel found the USS Lexington on Sunday, 76 years after it sank in the Coral Sea, more than 500 miles off the eastern coast of Australia. The aircraft carrier — one of the first ever built in the U.S. — was located about two miles below the surface.

According to a post on the Microsoft co-founder’s website, the ship, which went down with 35 aircraft on board, took part in the Battle of the Coral Sea from May 4-8, 1942. The Lexington was hit by multiple Japanese torpedoes and bombs, in a battle alongside the USS Yorktown and three Japanese carriers. A secondary explosion and fire ultimately led to calls to abandon ship, and 2,770 crewmen and officers were rescued, while 216 were lost.

The USS Phelps delivered torpedoes that sank the crippled ship, the first aircraft carrier casualty in history.

“To pay tribute to the USS Lexington and the brave men that served on her is an honor,” Allen said in a statement. “As Americans, all of us owe a debt of gratitude to everyone who served and who continue to serve our country for their courage, persistence and sacrifice.”

USS Lexington
The USS Lexington off Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii, with Diamond Head in the background, on Feb. 2, 1933. (U.S. Navy Photo)
USS Lexington
Damage is shown to the port forward 5-inch gun gallery on USS Lexington during the Battle of the Coral Sea, May 8, 1942. The view looks aft, with the ship’s number two 5/25 gun in the foreground, still manned and in operation. The number four 5/25 gun is immediately beyond, trained out to port and aft. (U.S. Navy Photo)

Robert Kraft, director of subsea operations for Allen, said that the ship was on a priority list of those lost during World War II.

“Based on geography, time of year and other factors, I work together with Paul Allen to determine what missions to pursue,” Kraft said. “We’ve been planning to locate the Lexington for about six months and it came together nicely.”

Underwater images and video taken by a subsea vehicle launched by Petrel show the large guns on the carrier as well as some of the airplanes resting on the ocean floor. The Petrel’s state-of-the-art subsea equipment allows it to dive to 6,000 meters, and since being deployed last year it was active in several missions in the Philippine Sea before moving to the Coral Sea.

Last year, Allen-led expeditions led to the discovery of the USS Indianapolis and USS Ward, as well as the Italian WWII destroyer Artigliere. In 2015, the USS Astoria and Japanese battleship Musashi were located.

Check out more images of the Lexington site, released by Allen’s team on Monday:

USS Lexington
The USS Lexington nameplate. (Vulcan Photo)
USS Lexington
An aircraft on the bottom of the Coral Sea. (Vulcan Photo)
USS Lexington
A blast shield is shown, with writing, on the USS Lexington. (Vulcan Photo)
USS Lexington
The control room onboard Paul Allen’s R/V Petrel. (Vulcan Photo)

via GeekWire
Paul Allen team locates another long lost warship as USS Lexington is found 76 years after sinking