Category: Uncategorized

The last few years have seen the introduction of a number of interesting .22 caliber revolvers. Among them are the Ruger Wrangler and the Heritage Barkeep. These affordable wheel guns are well suited to general carry and recreational use.

The latest entrant in the affordable .22 revolver race is slightly more expensive, but this one is a double action revolver with an interchangeable swing out cylinder.

The Diamondback Sidekick was announced in August. It appears to be a clone of the High Standard Double Nine. It will probably also remind many of the old H&R 929 Sidekick.

When I was growing up it seemed almost everyone including my grandfather owned a Double Nine. When you wanted protection, but didn’t want a center fire with its greater expense and recoil, the High Standard Double Nine was a popular choice.

Designed to look like a traditional single action or cowboy gun with its plow handle grip and large trigger spur, the Double Nine was a double action revolver with a swing out cylinder. It was immensely popular and missed by old time shooters.

Today we have an alternative that may be a better gun. Modern manufacturing has given us an improved .22 revolver with much to recommend it.

The Diamondback Sidekick may be a clone, but it stands strong on its own merits. The revolver features a swing out cylinder with nine chambers. The cylinder release doubles as the ejector rod. Pull the ejector rod forward to release the cylinder. Load, close the cylinder, and you are ready to fire.

The double action revolver may be fired double action with a simple pull of the trigger or in single action by cocking the hammer and applying a light trigger press.

The Sidekick is smooth enough in double action for an economy revolver. The best means of managing the double action pull is to stage he trigger; press until the hammer almost falls, pause to get a solid sight picture, and then fire.

The single action trigger pull breaks at a very clean, crisp four pounds. That invites single action shooting and most shots fired with a Sidekick will probably be while plinking or informal target practice. The double action trigger is pleasant enough to make for good double action training.

The traditional plow handled grip with GFN checkered scales fits most hands well. There is no step in the handle required to stabilize the hand for double action fire with the .22’s modest recoil. The hammer spur allows for easy thumb cocking.

The barrel is 4.5 inches long, but expect other options to be offered down the road. The sights are the usual post front blade and grooved rear sight as you’d expect on a six nine shooter like this. The sights are well regulated for the six o’clock hold at ten yards. The finish is Cerakote.

A great option the Sidekick gives you is the use of interchangeable cylinders, one in .22 long rifle and one in .22 Magnum. Both will ship with the revolver. This isn’t something that’s been offered often with double action revolvers as fitting the crane is more difficult than simply using a base pin in a single action revolver.

The bolt holding the cylinder crane is spring-loaded. I used an old pen shaft to depress the latch and pull the cylinder away. Depress the shaft again and snap the other cylinder in place. The system is simple. After changing the cylinders headspace remains tight.

A simple groove in the top strap and a post front sight may not makes for gilt edged accuracy, but the sights are properly regulated for 40 grain loads. I used a mix of various makers 40 grain RNL loads to test the wheel gun. Five Remington Thunderbolts produced a 2.0-inch group at 15 yards. The Sidekick is more than accurate enough for informal target practice, plinking, and small game hunting.

The .22 Magnum cylinder offers a crackerjack option for larger pests. I wont get into the .22 Magnum for personal defense debate, but if you want a rimfire for easy critter control at a relatively low expense, the Sidekick is as good as any.

A natural comparison most will make here is the Ruger Wrangler, but the comparison isn’t really fair. The Wrangler and the Sidekick are about equally accurate. The Ruger, however, doesn’t have a .22 Magnum option. It’s also a single action gun with a six shot cylinder that loads via a loading gate.

The question then becomes, are those difference worth the extra outlay for the Diamondback revolver. I would gladly pay the difference for the Sidekick. They won’t hit retailers until next week, but I think Diamondback has a winner in this revolver.

Caliber: .22 LR/.22 Mag convertible
Action: Single/Double
Grips: Checkered, glass-filled polymer
Capacity: 9 rounds
Front Sight: Blade
Rear Sight: Integral
Overall Barrel Length: 4.5 inches
Overall Length: 9.875 inches
Frame & Handle Finish: Black Cerakote
Overall Weight: 32.5 ounces
MSRP: $320 (expect about $290 retail)

Ratings (out of five stars):

Ergonomics * * * * *
The heft and balance are excellent. This classic revolver handles well and the grip is comfortable. There’s a reason the Colt SAA has been so popular for the last century and a half.

Accuracy * * * * *
For the price and compared to the Ruger Wrangler and Heritage Rough Rider the Sidekick is quite accurate. Soda cans and milk jugs should be afraid. Very afraid.

Reliability * * * * *
The Sidekick never failed to crack off 240 .22 Long Rifle cartridges and 27 .22 Magnum. The only problem you may have in terms of reliability with this gun will be due to the rimfire ammo that goes into it.

Value * * * * ½
There are less expensive similar guns that are also fine for plinking and taking small game. But they don’t have all the features of the Sidekick. You pays your money and takes your choice.

Overall * * * * *
I love the Sidekick. It’s a fun gun that will take game and guard the homestead quite well and it’s very high on the fun-to-shoot scale.

 

In my opinion, at least. 🙂

As a Laravel developer, I’ve spent a lot of time learning from some of the best Laravel developers. Do names such as Adam Wathan, Colin DeCarlo, Jason McCreary ring a bell? They should. If they don’t, here is a quick fix. My list of 12 fantastic talks that you could learn a ton from.

Testing

Test-Driven Laravel

by Adam Wathan

An excellent intro into TDD. TDD seems easy until you need to talk or test DB queries, generate PDF, deal with APIs and so on. He will lear you how to do all those stuff. Even better and more it depth is his course. A must-watch for every developer who doesn’t know where to start practising TDD.

Lies You’ve Been Told About Testing

by Adam Wathan

Jet another great talk from Adam about testing. Stop worrying about architecture. Start emphasising the details.

Code refactoring, patterns

Patterns That Pay Off

by Matt Stauffer

Matt talks about different patterns that we don’t think about when building an application. Then, he dives into picking better code patterns by reviewing code bases.

Writing code that lasts

by Raphael Dohms

Writing code that survives the test of time and self-judgment is a matter of clarity and simplicity. This is a talk about growing, learning and improving our code with calisthenics, readability and good design.

Everything I Ever Needed To Know About Web Dev, I Learned From My Twitter Timeline

by Colin DeCarlo

Somehow lengthy title, however still worth watching. Colin DeCarlo talks about some ideas on cleaning up code in your application gained from “fire tweets” on twitter.

Cruddy by Design

by Adam Wathan

There is never enough controllers. From @dhh tweet: More controllers doing less work obviates the need for any other fancy patterns. In this talk, Adam shows how you can move code from one controller into multiple ones.

Design Patterns with Laravel

by Colin DeCarlo

Colin talks entertainingly about three patterns: adapter, strategy and factory one.

Resisting Complexity

by Adam Wathan

Why is it OK that a User can be saved? Because according to Adam, methods are affordances.
Furthermore, don’t be afraid of facades, he says. But, to be fair, I think this statement was more relevant in 2018 than today. I think facades are well accepted nowadays.

LaraconUs 2018

by Colin DeCarlo

Having the correct tools is not the same as using the tools correctly. Learn how to use Laravel tools correctly. Some more tips on how your code could be better and more readable.

Practicing YAGNI

by Jason McCreary

This talk is about how to avoid overengineering and why you ain’t gonna need it is good.
Jason also has a BaseCode course. It is about code refactoring. Do check it out.
A field guide containing real-world practices to help you write code that’s less complex and more readable.

Laracon US

by Sandi Metz

She is one of the gurus in the Rails world. Different language, same rules. Do you know what a code smell is?
Really, name 5? Spoiler, nobody can.

MySql

Eloquent Performance Patterns

by Jonathan Reinink

If MySql and not your thing, you can learn a lot here. Even better, Jonathan shows how to write more complex and optimised queries with Laravel Eloquent. Finally, if you like the talk, here is an entire course dedicated to it.

Happy watching & learning.

Disclaimer: nobody paid me to promote those courses here. I bought and watched all of them. And I learned a lot. I generally think those courses are worth paying for.